IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v199y2025ics0148296325003935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reputational risk taking and category non-conformity in new product launches: Insights from the Scotch whisky industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lampel, Joseph
  • Ronen, Daniel
  • Banerjee, Aneesh

Abstract

This paper proposes a stock and flow model of reputational risk-taking to show that producers with higher reputation are more likely to take the risk of launching non-conforming products into their product line compared to producers with lower reputation. We also argue that product line differentiation relative to that of competitors will moderate potential reputational losses. We test these dynamics using unique panel data of the launch of single malt Scotch whiskies – With-Age-Statement (WAS) and No-Age-Statement (NAS) in the entire Scotch whisky industry from 2007 to 2015, a period that saw a rapid rise in the launch of NAS whiskies. Our study contributes to research that examines links between firm reputation and the launching of non-conforming products at the market category level. Our study also contributes to recent research that argues that category research should shift from emphasis on category stability, to the dynamics of category change.“Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don’t mind, it doesn’t matter.”Mark Twain

Suggested Citation

  • Lampel, Joseph & Ronen, Daniel & Banerjee, Aneesh, 2025. "Reputational risk taking and category non-conformity in new product launches: Insights from the Scotch whisky industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003935
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003935
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.