IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v101y2019icp651-659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The adoption of project management methodologies and tools by NGDOs: A mixed methods perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Verga Matos, Pedro
  • Romão, Mário
  • Miranda Sarmento, Joaquim
  • Abaladas, Alexandre

Abstract

Several studies in the area of project management have concluded that development projects implemented by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have specific features associated with the diversity of stakeholders, the scarcity of resources, and the importance of intangible objectives. Consequently, classical methodologies may not be suitable. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the project management tools used by nongovernmental development organizations (NGDOs) and their effect on project performance. This was done by studying the perceptions of project managers from Portuguese NGDOs. A mixed methods design was adopted. In an initial phase, a questionnaire was sent to Portuguese NGDOs. The resulting data was analyzed by fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). In a second phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subgroup of selected project managers from these organizations. The results reveal a specific profile regarding the importance of project management tools and methodologies for NGDO performance. These results reflect the specific features of these types of projects and organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Verga Matos, Pedro & Romão, Mário & Miranda Sarmento, Joaquim & Abaladas, Alexandre, 2019. "The adoption of project management methodologies and tools by NGDOs: A mixed methods perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 651-659.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:101:y:2019:i:c:p:651-659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319300852
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gasper, D.R., 1999. "Evaluating the "logical framework approach" : towards learning-oriented development evaluation," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19048, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    2. Thomas Ziesemer, 2016. "The Impact of Development Aid on Education and Health: Survey and New Evidence for Low‐income Countries from Dynamic Models," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(8), pages 1358-1380, November.
    3. Patrick Martens & Mieke van Riet & Rui Miguel Santos, 2013. "The Management of International Development Projects: Enhancing Sustainable Outcomes with Improved Project Management Education and Training," Working Papers 2013/20, Maastricht School of Management.
    4. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, September.
    5. Flyvbjerg,Bent & Bruzelius,Nils & Rothengatter,Werner, 2003. "Megaprojects and Risk," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521009461.
    6. Vera Z. Eichenauer & Bernhard Reinsberg, 2017. "What determines earmarked funding to international development organizations? Evidence from the new multi-bi aid data," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 171-197, June.
    7. Mas-Verdú, Francisco & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo & Roig-Tierno, Norat, 2015. "Firm survival: The role of incubators and business characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 793-796.
    8. Leila Hurmerinta-Peltomäki & Niina Nummela, 2006. "Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 439-459, August.
    9. Eric Werker & Faisal Z. Ahmed, 2008. "What Do Nongovernmental Organizations Do?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 73-92, Spring.
    10. Constantine Michalopoulos, 2017. "Aid, Trade and Development," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-65861-2, November.
    11. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Biggs, Stephen & Smith, Sally, 2003. "A Paradox of Learning in Project Cycle Management and the Role of Organizational Culture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1743-1757, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Battisti, Enrico & Alfiero, Simona & Leonidou, Erasmia, 2022. "Remote working and digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Economic–financial impacts and psychological drivers for employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 38-50.
    2. Federica Nieri & Luciano Ciravegna, 2019. "Investigating firms' involvement in corporate social irresponsibility: Are family owned MNEs better corporate citizens?," Discussion Papers 2019/254, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    3. Gabriela Dufková, 2022. "Time and Budget Overruns on Czech International Development Projects," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 70(7-8), pages 622-645, July.
    4. Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Javier Romero & Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez, 2020. "Finding the Links between Risk Management and Project Success: Evidence from International Development Projects in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Milis Nilgun Caibula & Constantin Militaru, 2021. "Stakeholders Influence on the Closing Phase of Projects," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup1), pages 136-148, April.
    6. Matt Andrews, 2022. "Getting Real about Unknowns in Complex Policy Work," CID Working Papers 406, Center for International Development at Harvard University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonçalves, Helena Martins & Lourenço, Tiago Ferreira & Silva, Graça Miranda, 2016. "Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1484-1491.
    2. Albort-Morant, Gema & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2016. "How useful are incubators for new entrepreneurs?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2125-2129.
    3. Nicola Del Sarto & Alberto Di Minin & Giulio Ferrigno & Andrea Piccaluga, 2021. "Born global and well educated: start-up survival through fuzzy set analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1405-1423, April.
    4. Curado, Carla & Henriques, Paulo Lopes & Oliveira, Mírian & Matos, Pedro Verga, 2016. "A fuzzy-set analysis of hard and soft sciences publication performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5348-5353.
    5. Vizcaíno, Marcos & Chousa, Juan P., 2016. "Analyzing the influence of the funds' support on Tobin's q using SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2118-2124.
    6. Jerónimo, Helena Mateus & Henriques, Paulo Lopes & Lacerda, Teresa Correia de & da Silva, Filipa Pires & Vieira, Pedro Rino, 2020. "Going green and sustainable: The influence of green HR practices on the organizational rationale for sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 413-421.
    7. Ir. Michiel Kort & Stefan Verweij & Erik-Hans Klijn, 2016. "In search for effective public-private partnerships: An assessment of the impact of organizational form and managerial strategies in urban regeneration partnerships using fsQCA," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(5), pages 777-794, August.
    8. Sascha Kraus & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano & Miriam Schüssler, 2018. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 15-33, March.
    9. Gieure, Clara & Buendía-Martínez, Inmaculada, 2016. "Determinants of translation-firm survival: A fuzzy set analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5377-5382.
    10. Jennings, Will & Lodge, Martin & Ryan, Matt, 2018. "Comparing blunders in government," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83523, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Felício, José Augusto & Duarte, Margarida & Rodrigues, Ricardo, 2016. "Global mindset and SME internationalization: A fuzzy-set QCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1372-1378.
    12. Fernanda Bethlem Tigre & Paulo Lopes Henriques & Carla Curado, 2022. "Building trustworthiness: Leadership self-portraits," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 3971-3991, December.
    13. Paulo Lopes Henriques & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira & Antônio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, 2019. "Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1301-1324, May.
    14. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan Ramón & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2016. "Examining the influence of stock market variables on microblogging sentiment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2087-2092.
    15. Curado, Carla & Muñoz-Pascual, Lucía & Galende, Jesús, 2018. "Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 206-215.
    16. Bullini Orlandi, Ludovico & Zardini, Alessandro & Rossignoli, Cecilia, 2021. "Highway to hell: Cultural propensity and digital infrastructure gap as recipe to entrepreneurial death," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 188-195.
    17. Henriques, Paulo Lopes & Matos, Pedro Verga & Jerónimo, Helena Mateus & Mosquera, Pilar & da Silva, Filipa Pires & Bacalhau, João, 2018. "University or polytechnic? A fuzzy-set approach of prospective students' choice and its implications for higher education institutions' managers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 435-441.
    18. Drăgan, George Bogdan & Ben Arfi, Wissal & Tiberius, Victor & Ammari, Aymen, 2023. "Gravitating exogenous shocks to the next normal through entrepreneurial coopetive interactions: A PLS-SEM and fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Nadia Di Paola, 2021. "Pathways to academic entrepreneurship: the determinants of female scholars’ entrepreneurial intentions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1417-1441, October.
    20. Estevão, João & Raposo, Clara, 2018. "The impact of the 2030 Climate and Energy Framework Agreement on electricity prices in MIBEL: A mixed-methods approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 411-417.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:101:y:2019:i:c:p:651-659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.