IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v91y2022ics016028962100101x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thirty years of research on general and specific abilities: Still not much more than g

Author

Listed:
  • Ree, Malcolm James
  • Carretta, Thomas R.

Abstract

Results of a 30-year research program indicate that specific cognitive abilities (s) provide little or no incremental validity beyond general cognitive ability (g). Definitions of g and s are provided and examples from training and job performance are presented. All samples are large adding to confidence in the results. On average, the increased validity for multiple regressions between using g versus g plus s was 0.02. The weight of the evidence suggests that the increment of 0.02 is an artifact of measurement error. An alternative ability model that fails to separate g and s is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Ree, Malcolm James & Carretta, Thomas R., 2022. "Thirty years of research on general and specific abilities: Still not much more than g," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:91:y:2022:i:c:s016028962100101x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2021.101617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028962100101X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ree, Malcolm James & Carretta, Thomas R. & Teachout, Mark S., 2015. "Pervasiveness of Dominant General Factors in Organizational Measurement," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 409-427, September.
    2. Joseph Levin, 1972. "The occurrence of an increase in correlation by restriction of range," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 93-97, March.
    3. S. Wilks, 1938. "Weighting systems for linear functions of correlated variables when there is no dependent variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 3(1), pages 23-40, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serban, Andra & Kepes, Sven & Wang, Wenhao & Baldwin, Robert, 2023. "Cognitive ability and creativity: Typology contributions and a meta-analytic review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Lin, Chien-An & Bates, Timothy C., 2022. "Smart people know how the economy works: Cognitive ability, economic knowledge and financial literacy," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Egeland, Jonathan, 2022. "The ups and downs of intelligence: The co-occurrence model and its associated research program," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frederic Lord, 1958. "Some relations between guttman's principal components of scale analysis and other psychometric theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(4), pages 291-296, December.
    2. Harold Gulliksen, 1943. "A course in the theory of mental tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 8(4), pages 223-245, December.
    3. Graefe, Andreas & Armstrong, J. Scott, 2008. "Forecasting Elections from Voters’ Perceptions of Candidates’ Positions on Issues and Policies," MPRA Paper 9829, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Daniel Segall, 2001. "General ability measurement: An application of multidimensional item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 79-97, March.
    5. Andreas Graefe & Kesten C Green & J Scott Armstrong, 2019. "Accuracy gains from conservative forecasting: Tests using variations of 19 econometric models to predict 154 elections in 10 countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Clintin Davis-Stober, 2011. "A Geometric Analysis of When Fixed Weighting Schemes Will Outperform Ordinary Least Squares," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 650-669, October.
    7. Davis, Alexander L. & Krishnamurti, Tamar, 2013. "The problems and solutions of predicting participation in energy efficiency programs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 277-287.
    8. Bert Green, 1969. "Best linear composites with a specified structure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(3), pages 301-318, September.
    9. Wang, Li-Na & Wang, Kai & Shen, Jiang-Long, 2020. "Weighted complex networks in urban public transportation: Modeling and testing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    10. Cucina, Jeffrey M. & Wilson, Kimberly J. & Walmsley, Philip T. & Votraw, Lisa M. & Hayes, Theodore L., 2023. "Is there a g in gunslinger? Cognitive predictors of firearms proficiency," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Bryan, Victoria M. & Mayer, John D., 2020. "A meta-analysis of the correlations among broad intelligences: Understanding their relations," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Robert Wherry, 1940. "An approximation method for obtaining a maximized multiple criterion," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 5(2), pages 109-115, June.
    13. Niels Waller & Jeff Jones, 2009. "Locating the Extrema of Fungible Regression Weights," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 589-602, December.
    14. Peter Z. Schochet, 2009. "An Approach for Addressing the Multiple Testing Problem in Social Policy Impact Evaluations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(6), pages 539-567, December.
    15. Karel JANDA & Jakub MIKOLÁŠEK & Martin NETUKA, 2010. "Complete almost ideal demand system approach to the Czech alcohol demand," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(9), pages 421-434.
    16. Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos, 2011. "Psychological Heuristics for Making Inferences: Definition, Performance, and the Emerging Theory and Practice," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 10-29, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:91:y:2022:i:c:s016028962100101x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.