IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v156y2025ics0168851025000740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ethics of behaviour-based insurance models: Solidarity-based concerns in Germany's statutory health insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Bredthauer, Carl Justus
  • Kuhn, Eva
  • Buyx, Alena

Abstract

Sickness funds have begun to harness digital behavioural data to incentivise physical activity in their members. This ethical and societal effects of this phenomenon remain largely unclear, especially in solidarity-based insurance systems. Therefore, this study analysed the risks and benefits of such programmes with respect to solidarity against the background of recent efforts by German statutory health insurance funds to integrate digital tracking data into their bonus programmes. Key, potential benefits include new forms of solidarity that may emerge based on sharing personal health data. The incentives introduced by these reward programmes could lead to efficiency gains used to benefit society. However, three conceptual pitfalls have been identified: First, the data gathering method may penalise certain vulnerable groups. Such discrimination could, however, be avoided by minimising barriers to participation. Second, digitally mediated bonus programmes may create deadweight effects, i.e. beneficiaries are likely to already be healthy and active. Consequently, behavioural targets should be designed to consider individual prerequisites. Lastly, linking premiums to behaviour might diminish solidarity with poor risks within statutory health insurances and between statutory and private health insurance. Hence, this study aimed to stimulate debate on the ethical and societal implications of the systemic integration of eHealth innovations into healthcare systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Bredthauer, Carl Justus & Kuhn, Eva & Buyx, Alena, 2025. "The ethics of behaviour-based insurance models: Solidarity-based concerns in Germany's statutory health insurance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:156:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025000740
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000740
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:156:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025000740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.