IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v136y2022ics1389934121002938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective models for the forest harvest scheduling problem in a continuous-time framework

Author

Listed:
  • González-González, José Mario
  • Vázquez-Méndez, Miguel Ernesto
  • Diéguez-Aranda, Ulises

Abstract

In this study we present several multi-objective models for forest harvest scheduling in forest with single-species, even-aged stands using a continuous formulation. We seek to maximize economic profitability and even-flow of timber harvest volume, both for the first rotation and for the regulated forest. For that, we design new metrics that allow working with continuous decision variables, namely, the harvest time of each stand. Unlike traditional combinatorial formulations, this avoids dividing the planning horizon into periods and simulating alternative management prescriptions before the optimization process. We propose to combine a scalarization technique (weighting method) with a gradient-type algorithm (L-BFGS-B) to obtain the Pareto frontier of the problem, which graphically shows the relationships (trade-offs) between objectives, and helps the decision makers to choose a suitable weighting for each objective. We compare this approach with the widely used in forestry multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II. We analyze the model in a Eucalyptus globulus Labill. forest of Galicia (NW Spain). The continuous formulation proves robust in forests with different structures and provides better results than the traditional combinatorial approach. For problem solving, our proposal shows a clear advantage over the evolutionary algorithm in terms of computational time (efficiency), being of the order of 65 times faster for both continuous and discrete formulations.

Suggested Citation

  • González-González, José Mario & Vázquez-Méndez, Miguel Ernesto & Diéguez-Aranda, Ulises, 2022. "Multi-objective models for the forest harvest scheduling problem in a continuous-time framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:136:y:2022:i:c:s1389934121002938
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934121002938
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brumelle, Shelby & Granot, Daniel & Halme, Merja & Vertinsky, Ilan, 1998. "A tabu search algorithm for finding good forest harvest schedules satisfying green-up constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 408-424, April.
    2. Heaps, Terry, 2015. "Convergence of optimal harvesting policies to a normal forest," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 74-85.
    3. Pascual, Adrián, 2021. "Building Pareto Frontiers under tree-level forest planning using airborne laser scanning, growth models and spatial optimization," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Heaps, Terry, 1984. "The forestry maximum principle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 131-151, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Terry Heaps, 2016. "Multiple Use Values and Convergence of Optimal Harvesting Policies," Discussion Papers dp16-09, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    2. Moriguchi, Kai & Ueki, Tatsuhito & Saito, Masashi, 2020. "Establishing optimal forest harvesting regulation with continuous approximation," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    3. Newman, D.H., 2002. "Forestry's golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 5-27.
    4. Tahvonen, Olli & Salo, Seppo & Kuuluvainen, Jari, 2001. "Optimal forest rotation and land values under a borrowing constraint," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1595-1627, October.
    5. Isabel Martins & Mujing Ye & Miguel Constantino & Maria Conceição Fonseca & Jorge Cadima, 2014. "Modeling target volume flows in forest harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 343-362, April.
    6. John Livernois & Henry Thille & Xianqiang Zhang, 2006. "A test of the Hotelling rule using old‐growth timber data," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 163-186, February.
    7. Gardner Brown, 2000. "Renewable Natural Resource Management and Use Without Markets," Working Papers 0025, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    8. Viana, Ana & Pinho de Sousa, Jorge, 2000. "Using metaheuristics in multiobjective resource constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 359-374, January.
    9. Fabbri, Giorgio & Faggian, Silvia & Freni, Giuseppe, 2015. "On the Mitra–Wan forest management problem in continuous time," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1001-1040.
    10. Callaway, J.M., 2000. "Assessing the Costs and Market Impacts of Carbon Sequestration, Climate Change and Acid Rain," Other publications TiSEM c58adec9-1535-46cf-b213-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Terry Heaps, 2014. "Convergence of Optimal Harvesting Policies to a Normal Forest," Discussion Papers dp14-01, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    12. González-González, José M. & Vázquez-Méndez, Miguel E. & Diéguez-Aranda, Ulises, 2020. "A note on the regularity of a new metric for measuring even-flow in forest planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1101-1106.
    13. Sahashi, Yoshinao, 2002. "The convergence of optimal forestry control," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 179-214, May.
    14. Ken-Ichi Akao, 2011. "Optimum forest program when the carbon sequestration service of a forest has value," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 13(4), pages 323-343, December.
    15. Salo, Seppo & Tahvonen, Olli, 2002. "On Equilibrium Cycles and Normal Forests in Optimal Harvesting of Tree Vintages," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Khazri, Olfa & Lasserre, Pierre, 2011. "Forest management: Are double or mixed rotations preferable to clear cutting?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 155-171, January.
    17. Zhang, Daowei, 2001. "Faustmann in an uncertain policy environment," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 203-210, June.
    18. Huizhen Zhang & Miguel Constantino & André Falcão, 2011. "Modeling forest core area with integer programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 41-55, October.
    19. Jette Bredahl Jacobsen & Frank Jensen & Bo Jellesmark Thorsen, 2018. "Forest Value and Optimal Rotations in Continuous Cover Forestry," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(4), pages 713-732, April.
    20. Bettinger, Pete & Boston, Kevin & Kim, Young-Hwan & Zhu, Jianping, 2007. "Landscape-level optimization using tabu search and stand density-related forest management prescriptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1265-1282, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:136:y:2022:i:c:s1389934121002938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.