IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v89y2026ics1544612325025954.html

Can motivated funds mitigate ESG disagreement? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Xiaobei
  • Song, Yunling
  • Wu, Hao
  • Lin, Lirong

Abstract

This study investigates how motivated funds—defined as institutional investors holding firms in their top 10 % portfolio positions by market capitalization—mitigate ESG rating disagreement in China’s capital markets. Analyzing 16,116 A-share firm-year observations (2017–2021), we find that their ownership significantly reduces environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating discrepancies, particularly among firms with superior information transparency or heightened external scrutiny. These funds concurrently enhance ESG disclosure quality, increasing the likelihood of voluntary reporting by 23.7 % while reducing textual similarity across sustainability reports. Critically, although ESG divergence exacerbates stock price volatility and synchronicity, the presence of motivated funds attenuates these distortions. Our results identify concentrated institutional investors as governance intermediaries that alleviate ESG information asymmetry, even in markets dominated by controlling shareholders, thereby providing regulators with actionable insights for advancing sustainable finance in emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Xiaobei & Song, Yunling & Wu, Hao & Lin, Lirong, 2026. "Can motivated funds mitigate ESG disagreement? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:89:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325025954
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.109346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325025954
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Ye & Pan, Yuetong & Shan, Tao & Zhou, Yanyu, 2025. "ESG rating disagreement and the cost of equity financing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Tarelli, Andrea, 2026. "Active fund management when ESG matters," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Lili Ding & Zhongchao Zhao & Lei Wang, 2020. "Executive Incentives Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility under Earnings Pressure and Institutional Investors Supervision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Cornaggia, Jess & Mao, Yifei & Tian, Xuan & Wolfe, Brian, 2015. "Does banking competition affect innovation?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 189-209.
    5. Li, Zhibing & Liu, Jia & Liu, Jie & Liu, Xiaoyu & Wu, Chonglin, 2025. "Investor attention and stock price manipulation: Evidence from daily quasi-natural experiments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. He, Feng & Ding, Cong & Yue, Wei & Liu, Guanchun, 2023. "ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Gao, Kaijuan & Shen, Hanxiao & Gao, Xi & Chan, Kam C., 2019. "The power of sharing: Evidence from institutional investor cross-ownership and corporate innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 284-296.
    8. Mark R. DesJardine & Jody Grewal & Kala Viswanathan, 2023. "A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: The Effects of Common Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 1716-1735, September.
    9. Atawnah, Nader & Zaman, Rashid & Liu, Jia & Atawna, Thaer & Maghyereh, Aktham, 2023. "Does foreign competition affect corporate debt maturity structure? Evidence from import penetration," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Fu, Chuanrui & Zou, Jingjing & Li, Li & Wang, Yanhui, 2025. "Institutional investors' site visits and ESG disclosure: The mediating role of environmental legitimacy pressure," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    12. Wang, Yibo, 2025. "Institutional investors’ field research and corporate green innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Raffaele Morandi Stagni & Juan Santaló, 2025. "Investors' attention and the paradox of technologically related diversification: Evidence of stock market mispricing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(10), pages 2432-2466, October.
    14. Fich, Eliezer M. & Harford, Jarrad & Tran, Anh L., 2015. "Motivated monitors: The importance of institutional investors׳ portfolio weights," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 21-48.
    15. Cronqvist, Henrik & Ladika, Tomislav & Pazaj, Elisa & Sautner, Zacharias, 2024. "Limited attention to detail in financial markets: Evidence from reduced-form and structural estimation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Chen, Zhenyun & Wu, Cuidan, 2025. "The role of revised securities law on ESG rating divergence: Through the perspective of disclosure quality and internal control," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. Appel, Ian R. & Gormley, Todd A. & Keim, Donald B., 2016. "Passive investors, not passive owners," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 111-141.
    18. Hu, Kexin & Li, Xingyi & Li, Zhongfei, 2024. "Effect of ESG rating disagreement on stock price informativeness: Empirical evidence from China's capital market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    19. Li, Yunqian & Xiao, Jun, 2025. "The effect of institutional investors’ site visits on corporate greenwashing behavior," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2003. "Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 337-386, December.
    21. Chen, Yi-Chun & Hung, Mingyi & Wang, Yongxiang, 2018. "The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 169-190.
    22. Yin, Chao & Ward, Charles & Tsolacos, Sotiris, 2018. "Motivated monitoring: The importance of the institutional investment horizon," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 197-212.
    23. Liu, Xiangqiang & Dai, Jiajie & Dong, Xiaohong & Liu, Jia, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and analyst forecast quality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    24. Michael D. Kimbrough & Xu (Frank) Wang & Sijing Wei & Jiarui (Iris) Zhang, 2024. "Does Voluntary ESG Reporting Resolve Disagreement among ESG Rating Agencies?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 15-47, January.
    25. Zhang, Zhaoting & Zhang, Lei, 2024. "Investor attention and corporate ESG performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    26. Qian, Kun & Shi, Bingjie & Song, Yunling & Wu, Hao, 2023. "ESG performance and loan contracting in an emerging market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    27. Ward, Charles & Yin, Chao & Zeng, Yeqin, 2018. "Institutional investor monitoring motivation and the marginal value of cash," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 49-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Xin & Ali, Hesham & Aboelkheir, Heba, 2025. "Unleashing creative potential: The role of stable institutional ownership in exploratory innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    2. Zhang, Ping & Ma, Binbin & Chi, Chuenyu, 2025. "Institutional investors and ESG performance: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1159-1181.
    3. Chang, Zhenghao & Zhou, Hang & Ruan, Mengyu & Li, Qin, 2025. "When major customers matter: customer concentration and ESG rating disagreement," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    4. Liu, Xutang & Boubaker, Sabri & Liao, Jing & Yao, Shouyu, 2025. "The rise of common state ownership and corporate environmental performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    5. Li, Qianqian & Watts, Edward M. & Zhu, Christina, 2024. "Retail investors and ESG news," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2).
    6. Jingyu Yang & Hai Wu & Yangxin Yu, 2021. "Distracted institutional investors and audit risk," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 3855-3881, September.
    7. He, Jia & Shen, Xixi, 2024. "Institutional investor cross-ownership networks and green innovation: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    8. Miller, Steve & Qiu, Bin & Wang, Bin & Yang, Tina, 2022. "Monitoring institutional ownership and corporate innovation," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 144-165.
    9. Kang, Jun-Koo & Luo, Juan & Na, Hyun Seung, 2018. "Are institutional investors with multiple blockholdings effective monitors?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 576-602.
    10. Barbara Iannone & Pierdomenico Duttilo & Stefano Antonio Gattone, 2025. "Evaluating the Resilience of ESG Investments in European Markets During Turmoil Periods," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 5006-5020, July.
    11. He, Ye & Pan, Yuetong & Shan, Tao & Zhou, Yanyu, 2025. "ESG rating disagreement and the cost of equity financing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Hidaka, Wataru & Ikeda, Naoshi & Inoue, Kotaro, 2023. "Does engagement by large asset managers enhance governance of target firms?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Jidong Qin & Meijia Wang, 2025. "ESG rating disagreement and bank loan availability: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Gao, Kaijuan & Shen, Hanxiao & Gao, Xi & Chan, Kam C., 2019. "The power of sharing: Evidence from institutional investor cross-ownership and corporate innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 284-296.
    15. Li, Wei-An & Du, Hanyu & He, Feng, 2025. "Mandatory corporate ESG disclosure and default risk – Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Yin, Chao & Ward, Charles & Tsolacos, Sotiris, 2018. "Motivated monitoring: The importance of the institutional investment horizon," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 197-212.
    17. Gilje, Erik P. & Gormley, Todd A. & Levit, Doron, 2020. "Who's paying attention? Measuring common ownership and its impact on managerial incentives," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 152-178.
    18. Sun, Guanglin & Yan, Zian & Gong, Zejun & Li, Mengding, 2025. "The impact of ESG rating divergence on stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. Ghaly, Mohamed & Dang, Viet Anh & Stathopoulos, Konstantinos, 2020. "Institutional investors' horizons and corporate employment decisions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Haozhe Song & Gunnar Rimmel, 2025. "Debtholders' reaction to sustainability reporting regulations: International evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 88-115, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:89:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325025954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.