IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v28y2005i1p1-14.html

Assuring the quality of evaluative information: theory and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Schwartz, Robert
  • Mayne, John

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwartz, Robert & Mayne, John, 2005. "Assuring the quality of evaluative information: theory and practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:28:y:2005:i:1:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(04)00074-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:13931 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Greene, Jennifer C., 1990. "Technical quality versus user responsiveness in evaluation practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 267-274, January.
    3. Schwandt, Thomas A., 1992. "Constructing appropriate and useful metaevaluative frameworks : Further reflections on the ECAETC audit experience," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 95-100, January.
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:13932 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Patel, Mahesh, 2002. "A meta-evaluation, or quality assessment, of the evaluations in this issue, based on the African Evaluation Guidelines: 2002," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 329-332, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peretz, Jean H. & Das, Sujit & Tonn, Bruce E., 2009. "Evaluating knowledge benefits of automotive lightweighting materials R&D projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 300-309, August.
    2. Dunkley, Ria A. & Franklin, Alex, 2017. "Failing better: The stochastic art of evaluating community-led environmental action programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 112-122.
    3. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko & Marek Szafraniec, 2020. "Greenhouse Gases and Circular Economy Issues in Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-36, November.
    4. Stijn Voorst & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2019. "Evaluations as a decent knowledge base? Describing and explaining the quality of the European Commission’s ex-post legislative evaluations," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 625-644, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Braman, Colin & Azzam, Tarek, 2023. "Consequences of survey modification in a program evaluation: An exploratory research on evaluation study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:28:y:2005:i:1:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.