IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v100y2023ics0149718923001167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resolving the practical factors in the healthcare system management by considering a combine approach of AHP and ANP methods

Author

Listed:
  • Attari, Mahdi Yousfi Nejad
  • Moslemi Beirami, Ali Asghar
  • Ala, Ali
  • Jami, Ensiye Neyshabouri

Abstract

Healthcare System Management (HSM) is a technique for integrating technology in public hospitals. Knowledge of strategies and decision-making issues is crucial for improving hospital services during the HSM implementation since it directly impacts the efficiency of the hospital and the level of the patient healthcare system. To address the research gap, this study presents a hybrid decision making model that combines the Analysis Hierarchical Process (AHP) method and the Analytic Network Process (ANP) to select Balanced Scorecard Policy (BSP) indicators for evaluating HSM application in a resource-limited background. The hybrid modeling approach not only assists in allocating resources for the execution of HSM but also in determining the significance of the relationship between each analyzed aspect. The hierarchical structure used in this study's quantitative and qualitative relations assessment can also assist various medical facilities in determining how the evaluation criteria and the resources needed to provide HSM services are related. In addition, the management decision policy is shown by the BSP in a healthcare center by combining the two methods mentioned satisfy the goal of strategy weights and limited resources. Finally, the article results indicate that the proposed method increases the efficiency of decisions and maximizes the can improve the reliability in HSM.

Suggested Citation

  • Attari, Mahdi Yousfi Nejad & Moslemi Beirami, Ali Asghar & Ala, Ali & Jami, Ensiye Neyshabouri, 2023. "Resolving the practical factors in the healthcare system management by considering a combine approach of AHP and ANP methods," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:100:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923001167
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718923001167
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kadir Kaan Göncü & Onur Çetin, 2022. "A Decision Model for Supplier Selection Criteria in Healthcare Enterprises with Dematel ANP Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Gabriella Marcarelli, 2018. "An integrated network model for performance management: a focus on healthcare organisations," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 163-180.
    3. Jicang Xu & Linlin Li & Ming Ren, 2022. "A Hybrid ANP Method for Evaluation of Government Data Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Amir Hossein Sadeghi & Ziyuan Sun & Amirreza Sahebi-Fakhrabad & Hamid Arzani & Robert Handfield, 2023. "A Mixed-Integer Linear Formulation for a Dynamic Modified Stochastic p-Median Problem in a Competitive Supply Chain Network Design," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Hudon, Catherine & Chouinard, Maud-Christine & Brousselle, Astrid & Bisson, Mathieu & Danish, Alya, 2020. "Evaluating complex interventions in real context: Logic analysis of a case management program for frequent users of healthcare services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Hugo Henrique dos Santos & Regiane Máximo de Souza & Aílton Souza Aragão, 2018. "Decision analysis in referrals of children and adolescent victims of violence: An ANP approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(9), pages 1483-1492, September.
    7. Tavana, Madjid & Khosrojerdi, Ghasem & Mina, Hassan & Rahman, Amirah, 2019. "A hybrid mathematical programming model for optimal project portfolio selection using fuzzy inference system and analytic hierarchy process," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salis Deris Artikanur & Widiatmaka & Yudi Setiawan & Marimin, 2023. "An Evaluation of Possible Sugarcane Plantations Expansion Areas in Lamongan, East Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Aliasghar Abbasi Kamardi & Moein Beheshti & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Luis Rocha-Lona, 2022. "Analysing supply chain coordination mechanisms dealing with repurposing challenges during Covid-19 pandemic in an emerging economy: a multi-layer decision making approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1341-1360, December.
    3. Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon, 2022. "An integrated FAHP–ZODP approach for strategic marketing information system project selection," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1792-1809, September.
    4. Govindan, Kannan & Mina, Hassan & Alavi, Behrouz, 2020. "A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: A case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei & Maryam Ghezelbash, 2020. "Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-34, December.
    6. Desjardins, Émilie & Sultan-Taïeb, Hélène & St-Hilaire, France & Vézina, Nicole & Ledoux, Élise & Naji, Rita & Bélanger, Patricia, 2023. "Implementation process evaluation of an ergonomic train the trainer program: How to learn from mechanisms and the temporal structure of processes?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Breton, Mylaine & Smithman, Mélanie Ann & Kreindler, Sara A. & Jbilou, Jalila & Wong, Sabrina T. & Gard Marshall, Emily & Sasseville, Martin & Sutherland, Jason M. & Crooks, Valorie A. & Shaw, Jay & C, 2021. "Designing centralized waiting lists for attachment to a primary care provider: Considerations from a logic analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Antonio J. Sánchez-Garrido & Ignacio J. Navarro & José García & Víctor Yepes, 2022. "An Adaptive ANP & ELECTRE IS-Based MCDM Model Using Quantitative Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Farzad Kiani & Sajjad Nematzadeh & Fateme Aysin Anka & Mine Afacan Findikli, 2023. "Chaotic Sand Cat Swarm Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-47, May.
    10. Tian, Yuanyuan & Bai, Libiao & Wei, Lan & Zheng, Kanyin & Zhou, Xinyu, 2022. "Modeling for project portfolio benefit prediction via a GA-BP neural network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    11. Seyed Farid Ghannadpour & Ali Reza Hoseini & Morteza Bagherpour & Elmira Ahmadi, 2021. "Appraising the triple bottom line utility of sustainable project portfolio selection using a novel multi-criteria house of portfolio," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3396-3437, March.
    12. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Danaitun Pongpatcharatorntep, 2022. "An Improved Intellectual Capital Management Method for Selecting and Prioritizing Intangible-Related Aspects: A Case Study of Small Enterprise in Thailand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:100:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923001167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.