IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v96y2016icp372-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insight of anode reaction for CWS (coal water slurry) electrolysis for hydrogen production

Author

Listed:
  • Ge, Lan
  • Gong, Xuzhong
  • Wang, Zhi
  • Zhao, Lixin
  • Wang, Yuhua
  • Wang, Mingyong

Abstract

Mechanism of CWS (coal water slurry) electrolysis was investigated by using anode reaction kinetics. The results indicated that the activation energies of electrode reaction reduce with the increase in activity of carbon materials. According to the electrode reaction kinetics, the direct oxidation of CWS electrolysis occurred easily under lower concentration of electrolyte and higher concentration of CWS. On the contrary, the indirect oxidation of CWS electrolysis took place. Because of the high oxygen evolution potential of water electrolysis in H2SO4 solution (1.23 V), the direct oxidation of CWS electrolysis mainly occurred under water decomposition potential (0.5–1.23 V). As NaOH solution was used as electrolyte, it was difficult to distinguish direct and indirect oxidation under the low potential (0.4 V). With increasing stirring rate, the electrode reaction activation energies of GWS (graphite water slurry) electrolysis increased slightly and were always lower than 40 kJ/mol. The results indicated that GWS electrolysis was controlled by diffusion and the increase in stirring rate could not reduce the polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge, Lan & Gong, Xuzhong & Wang, Zhi & Zhao, Lixin & Wang, Yuhua & Wang, Mingyong, 2016. "Insight of anode reaction for CWS (coal water slurry) electrolysis for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 372-382.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:372-382
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215017223
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santos, D.M.F. & Šljukić, B. & Sequeira, C.A.C. & Macciò, D. & Saccone, A. & Figueiredo, J.L., 2013. "Electrocatalytic approach for the efficiency increase of electrolytic hydrogen production: Proof-of-concept using platinum--dysprosium alloys," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 486-492.
    2. Gong, Xuzhong & Wang, Mingyong & Liu, Yang & Wang, Zhi & Guo, Zhancheng, 2014. "Variation with time of cell voltage for coal slurry electrolysis in sulfuric acid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 233-239.
    3. Wang, Mingyong & Wang, Zhi & Gong, Xuzhong & Guo, Zhancheng, 2014. "The intensification technologies to water electrolysis for hydrogen production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 573-588.
    4. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 592-602.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Shuai & Zhou, Wei & Ding, Yani & Zhao, Guangbo & Gao, Jihui, 2021. "Fe3+-mediated coal-assisted water electrolysis for hydrogen production: Roles of mineral matter and oxygen-containing functional groups in coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Kou, Kaikai & Zhou, Wei & Chen, Shuai & Gao, Jihui, 2021. "Mechanism investigation of carboxyl functional groups catalytic oxidation in coal assisted water electrolysis cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Ying, Zhi & Geng, Zhen & Zheng, Xiaoyuan & Dou, Binlin & Cui, Guomin, 2022. "Improving water electrolysis assisted by anodic biochar oxidation for clean hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    4. Strizhak, Pavel A. & Vershinina, Ksenia Yu., 2017. "Maximum combustion temperature for coal-water slurry containing petrochemicals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 34-46.
    5. Fan, Yuqiang & Guan, Jun & He, Demin & Hong, Yu & Zhang, Qiumin, 2023. "The influence of inherent minerals on the constant-current electrolysis process of coal-water slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Ju, HyungKuk & Badwal, Sukhvinder & Giddey, Sarbjit, 2018. "A comprehensive review of carbon and hydrocarbon assisted water electrolysis for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 502-533.
    7. Zhou, Wei & Chen, Shuai & Meng, Xiaoxiao & Li, Jiayi & Huang, Yuming & Gao, Jihui & Zhao, Guangbo & He, Yong & Qin, Yukun, 2022. "Two-step coal-assisted water electrolysis for energy-saving hydrogen production at cell voltage of 1.2 V with current densities larger than 150 mA/cm2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ju, HyungKuk & Badwal, Sukhvinder & Giddey, Sarbjit, 2018. "A comprehensive review of carbon and hydrocarbon assisted water electrolysis for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 502-533.
    2. Burton, N.A. & Padilla, R.V. & Rose, A. & Habibullah, H., 2021. "Increasing the efficiency of hydrogen production from solar powered water electrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Ana L. Santos & Maria-João Cebola & Diogo M. F. Santos, 2021. "Towards the Hydrogen Economy—A Review of the Parameters That Influence the Efficiency of Alkaline Water Electrolyzers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-35, May.
    4. Diego Bairrão & João Soares & José Almeida & John F. Franco & Zita Vale, 2023. "Green Hydrogen and Energy Transition: Current State and Prospects in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Fan, Yuqiang & Guan, Jun & He, Demin & Hong, Yu & Zhang, Qiumin, 2023. "The influence of inherent minerals on the constant-current electrolysis process of coal-water slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Woong Hee Lee & Young-Jin Ko & Jung Hwan Kim & Chang Hyuck Choi & Keun Hwa Chae & Hansung Kim & Yun Jeong Hwang & Byoung Koun Min & Peter Strasser & Hyung-Suk Oh, 2021. "High crystallinity design of Ir-based catalysts drives catalytic reversibility for water electrolysis and fuel cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Gómez, Sergio Yesid & Hotza, Dachamir, 2016. "Current developments in reversible solid oxide fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 155-174.
    8. Jiang, Dongyue & Yang, Wenming & Tang, Aikun, 2016. "A refractory selective solar absorber for high performance thermochemical steam reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 286-292.
    9. D.M.F. Santos & J.R.B. Lourenço & D. Macciò & A. Saccone & C.A.C. Sequeira & J.L. Figueiredo, 2020. "Ethanol Electrooxidation at Platinum-Rare Earth (RE = Ce, Sm, Ho, Dy) Binary Alloys," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Darband, Ghasem Barati & Aliofkhazraei, Mahmood & Shanmugam, Sangaraju, 2019. "Recent advances in methods and technologies for enhancing bubble detachment during electrochemical water splitting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Ji, Zhaoqi & Perez-Page, Maria & Chen, Jianuo & Rodriguez, Romeo Gonzalez & Cai, Rongsheng & Haigh, Sarah J. & Holmes, Stuart M., 2021. "A structured catalyst support combining electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide and carbon black for enhanced performance and durability in low-temperature hydrogen fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Boreum & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Projected cost analysis of hybrid methanol production from tri-reforming of methane integrated with various water electrolysis systems: Technical and economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Huang, Yuming & Zhou, Wei & Xie, Liang & Li, Jiayi & He, Yong & Chen, Shuai & Meng, Xiaoxiao & Gao, Jihui & Qin, Yukun, 2022. "Edge and defect sites in porous activated coke enable highly efficient carbon-assisted water electrolysis for energy-saving hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 283-292.
    14. Fiammetta Rita Bianchi & Arianna Baldinelli & Linda Barelli & Giovanni Cinti & Emilio Audasso & Barbara Bosio, 2020. "Multiscale Modeling for Reversible Solid Oxide Cell Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Lin, Chiu-Yue & Nguyen, Thi Mai-Linh & Chu, Chen-Yeon & Leu, Hoang-Jyh & Lay, Chyi-How, 2018. "Fermentative biohydrogen production and its byproducts: A mini review of current technology developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4215-4220.
    16. Yang, Yang & Li, Jun & Yang, Yingrui & Lan, Linghan & Liu, Run & Fu, Qian & Zhang, Liang & Liao, Qiang & Zhu, Xun, 2022. "Gradient porous electrode-inducing bubble splitting for highly efficient hydrogen evolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    17. Ghorbani, Bahram & Zendehboudi, Sohrab & Moradi, Mostafa, 2021. "Development of an integrated structure of hydrogen and oxygen liquefaction cycle using wind turbines, Kalina power generation cycle, and electrolyzer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Chutichai, Bhawasut & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2015. "Parametric analysis of a circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 406-413.
    19. Bellocchi, Sara & De Falco, Marcello & Gambini, Marco & Manno, Michele & Stilo, Tommaso & Vellini, Michela, 2019. "Opportunities for power-to-Gas and Power-to-liquid in CO2-reduced energy scenarios: The Italian case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 847-861.
    20. Makhsoos, Ashkan & Kandidayeni, Mohsen & Boulon, Loïc & Pollet, Bruno G., 2023. "A comparative analysis of single and modular proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers for green hydrogen production- a case study in Trois-Rivières," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:372-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.