IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v79y2015icp325-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergy analysis of synthetic biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading

Author

Listed:
  • Peters, Jens F.
  • Petrakopoulou, Fontina
  • Dufour, Javier

Abstract

This paper presents the first assessment of the exergetic performance of a biorefinery process based on catalytic hydroupgrading of bio-oil from fast pyrolysis. Lignocellulosic biomass is converted into bio-oil through fast pyrolysis, which is then upgraded to synthetic fuels in a catalytic hydrotreating process. The biorefinery process is simulated numerically using commercial software and analyzed using exergetic analysis. Exergy balances are defined for each component of the plant and the exergetic efficiencies and exergy destruction rates are calculated at the component, section and plant level, identifying thermodynamic inefficiencies and revealing the potential for further improvement of the process. The overall biofuel process results in an exergetic efficiency of 60.1%, while the exergetic efficiency of the upgrading process in the biorefinery alone is 77.7%. Within the biorefinery, the steam reforming reactor is the main source of inefficiencies, followed by the two hydrotreating reactors. In spite of the high operating pressures in the hydrotreating section, the compressors have little impact on the total exergy destruction. Compared to competing lignocellulosic biofuel processes, like gasification with Fischer–Tropsch synthesis or lignocellulosic ethanol processes, the examined system achieves a significantly higher exergetic efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Peters, Jens F. & Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Dufour, Javier, 2015. "Exergy analysis of synthetic biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 325-336.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:79:y:2015:i:c:p:325-336
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214012742
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris, David R. & Szargut, Jan, 1986. "Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet earth," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 733-755.
    2. Anselm Eisentraut, 2010. "Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries," IEA Energy Papers 2010/1, OECD Publishing.
    3. Piekarczyk, Wodzisław & Czarnowska, Lucyna & Ptasiński, Krzysztof & Stanek, Wojciech, 2013. "Thermodynamic evaluation of biomass-to-biofuels production systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 95-104.
    4. Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Mosqueira-Salazar, Klever Joao & Modesto, Marcelo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A. & Serra, Luis M. & Lozano, Miguel-Angel, 2013. "Exergetic analysis of the integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production from sugarcane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 46-61.
    5. Meier, Dietrich & van de Beld, Bert & Bridgwater, Anthony V. & Elliott, Douglas C. & Oasmaa, Anja & Preto, Fernando, 2013. "State-of-the-art of fast pyrolysis in IEA bioenergy member countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 619-641.
    6. Iribarren, Diego & Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Dufour, Javier, 2013. "Environmental and thermodynamic evaluation of CO2 capture, transport and storage with and without enhanced resource recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 477-485.
    7. Ahrendts, Joachim, 1980. "Reference states," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(8), pages 666-677.
    8. Vitasari, Caecilia R. & Jurascik, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2011. "Exergy analysis of biomass-to-synthetic natural gas (SNG) process via indirect gasification of various biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3825-3837.
    9. Sues, Anna & Juraščík, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof, 2010. "Exergetic evaluation of 5 biowastes-to-biofuels routes via gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 996-1007.
    10. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    11. Velásquez-Arredondo, H.I. & De Oliveira Junior, S. & Benjumea, P., 2012. "Exergy efficiency analysis of chemical and biochemical stages involved in liquid biofuels production processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 138-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pradhan, Debalaxmi & Bendu, Harisankar & Singh, R.K. & Murugan, S., 2017. "Mahua seed pyrolysis oil blends as an alternative fuel for light-duty diesel engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 600-612.
    2. Peters, Jens F. & Banks, Scott W. & Bridgwater, Anthony V. & Dufour, Javier, 2017. "A kinetic reaction model for biomass pyrolysis processes in Aspen Plus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 595-603.
    3. Qian, Hongliang & Chen, Wei & Zhu, Weiwei & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Guo, Xiaojing & Huang, Dechun & Liang, Xiaodong & Kontogeorgis, Georgios M., 2019. "Simulation and evaluation of utilization pathways of biomasses based on thermodynamic data prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 610-625.
    4. Sudalai, S & Rupesh, K J & Devanesan, M.G & Arumugam, A, 2023. "A critical review of Madhuca indica as an efficient biodiesel producer: Towards sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Piazzi, Stefano & Patuzzi, Francesco & Baratieri, Marco, 2022. "Energy and exergy analysis of different biomass gasification coupled to Fischer-Tropsch synthesis configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Atienza-Martínez, María & Ábrego, Javier & Mastral, José Francisco & Ceamanos, Jesús & Gea, Gloria, 2018. "Energy and exergy analyses of sewage sludge thermochemical treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 723-735.
    7. Forlin Bertel-Pérez & Grisel Cogollo-Cárcamo & Ángel Darío González-Delgado, 2023. "Assessing Exergy Efficiency in Computer-Aided Modeled Large-Scale Production of Chitosan Microbeads Modified with Thiourea and Magnetite Nanoparticles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mandegari, Mohsen & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Farzad, Somayeh & Mojarab Soufiyan, Mohamad & Görgens, Johann F., 2018. "Exergy analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery annexed to a sugarcane mill for simultaneous lactic acid and electricity production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 623-638.
    9. Magdalena Szymańska & Tomasz Sosulski & Ewa Szara & Adam Wąs & Piotr Sulewski & Gijs W.P. van Pruissen & René L. Cornelissen, 2019. "Ammonium Sulphate from a Bio-Refinery System as a Fertilizer—Agronomic and Economic Effectiveness on the Farm Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Whiting, Kai & Carmona, Luis Gabriel & Sousa, Tânia, 2017. "A review of the use of exergy to evaluate the sustainability of fossil fuels and non-fuel mineral depletion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 202-211.
    2. Piazzi, Stefano & Patuzzi, Francesco & Baratieri, Marco, 2022. "Energy and exergy analysis of different biomass gasification coupled to Fischer-Tropsch synthesis configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Li, Sheng & Jin, Hongguang & Gao, Lin & Zhang, Xiaosong, 2014. "Exergy analysis and the energy saving mechanism for coal to synthetic/substitute natural gas and power cogeneration system without and with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 552-561.
    4. Silva Ortiz, Pablo & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2014. "Exergy analysis of pretreatment processes of bioethanol production based on sugarcane bagasse," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 130-138.
    5. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    6. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari & Mousavi, Seyed Ali, 2019. "Evaluation of an optimal integrated design multi-fuel multi-product electrical power plant by energy and exergy analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 61-78.
    7. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Huang, Y.W. & Chen, M.Q. & Li, Y. & Guo, J., 2016. "Modeling of chemical exergy of agricultural biomass using improved general regression neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1164-1175.
    9. Kyrke Gaudreau & Roydon A. Fraser & Stephen Murphy, 2012. "The Characteristics of the Exergy Reference Environment and Its Implications for Sustainability-Based Decision-Making," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Heena Panchasara & Nanjappa Ashwath, 2021. "Effects of Pyrolysis Bio-Oils on Fuel Atomisation—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Xiang, Yangyang & Zhou, Jingsong & Lin, Bowen & Xue, Xiaoao & Tian, Xingtao & Luo, Zhongyang, 2015. "Exergetic evaluation of renewable light olefins production from biomass via synthetic methanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 499-507.
    12. Li, Sheng & Ji, Xiaozhou & Zhang, Xiaosong & Gao, Lin & Jin, Hongguang, 2014. "Coal to SNG: Technical progress, modeling and system optimization through exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 98-109.
    13. Costa, Márcio Macedo & Schaeffer, Roberto & Worrell, Ernst, 2001. "Exergy accounting of energy and materials flows in steel production systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 363-384.
    14. Atsonios, Konstantinos & Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander & D. Panopoulos, Kyriakos & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2015. "Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 346-366.
    15. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & González-Garay, Andrés & Bernardi, Andrea & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Dowell, Niall Mac & Chachuat, Benoit & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Electricity grid decarbonisation or green methanol fuel? A life-cycle modelling and analysis of today′s transportation-power nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    16. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Bejan, Adrian, 2018. "Thermodynamics today," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1208-1219.
    18. Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    19. Lehto, Jani & Oasmaa, Anja & Solantausta, Yrjö & Kytö, Matti & Chiaramonti, David, 2014. "Review of fuel oil quality and combustion of fast pyrolysis bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 178-190.
    20. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2007. "Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 355-376, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:79:y:2015:i:c:p:325-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.