Author
Listed:
- Guo, Su
- Wang, Chen
- Ma, Zherui
- Zhang, Yanjun
- Qin, Zhenkun
- Yan, Jingshu
- Qiao, Yanhan
Abstract
The efficient planning of multi-energy complementary bases necessitates coordinated decision-making across geographical siting, capacity allocation, and dispatch. Prevailing approaches often treat geospatial suitability as a static, upfront constraint, lacking a closed-loop mechanism to dynamically refine siting and capacity decisions based on operational feedback. To bridge this gap, this study proposes a geographic information system-based closed-loop co-optimization framework. The framework seamlessly integrates high-resolution spatial analysis with system-level techno-economic optimization. Specifically, geographic information system-derived multi-criteria site evaluations are quantified and directly embedded as weighting factors in the capacity allocation model, ensuring optimal spatial resource distribution. Subsequently, a hybrid energy storage model co-optimizes net present value and loss of power supply probability. Crucially, the actual loss of power supply probability obtained from the hourly operational simulation is fed back to iteratively adjust the upper-layer capacity configuration, establishing a robust planning-operation feedback loop. A case study of a wind-solar-hydro-coal-storage system in Bortala, China, shows that the framework achieves a 4.58% higher net present value and a 42.27% lower initial investment than conventional open-loop planning, while ensuring 100% renewable accommodation and a 1.64% loss of power supply probability. This work highlights the indispensable role of deeply coupling dynamic operational feedback with granular spatial intelligence for designing high-performance multi-energy systems.
Suggested Citation
Guo, Su & Wang, Chen & Ma, Zherui & Zhang, Yanjun & Qin, Zhenkun & Yan, Jingshu & Qiao, Yanhan, 2026.
"Geographic information system-based closed-loop co-optimization of site-capacity-operation for multi-energy complementary bases,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:347:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226005013
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140398
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:347:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226005013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.