Author
Listed:
- Zhou, Yuankun
- Liu, Zhixiang
- Ruan, Yijia
- Tian, Yafen
- Li, Kang
- Zhang, Hua
Abstract
The thermal management of electric vehicles (EVs) faces a critical challenge in simultaneously maintaining cabin comfort and ensuring battery safety. To tackle this issue, an adaptive control strategy for a CO2 transcritical dual-cooling system is proposed, underpinned by a multiphysics battery model validated experimentally. The model integrates electrochemical, thermal, and aging dynamics, predicting voltage and temperature with high accuracy (maximum errors of 4.2 % and 6.5 %, respectively). Systematic optimization identified a coolant flow rate of 25 L/min to minimize battery temperature difference (ΔT ≤ 0.5 °C) and a 15 % expansion valve opening to balance Coefficient of Performance (COP) with cooling capacity. Dynamic vapor quality regulation at the chiller outlet enhanced system COP by 46.5 % (from 1.29 to 1.89) and reduced optimal discharge pressure by 2.1 %. Compared to a fixed-valve strategy, the variable approach shortened battery cooling time by 38.7 % (from 595 s to 429 s) and increased COP by 3.7 %. The dual-cooling mode reduced battery aging by 10 % but raised energy consumption by 46.4 % versus cabin-only cooling, slightly compromising thermal comfort (Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) = 1.15 vs. target 0.5) and prolonging cabin temperature stabilization by 225 s. At 38 °C ambient temperature, dual-cooling cut driving range by 35 %, with cabin thermal load contributing 77.2 % to the total loss. Under high-speed driving, battery cooling dominated efficiency loss (37.4 %). These findings underscore the essential role of adaptive control in balancing battery durability, cabin comfort, and energy efficiency in next-generation EV thermal systems.
Suggested Citation
Zhou, Yuankun & Liu, Zhixiang & Ruan, Yijia & Tian, Yafen & Li, Kang & Zhang, Hua, 2026.
"Optimization on control strategy for CO2-based dual-cooling thermal management system in electric vehicles,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:343:y:2026:i:c:s0360544225054477
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139804
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:343:y:2026:i:c:s0360544225054477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.