IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v322y2025ics0360544225013635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bidding behaviors of coal-fired units in China's electricity market considering previous capacity revenues based on prospect theory

Author

Listed:
  • Lan, Liuhan
  • Zhang, Xingping
  • Ng, Tsan Sheng
  • Wang, Teng
  • Tan, Qinliang

Abstract

The capacity market is a key tool for ensuring the capacity adequacy and the stability of the novel power system proposed by Chinese government. After introducing capacity market, the bidding behaviors of coal-fired generation units in the electricity market will inevitably be affected by previous capacity revenues. Additionally, there is a significant difference in the operational efficiency of coal-fired units with different technical characteristics in the electricity market. This paper innovatively considers these two factors and proposes a bidding strategy model for coal-fired generation units based on prospect theory and the multi-agent deep reinforcement learning algorithm to explore the impact of previous capacity revenues on monthly electricity market. The economic and environment consequence under different capacity market access mechanisms are evaluated and compared. The results demonstrate that high-efficient units may fail to win bids due to their aggressive bidding strategies, thereby being unable to leverage their technological advantages. After introducing capacity market, the profit per kilowatt-hour of units has increased by 3.31 %, while the carbon emissions have decreased. In addition, different market access mechanisms should be adopted in the capacity market at different stages of market development, which could provide scientific reference for the policymakers to improve the market system.

Suggested Citation

  • Lan, Liuhan & Zhang, Xingping & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Wang, Teng & Tan, Qinliang, 2025. "Bidding behaviors of coal-fired units in China's electricity market considering previous capacity revenues based on prospect theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225013635
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225013635
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Yanchong & Wang, Yubin & Yang, Qiang, 2023. "Bidding strategy design for electric vehicle aggregators in the day-ahead electricity market considering price volatility: A risk-averse approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Mou, Yuting & Papavasiliou, Anthony & Hartz, Katharina & Dusolt, Alexander & Redl, Christian, 2023. "An analysis of shortage pricing and capacity remuneration mechanisms on the pan-European common energy market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Wang, Qi & Huang, Chunyi & Wang, Chengmin & Li, Kangping & Xie, Ning, 2024. "Joint optimization of bidding and pricing strategy for electric vehicle aggregator considering multi-agent interactions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    4. Komorowska, Aleksandra & Benalcazar, Pablo & Kaszyński, Przemysław & Kamiński, Jacek, 2020. "Economic consequences of a capacity market implementation: The case of Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Yu, Liying & Wang, Peng & Chen, Zhe & Li, Dewen & Li, Ning & Cherkaoui, Rachid, 2023. "Finding Nash equilibrium based on reinforcement learning for bidding strategy and distributed algorithm for ISO in imperfect electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    6. Wang, Zhen & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Huo, Jiazhen, 2024. "The bidding strategy for renewable energy auctions under government subsidies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    7. Li, Qirui & Yang, Zhifang & Yu, Juan & Li, Wenyuan, 2023. "Impacts of previous revenues on bidding strategies in electricity market: A quantitative analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    8. Schölzel, Joel David & Henn, Sarah & Tings, Milena & Streblow, Rita & Müller, Dirk, 2024. "Comparative analysis of bidding strategies for auction-based local energy markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    9. Wu, Jiahui & Wang, Jidong & Kong, Xiangyu, 2022. "Strategic bidding in a competitive electricity market: An intelligent method using Multi-Agent Transfer Learning based on reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Shi, Xingping & He, Qing & Liu, Yixue & An, Xugang & Zhang, Qianxu & Du, Dongmei, 2024. "Thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of a novel compressed air energy storage system coupled with coal-fired power unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Guo, Hongye & Chen, Qixin & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2022. "Bidding behaviors of GENCOs under bounded rationality with renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    12. Khezr, Peyman & Nepal, Rabindra, 2021. "On the viability of energy-capacity markets under decreasing marginal costs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Chan, H. Ron & Fell, Harrison & Lange, Ian & Li, Shanjun, 2017. "Efficiency and environmental impacts of electricity restructuring on coal-fired power plants," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-18.
    14. Gore, Olga & Vanadzina, Evgenia & Viljainen, Satu, 2016. "Linking the energy-only market and the energy-plus-capacity market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 52-61.
    15. Miao, Lin & Liu, Ming & Zhang, Kezhen & Zhao, Yongliang & Yan, Junjie, 2023. "Energy, exergy, and economic analyses on coal-fired power plants integrated with the power-to-heat thermal energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    16. Ochoa, Tomás & Gil, Esteban & Angulo, Alejandro & Valle, Carlos, 2022. "Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for efficient multi-timescale bidding of a hybrid power plant in day-ahead and real-time markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    17. Wang, Yubin & Zheng, Yanchong & Yang, Qiang, 2023. "Day-ahead bidding strategy of regional integrated energy systems considering multiple uncertainties in electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    18. Kong, Xiangyu & Liu, Dehong & Xiao, Jie & Wang, Chengshan, 2019. "A multi-agent optimal bidding strategy in microgrids based on artificial immune system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Liu, Yangyang & Zhou, Jiangxin & Zhou, Qihui & Liu, Chuanquan & Yu, Feng, 2023. "Bidding strategy of integrated energy system considering decision maker’s subjective risk aversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    20. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & de Vries, Laurens J. & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2016. "Expert survey on capacity markets in the US: Lessons for the EU," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 11-17.
    21. Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Zimmermann, Florian & Fraunholz, Christoph & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1059-1078.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Komorowska, Aleksandra & Kaszyński, Przemysław & Kamiński, Jacek, 2023. "Where does the capacity market money go? Lessons learned from Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Wu, Shengyang & Ding, Zhaohao & Wang, Jingyu & Shi, Dongyuan, 2023. "Unveiling bidding uncertainties in electricity markets: A Bayesian deep learning framework based on accurate variational inference," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. S. Oliveira, Fernando & William-Rioux, Bertrand & Pierru, Axel, 2023. "Capacity expansion in liberalized electricity markets with locational pricing and renewable energy investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    4. Perica Ilak & Lin Herenčić & Ivan Rajšl & Sara Raos & Željko Tomšić, 2021. "Equilibrium Pricing with Duality-Based Method: Approach for Market-Oriented Capacity Remuneration Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Wang, Qi & Huang, Chunyi & Wang, Chengmin & Li, Kangping & Shafie-khah, Miadreza, 2025. "Risk-averse frequency regulation strategy of electric vehicle aggregator considering multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    6. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & Marcheselli, Anna & Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & De Vries, Laurens J., 2017. "An analysis of a forward capacity market with long-term contracts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 255-267.
    7. Christos K. Simoglou & Pandelis N. Biskas, 2023. "Capacity Mechanisms in Europe and the US: A Comparative Analysis and a Real-Life Application for Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-32, January.
    8. Aliyon, Kasra & Ritvanen, Jouni, 2024. "Deep learning-based electricity price forecasting: Findings on price predictability and European electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    9. Li, Qirui & Yang, Zhifang & Yu, Juan & Li, Wenyuan, 2023. "Impacts of previous revenues on bidding strategies in electricity market: A quantitative analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    10. Alrobaian, Abdulrahman A. & Alsagri, Ali Sulaiman, 2023. "Multi-agent-based energy management for a fully electrified residential consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Zimmermann, Florian & Fraunholz, Christoph & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1059-1078.
    12. Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Zimmermann, Florian & Fraunholz, Christoph & Fichtner, Wolf, 2018. "A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 27, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    13. Wu, Chunlei & Wang, Chao & Hou, Zongyu & Wang, Zhe, 2025. "Flexible peak shaving in coal-fired power plants: A comprehensive review of current challenges, recent advances, and future perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    14. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Camadan, Ercument & Erten, Ibrahim Etem & Zhang, Alex Hongliang, 2023. "Market failure or politics? Understanding the motives behind regulatory actions to address surging electricity prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Simshauser, Paul, 2021. "Vertical integration, peaking plant commitments and the role of credit quality in energy-only markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    16. Florian Zimmermann & Andreas Bublitz & Dogan Keles & Wolf Fichtner, 2021. "Cross-border Effects of Capacity Remuneration Mechanisms: The Swiss Case," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(2), pages 53-90, March.
    17. Mou, Yuting & Papavasiliou, Anthony & Hartz, Katharina & Dusolt, Alexander & Redl, Christian, 2023. "An analysis of shortage pricing and capacity remuneration mechanisms on the pan-European common energy market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Tin Cheuk Leung & Kwok Ping Ping & Kevin K. Tsui, 2019. "What can deregulators deregulate? The case of electricity," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-32, August.
    19. Wang, Zhenpu & Xu, Jing & Ma, Suxia & Zhao, Guanjia & Wang, Jianfei & Gu, Yujiong, 2025. "Comparative investigation on heat pump solutions for peak shaving and heat-power decoupling in combined heat and power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225013635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.