IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v293y2024ics0360544224004717.html

Quantifying the municipal encirclement effect of wind turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Croonenbroeck, Carsten
  • Hennecke, David

Abstract

Citizens may experience discomfort from the feeling of being surrounded by wind power turbines in their municipalities. This effect, usually called “encirclement”, should be prevented during any wind farm planning process. Therefore, there need to be reliable rules for how much encirclement is tolerable and how much is too much. In addition to rules, it is necessary to be able to quantify encirclement accurately. While there is a method to do so currently at hand, that method has several shortcomings. We provide an updated approach that helps drawing a more realistic picture of the actual encirclement situation. In this article, we introduce our GIS (Geographic Information System) procedure. Essentially, the basic idea is to evaluate the sight of wind turbines from points-of-view along a path around the perimeter of a given municipality. We then evaluate the algorithm with some real-world data to also compare our method to the former approach and find that our approach distinguishes between “encircled” or not in a somewhat more strict fashion than the former method does.

Suggested Citation

  • Croonenbroeck, Carsten & Hennecke, David, 2024. "Quantifying the municipal encirclement effect of wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:293:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004717
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224004717
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Min & Liu, Yong & Cui, Caiyun & Xia, Bo & Ke, Yongjian & Skitmore, Martin, 2023. "Social acceptance of NIMBY facilities: A comparative study between public acceptance and the social license to operate analytical frameworks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Knauf, Jakob, 2022. "Can't buy me acceptance? Financial benefits for wind energy projects in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Ryberg, David Severin & Tulemat, Zena & Stolten, Detlef & Robinius, Martin, 2020. "Uniformly constrained land eligibility for onshore European wind power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 921-931.
    4. Johansen, K. & Emborg, J., 2018. "Wind farm acceptance for sale? Evidence from the Danish wind farm co-ownership scheme," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 413-422.
    5. Teschner, Na'ama & Alterman, Rachelle, 2018. "Preparing the ground: Regulatory challenges in siting small-scale wind turbines in urban areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1660-1668.
    6. Maria A. Petrova, 2013. "NIMBYism revisited: public acceptance of wind energy in the United States," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(6), pages 575-601, November.
    7. Müller, Florian Johannes Yanic & Leschinger, Valentin & Hübner, Gundula & Pohl, Johannes, 2023. "Understanding subjective and situational factors of wind turbine noise annoyance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radtke, Jörg & Bohn, Nino S., 2023. "Mind the gap: Community member perceptions of shortcomings in diversity and inclusivity of local energy projects in Germany," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. le Maitre, Julia & Ryan, Geraldine & Power, Bernadette, 2024. "Do concerns about wind farms blow over with time? Residents’ acceptance over phases of project development and proximity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    3. le Maitre, Julia & Ryan, Geraldine & Power, Bernadette & O'Connor, Ellen, 2023. "Empowering onshore wind energy: A national choice experiment on financial benefits and citizen participation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. le Maitre, Julia & Ryan, Geraldine & Power, Bernadette & Sirr, Gordon, 2024. "Mechanisms to promote household investment in wind energy: A national experimental survey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Ioannidis, Romanos & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris, 2020. "A review of land use, visibility and public perception of renewable energy in the context of landscape impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Julien Walzberg & Annika Eberle, 2023. "Modeling Systems’ Disruption and Social Acceptance—A Proof-of-Concept Leveraging Reinforcement Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    8. World Bank, 2024. "Balochistan Renewable Energy Development Study," World Bank Publications - Reports 41876, The World Bank Group.
    9. Johansen, Katinka, 2021. "Blowing in the wind: A brief history of wind energy and wind power technologies in Denmark," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Hamza Cheniti & Kaouther Kerboua & Omar Sekiou & Hani Amir Aouissi & Aissa Benselhoub & Rachida Mansouri & Ibtissem Zeriri & Karima Barbari & Jadranka Blazevska Gilev & Zihad Bouslama, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management within Open Dumping and Landfilling Contexts: A Strategic Analysis and Planning Responses Applicable to Algeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Wagon, Felix & Fridgen, Gilbert & Tiefenbeck, Verena, 2024. "Shaping stable support: Leveraging digital feedback interventions to elicit socio-Political acceptance of renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Federica Daniele & Guido de Blasio & Alessandra Pasquini, 2024. "Is local opposition taking the wind out of the energy transition?," Discussion Paper series in Regional Science & Economic Geography 2024-13, Gran Sasso Science Institute, Social Sciences, revised Dec 2024.
    13. Tourgeman, Miriam & Cohen, Chen & Rubin, Ofir, 2024. "Preserving competition and economic welfare in Israel's PV market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Johansen, K. & Upham, P.J., 2025. "Should end-users take their clothes off inside on a cold winter's day? Sustainability pressures on district heating professionals in Denmark," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    15. Eitan, Avri, 2025. "Navigating sustainability trade-offs in wind energy governance: The role of environmental regulators," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Nguyen, Nhu “Claire” & Johnson, David R., 2024. "The impacts of local wind power objection on the power system of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator area," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    17. Cai, Zhongcheng & Liu, Yong & Shen, Ye & Skitmore, Martin & Yu, Shiwang, 2025. "Addressing community oppositions in biowaste incineration infrastructure: Key factors and strategic solutions for a sustainable circular bioeconomy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Baliatsas, Christos & Yzermans, C. Joris & Hooiveld, Mariette & Kenens, Raymond & Spreeuwenberg, Peter & van Kamp, Irene & Dückers, Michel, 2025. "Health problems near wind turbines: A nationwide epidemiological study based on primary healthcare data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Herkes, Feie J. & Zouridis, Stavros, 2023. "The legitimacy of land use decisions by public authorities in the Netherlands: Results from a survey experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. repec:osf:osfxxx:8cquz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Cao, Jiu Fa & Zhu, Wei Jun & Shen, Wen Zhong & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær & Sun, Zhen Ye, 2020. "Optimizing wind energy conversion efficiency with respect to noise: A study on multi-criteria wind farm layout design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 468-485.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:293:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224004717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.