IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v285y2023ics0360544223028852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodological approach for assessing flexibility and capacity value in renewable-dominated power systems: A Spanish case study in 2030

Author

Listed:
  • Huclin, Sébastien
  • Ramos, Andrés
  • Chaves, José Pablo
  • Matanza, Javier
  • González-Eguino, Mikel

Abstract

Maintaining the security of supply is one of the challenges that system operators face. Variability and uncertainty increase due to the penetration of variable renewable energy sources such as solar and wind, while flexible technologies such as traditional thermal units are phased out to reduce emissions. The current methods for assessing power system adequacy are based on historical operations and are generally intended to be applied to thermal-dominated electricity systems. Therefore, it is necessary to improve current adequacy assessment methods since they usually neglect the flexibility of power systems. This paper presents a methodological approach for jointly assessing the adequacy and flexibility of power systems. The methodology’s usefulness is demonstrated through its application to the Spanish power system. For the case study, results show that new closed-looped pumped storage hydro technology provides 25% flexibility while contributing to adequacy due to higher installed capacity and round-trip efficiency. Due to shorter storage duration, batteries only contribute to flexibility, supplying 16% of the total operating reserves. Therefore, this study shows that metrics of flexibility and individual contribution to the power system adequacy complement each other and simultaneously enable the scarcities of power systems to be observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Huclin, Sébastien & Ramos, Andrés & Chaves, José Pablo & Matanza, Javier & González-Eguino, Mikel, 2023. "A methodological approach for assessing flexibility and capacity value in renewable-dominated power systems: A Spanish case study in 2030," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:285:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223028852
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223028852
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2020. "Quantifying power system flexibility provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Mills, Andrew D. & Rodriguez, Pía, 2020. "A simple and fast algorithm for estimating the capacity credit of solar and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Ciara O'Dwyer & L. (Lisa B.) Ryan & Damian Flynn, 2017. "Efficient large-scale energy storage dispatch: challenges in future high renewables systems," Open Access publications 10197/9103, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    4. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2019. "Multi-temporal assessment of power system flexibility requirement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1327-1336.
    5. Brito-Pereira, Paulo & Mastropietro, Paolo & Rodilla, Pablo & Barroso, Luiz Augusto & Batlle, Carlos, 2022. "Adjusting the aim of capacity mechanisms: Future-proof reliability metrics and firm supply calculations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Zhou, Ella & Cole, Wesley & Frew, Bethany, 2018. "Valuing variable renewable energy for peak demand requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 499-511.
    7. Saarinen, Linn & Tokimatsu, Koji, 2021. "Flexibility metrics for analysis of power system transition - A case study of Japan and Sweden," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 764-772.
    8. Deetjen, Thomas A. & Rhodes, Joshua D. & Webber, Michael E., 2017. "The impacts of wind and solar on grid flexibility requirements in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 637-654.
    9. Ana Werlang & Gabriel Cunha & João Bastos & Juliana Serra & Bruno Barbosa & Luiz Barroso, 2021. "Reliability Metrics for Generation Planning and the Role of Regulation in the Energy Transition: Case Studies of Brazil and Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    10. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z. & Fleming, Peter J., 2017. "Generation expansion planning optimisation with renewable energy integration: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 790-803.
    11. Lund, Peter D. & Lindgren, Juuso & Mikkola, Jani & Salpakari, Jyri, 2015. "Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 785-807.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2020. "Quantifying power system flexibility provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Li, Yanxue & Zhang, Xiaoyi & Gao, Weijun & Ruan, Yingjun, 2020. "Capacity credit and market value analysis of photovoltaic integration considering grid flexibility requirements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 908-919.
    3. Neda Hajibandeh & Mehdi Ehsan & Soodabeh Soleymani & Miadreza Shafie-khah & João P. S. Catalão, 2017. "The Mutual Impact of Demand Response Programs and Renewable Energies: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Nolting, Lars & Praktiknjo, Aaron, 2022. "The complexity dilemma – Insights from security of electricity supply assessments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Lechl, Michael & Fürmann, Tim & de Meer, Hermann & Weidlich, Anke, 2023. "A review of models for energy system flexibility requirements and potentials using the new FLEXBLOX taxonomy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Lynch, Muireann & Bertsch, Valentin, 2020. "Power system impacts of community acceptance policies for renewable energy deployment under storage cost uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 893-912.
    7. Quanhui Che & Suhua Lou & Yaowu Wu & Xiangcheng Zhang & Xuebin Wang, 2019. "Optimal Scheduling of a Multi-Energy Power System with Multiple Flexible Resources and Large-Scale Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Schipfer, F. & Mäki, E. & Schmieder, U. & Lange, N. & Schildhauer, T. & Hennig, C. & Thrän, D., 2022. "Status of and expectations for flexible bioenergy to support resource efficiency and to accelerate the energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Chen, Tao & Pipattanasomporn, Manisa & Rahman, Imran & Jing, Zejia & Rahman, Saifur, 2020. "MATPLAN: A probability-based planning tool for cost-effective grid integration of renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1089-1099.
    10. Scott, Ian J. & Carvalho, Pedro M.S. & Botterud, Audun & Silva, Carlos A., 2019. "Clustering representative days for power systems generation expansion planning: Capturing the effects of variable renewables and energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Wen, Lei & Song, Qianqian, 2023. "ELCC-based capacity value estimation of combined wind - storage system using IPSO algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    12. Flores-Quiroz, Angela & Strunz, Kai, 2021. "A distributed computing framework for multi-stage stochastic planning of renewable power systems with energy storage as flexibility option," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    13. Loisel, Rodica & Lemiale, Lionel, 2018. "Comparative energy scenarios: Solving the capacity sizing problem on the French Atlantic Island of Yeu," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 54-67.
    14. Heggarty, Thomas & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2019. "Multi-temporal assessment of power system flexibility requirement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1327-1336.
    15. Deng, Xu & Lv, Tao & Hou, Xiaoran & Xu, Jie & Pi, Duyang & Liu, Feng & Li, Na, 2022. "Regional disparity of flexibility options for integrating variable renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 641-654.
    16. Perera, A.T.D. & Nik, Vahid M. & Wickramasinghe, P.U. & Scartezzini, Jean-Louis, 2019. "Redefining energy system flexibility for distributed energy system design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Tong Koecklin, Manuel & Fitiwi, Desta & de Carolis, Joseph F. & Curtis, John, 2020. "Renewable electricity generation and transmission network developments in light of public opposition: Insights from Ireland," Papers WP653, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    18. Matthew Gough & Sérgio F. Santos & Mohammed Javadi & Rui Castro & João P. S. Catalão, 2020. "Prosumer Flexibility: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review and Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, May.
    19. Dagoumas, Athanasios S. & Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E., 2019. "Review of models for integrating renewable energy in the generation expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1573-1587.
    20. Gianpiero Colangelo & Gianluigi Spirto & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2021. "Progresses in Analytical Design of Distribution Grids and Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-43, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:285:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223028852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.