IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v282y2023ics0360544223023769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic and economic analysis of organic Rankine cycle combined with flash cycle and ejector

Author

Listed:
  • Niu, Jintao
  • Wang, Jiansheng
  • Liu, Xueling

Abstract

Increasing the net output power of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) can increase the possibility of developing low-medium temperature heat sources. It is equally important to effectively control the system's economy. So, subcritical double-pressure ORC combined with flash cycle and ejector (S-EFDPORC) and transcritical ORC combined with flash cycle and ejector (T-EFDPORC) are proposed in present work. The thermodynamic and economic analyses on five proposed systems within the heat source temperature range of 100 °C–200 °C are conducted. The net output power and levelized energy cost (LEC) are treated as optimization objectives in thermodynamic and economic performance comparisons, respectively. The non-dominated sorting and three multi-objective optimization methods (LINMAP, TOPSIS, and Shannon Entropy) are used to perform the multi-objective optimization. The results show that S-EFDPORC and T-EFDPORC can both effectively improve the net output power compared with subcritical double-pressure ORC (S-DPORC) and transcritical double-pressure ORC (T-DPORC), while subcritical ORC combined with flash cycle and ejector (S-EFORC) can only improve the net output power within a certain temperature range. When the optimization objective is the net output power, compared with S-DPORC and T-DPORC, the growth rate of net output power in S-EFORC is more than 20% when the temperature is below 160 °C. When the temperature of the heat source is below 160 °C or above 180 °C, the growth rates of net output power of S-EFDPORC and T-EFDPORC increase more than 25%. When LEC is treated as optimization objective, compared with S-DPORC and T-DPORC, S-EFORC reduces LEC by more than 10%. S-EFDPORC and T-EFDPORC increase the LEC of the system, and the maximum growth rates of LEC are 30% and 60% respectively, resulting in worse economic performance. With three multi-objective optimization methods, both S-EFDPORC and T-EFDPORC can increase net output power, but their economy will deteriorate at most heat source temperatures. Although S-EFORC increase the net output power when the heat source temperature is below than 177 °C, LEC reduces throughout the heat source temperature range.

Suggested Citation

  • Niu, Jintao & Wang, Jiansheng & Liu, Xueling, 2023. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of organic Rankine cycle combined with flash cycle and ejector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223023769
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223023769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziviani, Davide & Beyene, Asfaw & Venturini, Mauro, 2014. "Advances and challenges in ORC systems modeling for low grade thermal energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 79-95.
    2. Huijun Feng & Lingen Chen & Wei Tang & Yanlin Ge, 2022. "Optimal Design of a Dual-Pressure Steam Turbine for Rankine Cycle Based on Constructal Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    4. Long, R. & Bao, Y.J. & Huang, X.M. & Liu, W., 2014. "Exergy analysis and working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 475-483.
    5. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    6. Huijun Feng & Wei Tang & Lingen Chen & Junchao Shi & Zhixiang Wu, 2021. "Multi-Objective Constructal Optimization for Marine Condensers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Patrick Linke & Athanasios I. Papadopoulos & Panos Seferlis, 2015. "Systematic Methods for Working Fluid Selection and the Design, Integration and Control of Organic Rankine Cycles—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-47, May.
    8. Yang, Wenhao & Feng, Huijun & Chen, Lingen & Ge, Yanlin, 2023. "Power and efficiency optimizations of a simple irreversible supercritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    9. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    10. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    11. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Fan, B.Y. & Ouyang, M.G. & Zhao, Y. & Mu, Q.H., 2011. "Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3406-3418.
    12. Eshaghi, Soroush & Hamrang, Farzad, 2021. "An innovative techno-economic analysis for the selection of an integrated ejector system in the flare gas recovery of a refinery plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    14. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    15. Javanshir, Alireza & Sarunac, Nenad, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis of a simple Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 85-96.
    16. Hong Gao & Chao Liu & Chao He & Xiaoxiao Xu & Shuangying Wu & Yourong Li, 2012. "Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Hu, Shuozhuo & Li, Jian & Yang, Fubin & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization of organic Rankine cycle using hydrofluorolefins (HFOs) based on different target preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Simpson, Michael C. & Chatzopoulou, Maria Anna & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Le Brun, Niccolo & Sapin, Paul & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Technoeconomic analysis of internal combustion engine – organic Rankine cycle systems for combined heat and power in energy-intensive buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1400-1414.
    20. Feng, Huijun & Xie, Zhuojun & Chen, Lingen & Wu, Zhixiang & Xia, Shaojun, 2020. "Constructal design for supercharged boiler superheater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    21. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    22. Stijepovic, Mirko Z. & Papadopoulos, Athanasios I. & Linke, Patrick & Grujic, Aleksandar S. & Seferlis, Panos, 2014. "An exergy composite curves approach for the design of optimum multi-pressure organic Rankine cycle processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 285-298.
    23. Wang, Lingbao & Bu, Xianbiao & Li, Huashan, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization and off-design evaluation of organic rankine cycle (ORC) for low-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    24. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    2. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    3. Li, Jian & Yang, Zhen & Shen, Jun & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2023. "Enhancement effects of adding internal heat exchanger on dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1400-1414.
    5. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    6. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    7. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    9. Xu, Heng & Gao, Naiping & Zhu, Tong, 2016. "Investigation on the fluid selection and evaporation parametric optimization for sub- and supercritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 59-68.
    10. Yang, Xiaoxian & Yang, Fubin & Yang, Fufang, 2023. "Thermo-economic performance limit analysis of combined heat and power systems for optimal working fluid selections," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    11. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    12. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Effects of heat source temperature and mixture composition on the combined superiority of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 436-449.
    13. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    14. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    15. Yang, Fufang & Yang, Fubin & Liu, Qiang & Chu, Qingfu & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of working fluids: What is the highest performance of the sub- and trans-critical organic Rankine cycles?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Kang, Lixia & Tang, Jianping & Liu, Yongzhong, 2020. "Optimal design of an organic Rankine cycle system considering the expected variations on heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Kazemi, Shabnam & Nor, Mohamad Iskandr Mohamad & Teoh, Wen Hui, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an ionic liquid as a new proposed geothermal fluid in different organic Rankine cycles for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Xu, Jinliang & Yu, Chao, 2014. "Critical temperature criterion for selection of working fluids for subcritical pressure Organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 719-733.
    19. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    20. Su, Wen & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai, 2017. "Simultaneous working fluids design and cycle optimization for Organic Rankine cycle using group contribution model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 618-627.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223023769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.