IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v271y2023ics0360544223004693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An energy demand-side management and net metering decision framework

Author

Listed:
  • Wen, Hanguan
  • Liu, Xiufeng
  • Yang, Ming
  • Lei, Bo
  • Cheng, Xu
  • Chen, Zhe

Abstract

Demand side management (DSM) and net metering (NM) are two important strategies that can be used in smart energy management systems to help utilities reduce peak loads and increase the penetration of renewable energy, while also enabling customers to save energy and reduce energy bills. In order to effectively implement DSM and NM programs, it is important to identify the customers who are most likely to benefit from these programs and to quantify the economic impact and benefit for both utilities and end-users. This paper proposes a decision framework that utilizes smart meter data and clustering analysis to identify representative load patterns, and a five-stage method for segmenting load patterns to create a consumption intensity matrix. A fuzzy ensemble based multi-criteria decision making framework is then applied to identify the most potential customer groups and quantify the economic benefit and impact. This paper presents a novel approach for identifying potential customers for DSM and NM programs and developing personalized services for energy demand management. The proposed framework is evaluated through a case study, which demonstrates its robustness in decision making and identifies 13 typical load patterns, seven for weekdays and six for weekends, representing diverse consumption behaviors. The weekday load patterns perform better than the weekend load patterns in terms of the five-stage method.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen, Hanguan & Liu, Xiufeng & Yang, Ming & Lei, Bo & Cheng, Xu & Chen, Zhe, 2023. "An energy demand-side management and net metering decision framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:271:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223004693
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223004693
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Rakesh & Rosen, Marc A., 2011. "A critical review of photovoltaic–thermal solar collectors for air heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3603-3614.
    2. Katarina Urošević & Zoran Gligorić & Igor Miljanović & Čedomir Beljić & Miloš Gligorić, 2021. "Novel Methods in Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Process (MCRAT and RAPS)—Application in the Mining Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Xue, Xue & Wang, Shengwei & Yan, Chengchu & Cui, Borui, 2015. "A fast chiller power demand response control strategy for buildings connected to smart grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 77-87.
    4. Qianyun Wen & Qiyao Yan & Junjie Qu & Yang Liu, 2021. "Fuzzy Ensemble of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Heating Energy Transition in Danish Households," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Chen, Yibo & Zhang, Fengyi & Berardi, Umberto, 2020. "Day-ahead prediction of hourly subentry energy consumption in the building sector using pattern recognition algorithms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 514-529, April.
    7. Satre-Meloy, Aven & Diakonova, Marina & Grünewald, Philipp, 2020. "Cluster analysis and prediction of residential peak demand profiles using occupant activity data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Motlagh, Omid & Berry, Adam & O'Neil, Lachlan, 2019. "Clustering of residential electricity customers using load time series," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 11-24.
    9. Wu, Junqi & Niu, Zhibin & Li, Xiang & Huang, Lizhen & Nielsen, Per Sieverts & Liu, Xiufeng, 2023. "Understanding multi-scale spatiotemporal energy consumption data: A visual analysis approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    10. Scott, Ian J. & Carvalho, Pedro M.S. & Botterud, Audun & Silva, Carlos A., 2019. "Clustering representative days for power systems generation expansion planning: Capturing the effects of variable renewables and energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Räsänen, Teemu & Voukantsis, Dimitrios & Niska, Harri & Karatzas, Kostas & Kolehmainen, Mikko, 2010. "Data-based method for creating electricity use load profiles using large amount of customer-specific hourly measured electricity use data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3538-3545, November.
    12. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    13. Niu, Zhibin & Wu, Junqi & Liu, Xiufeng & Huang, Lizhen & Nielsen, Per Sieverts, 2021. "Understanding energy demand behaviors through spatio-temporal smart meter data analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Ruhang, Xu, 2020. "Efficient clustering for aggregate loads: An unsupervised pretraining based method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    15. Valeriya Azarova & Dominik Engel & Cornelia Ferner & Andrea Kollmann & Johannes Reichl, 2018. "Exploring the impact of network tariffs on household electricity expenditures using load profiles and socio-economic characteristics," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 317-325, April.
    16. Ioannis Panapakidis & Nikolaos Asimopoulos & Athanasios Dagoumas & Georgios C. Christoforidis, 2017. "An Improved Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm for the Implementation of Demand Side Management Measures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-42, September.
    17. Tiwari, G.N. & Mishra, R.K. & Solanki, S.C., 2011. "Photovoltaic modules and their applications: A review on thermal modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2287-2304, July.
    18. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for the Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Household: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haixia Gu & Gaojun Liu & Jixue Li & Hongyun Xie & Hanguan Wen, 2023. "A Framework Based on Deep Learning for Predicting Multiple Safety-Critical Parameter Trends in Nuclear Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Wenjun & Wang, Hao & Lee, Xian-Long & Yang, Hong-Tzer, 2022. "Machine learning approach to uncovering residential energy consumption patterns based on socioeconomic and smart meter data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    3. Tanoto, Yusak & Haghdadi, Navid & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2020. "Clustering based assessment of cost, security and environmental tradeoffs with possible future electricity generation portfolios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Li, Wenqiang & Gong, Guangcai & Fan, Houhua & Peng, Pei & Chun, Liang & Fang, Xi, 2021. "A clustering-based approach for “cross-scale” load prediction on building level in HVAC systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    5. Ren, Haoshan & Sun, Yongjun & Albdoor, Ahmed K. & Tyagi, V.V. & Pandey, A.K. & Ma, Zhenjun, 2021. "Improving energy flexibility of a net-zero energy house using a solar-assisted air conditioning system with thermal energy storage and demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Ahir, Rajesh K. & Chakraborty, Basab, 2023. "A data-driven analytic approach for investigation of electricity demand variability for energy conservation programs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    7. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    9. Kuang-Hua Hu & Wei Jianguo & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2017. "Risk Factor Assessment Improvement for China’s Cloud Computing Auditing Using a New Hybrid MADM Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 737-777, May.
    10. Maghsoodi, Abtin Ijadi, 2023. "Cryptocurrency portfolio allocation using a novel hybrid and predictive big data decision support system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Serafim Opricovic, 2009. "A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1549-1561, June.
    12. Ioannis Sitaridis & Fotis Kitsios, 2020. "Competitiveness analysis and evaluation of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a multi-criteria approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 377-399, November.
    13. Sirirat Sae Lim & Hong Ngoc Nguyen & Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Exploring the Development Strategies of Science Parks Using the Hybrid MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    14. Zeynep Gamze Mert & Gülşen Akman, 2011. "The Profile of the Organized Industrial Zones in Kocaeli/TURKEY," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1137, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Haji Vahabzadeh, Ali & Asiaei, Arash & Zailani, Suhaiza, 2015. "Reprint of “Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method”," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 334-347.
    16. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Saja Kosanović & Mirjana Miletić & Ljubo Marković, 2021. "Energy Refurbishment of Family Houses in Serbia in Line with the Principles of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Hsu, C.-H. & Wang, Fu-Kwun & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2012. "The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 95-111.
    19. Junling Zhang & Gajanan G. Hegde & Jennifer Shang & Xiaowen Qi, 2016. "Evaluating Emergency Response Solutions for Sustainable Community Development by Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approaches: IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Kao, Ya-Ling & Kuo, Szu-Yu, 2023. "Exploring the critical factors influencing the outlying island talent recruitment and selection evaluation model: Empirical evidence from Penghu, Taiwan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:271:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223004693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.