IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v231y2021ics0360544221010318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative sustainability evaluations of hybrid combined cooling, heating, and power schemes integrated with solar technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jiangjiang
  • Zhou, Yuan
  • Lior, Noam
  • Zhang, Guoqing

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel quantitative sustainability evaluation model of hybrid natural gas combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) systems integrated with solar technologies, including sustainability indicator selection, normalization, weighting, aggregation, application, and sensitivity analysis. Three hybrid CCHP schemes respectively integrated with stationary and concentrating solar heat collectors and photovoltaic/thermal collectors and two natural gas CCHP schemes are configured and compared. Eleven indicators considering resources, technology, economics, environment and society were selected to estimate a composite sustainability index (CSI) for each of the five CCHP schemes. The “combined weighting” method was employed to define the indicators' weights, which combines subjective opinion of experts in the analytic hierarchy process method and the objective information of quantitative data in the information entropy method. The aggregated CSI provides a unique value for indicating the sustainability degree of schemes that is proportional to it. The results for a defined specific case demonstrate that the hybrid system integrated with stationary evacuated tube collectors has the largest CSI (0.868) and that the CSI of natural gas CCHP system, 0.756, is declined to 0.753 because of integrating the concentrating PV/T collector. The CSI provides a quantitative method to calculate the penalty cost of a scheme's negative environmental and social impact according to the economic cost of energy products, in which the dimensionless impact adjustment factor represents the magnitude of environmental and social impact. When the impact adjustment factor is set to 1.0, the lowest penalty cost of hybrid schemes accounts for 13.2% of total cost of energy product. The sensitivity analysis of indicator weights demonstrated the reliability of final evaluation results of the proposed quantitative sustainability evaluation model for hybrid CCHP schemes, and the comparisons with the conventional techno-economic model validated the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jiangjiang & Zhou, Yuan & Lior, Noam & Zhang, Guoqing, 2021. "Quantitative sustainability evaluations of hybrid combined cooling, heating, and power schemes integrated with solar technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:231:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221010318
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221010318
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Kun & Ding, Yan & Zhu, Neng & Yang, Fan & Wang, Qiaochu, 2018. "Multi-criteria integrated evaluation of distributed energy system for community energy planning based on improved grey incidence approach: A case study in Tianjin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 352-363.
    2. von Wirth, Timo & Gislason, Linda & Seidl, Roman, 2018. "Distributed energy systems on a neighborhood scale: Reviewing drivers of and barriers to social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2618-2628.
    3. Elena Arce, María & Saavedra, Ángeles & Míguez, José L. & Granada, Enrique, 2015. "The use of grey-based methods in multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 924-932.
    4. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Shi, Guo-Hua & Zhang, Xu-Tao, 2008. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3823-3832, October.
    5. Wang, Jiangjiang & Zhai, Zhiqiang John & Zhang, Chunfa & Jing, Youyin, 2010. "Environmental impact analysis of BCHP system in different climate zones in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4208-4216.
    6. Jing, Rui & Wang, Meng & Brandon, Nigel & Zhao, Yingru, 2017. "Multi-criteria evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell based combined cooling heating and power (SOFC-CCHP) applications for public buildings in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 273-289.
    7. Zoellner, Jan & Schweizer-Ries, Petra & Wemheuer, Christin, 2008. "Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4136-4141, November.
    8. Reddy, K.S. & Ravi Kumar, K. & Ajay, C.S., 2015. "Experimental investigation of porous disc enhanced receiver for solar parabolic trough collector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 308-319.
    9. Shafieian, Abdellah & Khiadani, Mehdi & Nosrati, Ataollah, 2018. "A review of latest developments, progress, and applications of heat pipe solar collectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 273-304.
    10. Wang, Jiangjiang & Han, Zepeng & Guan, Zhimin, 2020. "Hybrid solar-assisted combined cooling, heating, and power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Wang, Jiangjiang & Zhai, Zhiqiang (John) & Jing, Youyin & Zhang, Chunfa, 2011. "Influence analysis of building types and climate zones on energetic, economic and environmental performances of BCHP systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 3097-3112.
    12. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    13. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Hamdullahpur, Feridun & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2012. "Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 161-172.
    14. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    15. Lior, Noam & Zhang, Na, 2007. "Energy, exergy, and Second Law performance criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 281-296.
    16. Selbaş, Reşat & Kızılkan, Önder & Şencan, Arzu, 2006. "Thermoeconomic optimization of subcooled and superheated vapor compression refrigeration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 2108-2128.
    17. Croucher, Matt, 2011. "Capacity factors and solar job creation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 6914-6915.
    18. Wang, Jiangjiang & Chen, Yuzhu & Lior, Noam & Li, Weihua, 2019. "Energy, exergy and environmental analysis of a hybrid combined cooling heating and power system integrated with compound parabolic concentrated-photovoltaic thermal solar collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 463-476.
    19. Wang, Jiangjiang & Li, Meng & Ren, Fukang & Li, Xiaojing & Liu, Boxiang, 2018. "Modified exergoeconomic analysis method based on energy level with reliability consideration: Cost allocations in a biomass trigeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 104-116.
    20. Wang, Jiangjiang & Mao, Tianzhi & Wu, Jing, 2017. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling and analysis of combined cooling heating and power system integrated with biomass-steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 871-882.
    21. Wei, Max & Patadia, Shana & Kammen, Daniel M., 2010. "Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 919-931, February.
    22. Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2008. "Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1074-1089, March.
    23. Ludin, Norasikin Ahmad & Mustafa, Nur Ifthitah & Hanafiah, Marlia M. & Ibrahim, Mohd Adib & Asri Mat Teridi, Mohd & Sepeai, Suhaila & Zaharim, Azami & Sopian, Kamaruzzaman, 2018. "Prospects of life cycle assessment of renewable energy from solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 11-28.
    24. Wang, Jiangjiang & Lu, Zherui & Li, Meng & Lior, Noam & Li, Weihua, 2019. "Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental (4E) analysis of a distributed generation solar-assisted CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) gas turbine system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1246-1258.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Zepeng & Wang, Jiangjiang & Cui, Zhiheng & Lu, Chunyan & Qi, Xiaoling, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis for a novel full-spectrum solar-assisted methanol combined cooling, heating, and power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Yan, Rujing & Wang, Jiangjiang & Wang, Jiahao & Tian, Lei & Tang, Saiqiu & Wang, Yuwei & Zhang, Jing & Cheng, Youliang & Li, Yuan, 2022. "A two-stage stochastic-robust optimization for a hybrid renewable energy CCHP system considering multiple scenario-interval uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Chen, Yuzhu & Hua, Huilian & Xu, Jinzhao & Yun, Zhonghua & Wang, Jun & Lund, Peter D., 2022. "Techno-economic cost assessment of a combined cooling heating and power system coupled to organic Rankine cycle with life cycle method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    4. Chen, Yuzhu & Wang, Jiangjiang & Ma, Chaofan & Gao, Yuefen, 2019. "Thermo-ecological cost assessment and optimization for a hybrid combined cooling, heating and power system coupled with compound parabolic concentrated-photovoltaic thermal solar collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 479-492.
    5. Wang, Jiangjiang & Liu, Yi & Ren, Fukang & Lu, Shuaikang, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization and selection of hybrid combined cooling, heating and power systems considering operational flexibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Chen, Yuzhu & Hua, Huilian & Wang, Jun & Lund, Peter D., 2021. "Thermodynamic performance analysis and modified thermo-ecological cost optimization of a hybrid district heating system considering energy levels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Ren, Fukang & Wei, Ziqing & Zhai, Xiaoqiang, 2022. "A review on the integration and optimization of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    8. Wang, Jiangjiang & Chen, Yuzhu & Lior, Noam & Li, Weihua, 2019. "Energy, exergy and environmental analysis of a hybrid combined cooling heating and power system integrated with compound parabolic concentrated-photovoltaic thermal solar collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 463-476.
    9. Wang, Jiangjiang & Han, Zepeng & Guan, Zhimin, 2020. "Hybrid solar-assisted combined cooling, heating, and power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Chen, Yuzhu & Xu, Jinzhao & Wang, Jun & Lund, Peter D., 2021. "Exergo-environmental cost optimization of a combined cooling, heating and power system using the emergy concept and equivalent emissions as ecological boundary," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    12. Han, Jie & Ouyang, Leixin & Xu, Yuzhen & Zeng, Rong & Kang, Shushuo & Zhang, Guoqiang, 2016. "Current status of distributed energy system in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 288-297.
    13. Claudia Rahmann & Oscar Núñez & Felipe Valencia & Susana Arrechea & Jalel Sager & Daniel Kammen, 2016. "Methodology for Monitoring Sustainable Development of Isolated Microgrids in Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Jin Wu & Jiangjiang Wang & Jing Wu & Chaofan Ma, 2019. "Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power System Based on Solar Thermal Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Mahdavi, Navid & Mojaver, Parisa & Khalilarya, Shahram, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of power, CO2 emission and exergy efficiency of a novel solar-assisted CCHP system using RSM and TOPSIS coupled method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 506-524.
    16. Li, Miao & Mu, Hailin & Li, Nan & Ma, Baoyu, 2016. "Optimal design and operation strategy for integrated evaluation of CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 202-220.
    17. Bilgili, Faik & Zarali, Fulya & Ilgün, Miraç Fatih & Dumrul, Cüneyt & Dumrul, Yasemin, 2022. "The evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for sustainable development in Turkey using ‌intuitionistic‌ ‌fuzzy‌-TOPSIS method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1443-1458.
    18. Troldborg, Mads & Heslop, Simon & Hough, Rupert L., 2014. "Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1173-1184.
    19. Kurka, Thomas & Blackwood, David, 2013. "Participatory selection of sustainability criteria and indicators for bioenergy developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 92-102.
    20. Shen, Yung-Chi & Lin, Grace T.R. & Li, Kuang-Pin & Yuan, Benjamin J.C., 2010. "An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4604-4616, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:231:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221010318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.