IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v173y2019icp151-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance improvement of polymer fuel cell by simultaneously inspection of catalyst loading, catalyst content and ionomer using home-made cathodic half-cell and response surface method

Author

Listed:
  • Roudbari, Mohsen Najafi
  • Ojani, Reza
  • Raoof, Jahan Bakhsh

Abstract

The catalyst layer (CL) is the most important component in proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance. Owing the properties of proton exchanging of Nafion, catalytic activity of Pt and electron transfer of carbon support, electrodes are prepared with different amounts of Nafion content, Pt loading and Pt% which are the catalyst layer composition parameters. Here we demonstrate the impact of these parameters to improve the performance of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in PEM fuel cell applications. Nafion content, Pt loading and Pt:MWCNTs percent are varied from 11 to 33 wt%, 0.1–0.5 mg cm−2 and 10 to 30 wt%, respectively. These parameters are investigated using a catalyst coated membrane electrode (CCME) assembling technique which is placed inside an in-house cathodic half-cell. Half-cell setup is used as an ex situ method in fuel cell studies, because it is the fastest and most cost-effective method for quick selection of electrode materials. The CCME composition conditions are investigated by design of experiment (DOE) proceeding which is performed with the response surface method (RSM) using the central composite design (CCD). The CCME is prepared with a Nafion 117 membrane and gas diffusion layer (GDL) having an active area of 0.785 cm2. The half-cell test results show that electrode with 0.50 mg cm−2 Pt loading, 28.78 wt% Pt% and 11.00 wt% Nafion in CL which predicted by mathematical model in the RSM, exhibits promoted behavior in ORR. The CCME with the predicted parameters shows the highest performance of 29.63 mW cm−2, which is confirmed experimentally.

Suggested Citation

  • Roudbari, Mohsen Najafi & Ojani, Reza & Raoof, Jahan Bakhsh, 2019. "Performance improvement of polymer fuel cell by simultaneously inspection of catalyst loading, catalyst content and ionomer using home-made cathodic half-cell and response surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 151-161.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:173:y:2019:i:c:p:151-161
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219302774
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trongchuankij, Wiruyn & Poochinda, Kunakorn & Pruksathorn, Kejvalee & Hunsom, Mali, 2010. "A study on novel combined processes for preparation of high performance Pt–Co/C electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction in PEM fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2839-2843.
    2. Esmaeilifar, A. & Rowshanzamir, S. & Eikani, M.H. & Ghazanfari, E., 2010. "Synthesis methods of low-Pt-loading electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3941-3957.
    3. Avasarala, Bharat & Haldar, Pradeep, 2013. "Durability and degradation mechanism of titanium nitride based electrocatalysts for PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 545-553.
    4. Polterovich, Victor & Popov, Vladimir, 2006. "Эволюционная Теория Экономической Политики: Часть I: Опыт Быстрого Развития [An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Policy: Part I: The Experience of Fast Development]," MPRA Paper 22168, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Okur, Osman & İyigün Karadağ, Çiğdem & Boyacı San, Fatma Gül & Okumuş, Emin & Behmenyar, Gamze, 2013. "Optimization of parameters for hot-pressing manufacture of membrane electrode assembly for PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells) fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 574-580.
    6. Therdthianwong, Apichai & Manomayidthikarn, Phochan & Therdthianwong, Supaporn, 2007. "Investigation of membrane electrode assembly (MEA) hot-pressing parameters for proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 2401-2411.
    7. Najafi Roudbari, Mohsen & Ojani, Reza & Raoof, Jahan Bakhsh, 2017. "Investigation of hot pressing parameters for manufacture of catalyst-coated membrane electrode (CCME) for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells by response surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 794-803.
    8. Taymaz, Imdat & Akgun, Fehmi & Benli, Merthan, 2011. "Application of response surface methodology to optimize and investigate the effects of operating conditions on the performance of DMFC," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1155-1160.
    9. Bhavani, Perumal & Sangeetha, Dharmalingam, 2011. "Preparation and characterization of proton exchange membrane based on SPSEBS/PSU blends for fuel cell applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3360-3369.
    10. Khan, Aziz & Nath, Bhabesh Kumar & Chutia, Joyanti, 2015. "Conical nano-structure arrays of Platinum cathode catalyst for enhanced cell performance in PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1769-1774.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Dongfang & Pan, Lyuming & Pei, Pucheng & Huang, Shangwei & Ren, Peng & Song, Xin, 2021. "Carbon-coated oxygen vacancies-rich Co3O4 nanoarrays grow on nickel foam as efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for rechargeable zinc-air batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Mohammadi, Maryam & Mehdipour-Ataei, Shahram, 2020. "Durable sulfonated partially fluorinated polysulfones as membrane for PEM fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 421-430.
    3. Lin, Rui & Wang, Hong & Zhu, Yu, 2021. "Optimizing the structural design of cathode catalyst layer for PEM fuel cells for improving mass-specific power density," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    4. Roudbari, Mohsen Najafi & Ojani, Reza & Raoof, Jahan Bakhsh, 2020. "Nitrogen functionalized carbon nanotubes as a support of platinum electrocatalysts for performance improvement of ORR using fuel cell cathodic half-cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1015-1028.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahnavard, Aylin & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Amirkhanlou, Gholam Reza, 2015. "The effect of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) as the electrode ionomer for self-humidifying nanocomposite proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 746-757.
    2. Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Gashoul, Fatemeh, 2017. "Comprehensive investigation of physicochemical and electrochemical properties of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation for proton exchange membrane fuel ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 614-628.
    3. Mirzaei, Farokh & Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Rowshanzamir, Soosan, 2017. "Durability investigation and performance study of hydrothermal synthesized platinum-multi walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 696-705.
    4. Najafi Roudbari, Mohsen & Ojani, Reza & Raoof, Jahan Bakhsh, 2017. "Investigation of hot pressing parameters for manufacture of catalyst-coated membrane electrode (CCME) for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells by response surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 794-803.
    5. Sayadi, Parvin & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Parnian, Mohammad Javad, 2016. "Study of hydrogen crossover and proton conductivity of self-humidifying nanocomposite proton exchange membrane based on sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 292-303.
    6. Chaisubanan, Napapat & Maniwan, Witchaya & Hunsom, Mali, 2017. "Effect of heat-treatment on the performance of PtM/C (M = Cr, Pd, Co) catalysts towards the oxygen reduction reaction in PEM fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 454-461.
    7. Ismail, M.S. & Ingham, D.B. & Ma, L. & Hughes, K.J. & Pourkashanian, M., 2017. "Effects of catalyst agglomerate shape in polymer electrolyte fuel cells investigated by a multi-scale modelling framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 420-430.
    8. Sahoo, Madhumita & Ramaprabhu, S., 2017. "Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped porous carbon – is an efficient electrocatalyst as platinum or a hoax for oxygen reduction reaction in acidic environment PEM fuel cell?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1075-1083.
    9. Chou, Chang-Chen & Liu, Cheng-Hong & Chen, Bing-Hung, 2014. "Effects of reduction temperature and pH value of polyol process on reduced graphene oxide supported Pt electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 231-238.
    10. Yang, H.N. & Lee, D.C. & Park, K.W. & Kim, W.J., 2015. "Platinum–boron doped graphene intercalated by carbon black for cathode catalyst in proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 500-510.
    11. Thanasilp, Sarawalee & Hunsom, Mali, 2011. "Effect of Pt: Pd atomic ratio in Pt–Pd/C electrocatalyst-coated membrane on the electrocatalytic activity of ORR in PEM fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1795-1801.
    12. Kakaei, Karim & Gharibi, Hussien, 2014. "Palladium nanoparticle catalysts synthesis on graphene in sodium dodecyl sulfate for oxygen reduction reaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 166-171.
    13. Alipour Moghaddam, Jafar & Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Rowshanzamir, Soosan, 2018. "Preparation, characterization, and electrochemical properties investigation of recycled proton exchange membrane for fuel cell applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 699-709.
    14. Kritana Prueksakorn & Cheng-Xu Piao & Hyunchul Ha & Taehyeung Kim, 2015. "Computational and Experimental Investigation for an Optimal Design of Industrial Windows to Allow Natural Ventilation during Wind-Driven Rain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Yirigui Yirigui & Sang-Woo Lee & A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi & Matthew R. Herman & Jong-Won Lee, 2019. "Relationships between Riparian Forest Fragmentation and Biological Indicators of Streams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Huang, Yu-Xian & Cheng, Chin-Hsiang & Wang, Xiao-Dong & Jang, Jiin-Yuh, 2010. "Effects of porosity gradient in gas diffusion layers on performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4786-4794.
    17. Vladimir Popov, 2009. "Why the West Became Rich before China and Why China Has Been Catching Up with the West since 1949: nother Explanation of the “Great Divergence” and “Great Convergence” Stories," Working Papers w0132, New Economic School (NES).
    18. George Pavlidis & Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis, 2018. "Environmental Benefits and Control of Pollution to Surface Water and Groundwater by Agroforestry Systems: a Review," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 1-29, January.
    19. Grzegorz W. Kolodko, 2009. "A Two-thirds Rate of Success: Polish Transformation and Economic Development, 1989-2008," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2009-14, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Kudrin, A. & Gurvich, E., 2015. "Government Stimulus or Economic Incentives?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 179-186.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:173:y:2019:i:c:p:151-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.