IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v141y2017icp358-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and pH on dark fermentative hydrogen production from glycerol

Author

Listed:
  • Silva-Illanes, Fernando
  • Tapia-Venegas, Estela
  • Schiappacasse, M. Cristina
  • Trably, Eric
  • Ruiz-Filippi, Gonzalo

Abstract

Hydrogen is a promising alternative of clean energy carrier which can be biologically produced from glycerol-rich waste an abundant and economic source of substrate. However, continuous hydrogen-producing systems still need to be improved and in particular by manipulating the only few available operating conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the two main operational parameters, ie. pH and hydraulic retention time (HRT) on hydrogen yields and microbial community structures. For that, a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) was first inoculated with an enriched mixed microflora and was then fed with glycerol. A strong influence of these two operational parameters was shown on hydrogen yields where the maximum yield (0.58 ± 0.13 molH2mol−1glycerol) was achieved at pH 5.5 - HRT 12 h and was 28.5 times higher than the minimum (0.02 ± 0.02 molH2mol−1glycerol) obtained at pH 5.0 - HRT 14 h. Changes in most dominant microbial populations were mainly influenced by the pH. Interestingly, HRT parameter related to changes in the metabolic patterns and influenced the composition of subdominant microorganisms, suggesting they might have a key role in changing the ability of the consortium and/or the activity of dominant microorganisms to produce hydrogen.

Suggested Citation

  • Silva-Illanes, Fernando & Tapia-Venegas, Estela & Schiappacasse, M. Cristina & Trably, Eric & Ruiz-Filippi, Gonzalo, 2017. "Impact of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and pH on dark fermentative hydrogen production from glycerol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 358-367.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:141:y:2017:i:c:p:358-367
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217315943
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghimire, Anish & Frunzo, Luigi & Pirozzi, Francesco & Trably, Eric & Escudie, Renaud & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2015. "A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: Process parameters and use of by-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-95.
    2. Schwengber, Carine Aline & Alves, Helton José & Schaffner, Rodolfo Andrade & da Silva, Fernando Alves & Sequinel, Rodrigo & Bach, Vanessa Rossato & Ferracin, Ricardo José, 2016. "Overview of glycerol reforming for hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 259-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sittijunda, Sureewan & Reungsang, Alissara, 2020. "Valorization of crude glycerol into hydrogen, 1,3-propanediol, and ethanol in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor under thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 361-372.
    2. Srirugsa, Tanawat & Prasertsan, Suteera & Theppaya, Thanansak & Leevijit, Theerayut & Prasertsan, Poonsuk, 2019. "Appropriate mixing speeds of Rushton turbine for biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent in a continuous stirred tank reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 823-830.
    3. Liu, Yuxiang & Liang, Tao & Yuan, Xin & Lv, Yongkang, 2019. "The performance of COD removal and hydrogen production in a single stage system from starch using the consortium PB-Z under simulated natural conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 951-958.
    4. Singh, Neeraj Kumar & Kumari, Priyanka & Singh, Rajesh, 2021. "Intensified hydrogen yield using hydrogenase rich sulfate-reducing bacteria in bio-electrochemical system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    2. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    3. Vira Hovorukha & Olesia Havryliuk & Galina Gladka & Oleksandr Tashyrev & Antonina Kalinichenko & Monika Sporek & Agnieszka Dołhańczuk-Śródka, 2021. "Hydrogen Dark Fermentation for Degradation of Solid and Liquid Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Lopez-Hidalgo, Angel M. & Alvarado-Cuevas, Zazil D. & De Leon-Rodriguez, Antonio, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from mixtures of agro-industrial wastes: Chemometric analysis, optimization and scaling up," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 32-41.
    5. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    6. Sun, Chihe & Xia, Ao & Liao, Qiang & Fu, Qian & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xun & Wei, Pengfei & Lin, Richen & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Improving production of volatile fatty acids and hydrogen from microalgae and rice residue: Effects of physicochemical characteristics and mix ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1082-1092.
    7. Bakonyi, Péter & Buitrón, Germán & Valdez-Vazquez, Idania & Nemestóthy, Nándor & Bélafi-Bakó, Katalin, 2017. "A novel gas separation integrated membrane bioreactor to evaluate the impact of self-generated biogas recycling on continuous hydrogen fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 813-823.
    8. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.
    9. Chen, Yi-di & Li, Suping & Ho, Shih-Hsin & Wang, Chengyu & Lin, Yen-Chang & Nagarajan, Dillirani & Chang, Jo-Shu & Ren, Nan-qi, 2018. "Integration of sludge digestion and microalgae cultivation for enhancing bioenergy and biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 76-90.
    10. Lavagnolo, Maria Cristina & Girotto, Francesca & Rafieenia, Razieh & Danieli, Luciano & Alibardi, Luca, 2018. "Two-stage anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste – Effects of process conditions during batch tests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 14-20.
    11. Liu, Xinxin & Zhao, Junhui & He, Chao & Liu, Liang & Li, Gang & Pan, Xiaohui & Xu, Guizhuan & Lu, Chaoyang & Zhang, Quanguo & Jiao, Youzhou, 2023. "A new approach for evaluating photosynthetic bio-hydrogen production: The dissipation rate method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    12. Aubaid Ullah & Nur Awanis Hashim & Mohamad Fairus Rabuni & Mohd Usman Mohd Junaidi, 2023. "A Review on Methanol as a Clean Energy Carrier: Roles of Zeolite in Improving Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.
    13. Rajat Kumar Sharma & Mohammad Ali Nazari & Juma Haydary & Triveni Prasad Singh & Sandip Mandal, 2023. "A Review on Advanced Processes of Biohydrogen Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass with Special Emphasis on Thermochemical Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    14. He, Quan (Sophia) & McNutt, Josiah & Yang, Jie, 2017. "Utilization of the residual glycerol from biodiesel production for renewable energy generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-76.
    15. Chalima, Angelina & Taxeidis, George & Topakas, Evangelos, 2020. "Optimization of the production of docosahexaenoic fatty acid by the heterotrophic microalga Crypthecodinium cohnii utilizing a dark fermentation effluent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 102-109.
    16. Tian, Hailin & Li, Jie & Yan, Miao & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    17. Moreira, Rui & Bimbela, Fernando & Gandía, Luis M. & Ferreira, Abel & Sánchez, Jose Luis & Portugal, António, 2021. "Oxidative steam reforming of glycerol. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Trchounian, Karen & Poladyan, Anna & Trchounian, Armen, 2016. "Optimizing strategy for Escherichia coli growth and hydrogen production during glycerol fermentation in batch culture: Effects of some heavy metal ions and their mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 335-340.
    19. Palomo-Briones, Rodolfo & Razo-Flores, Elías & Bernet, Nicolas & Trably, Eric, 2017. "Dark-fermentative biohydrogen pathways and microbial networks in continuous stirred tank reactors: Novel insights on their control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 77-87.
    20. Anita Šalić & Bruno Zelić, 2022. "A Game Changer: Microfluidic Technology for Enhancing Biohydrogen Production—Small Size for Great Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:141:y:2017:i:c:p:358-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.