IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v123y2017icp742-753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of kinematic wind turbine wake models in complex terrain using actual windfarm production data

Author

Listed:
  • Seim, Fredrik
  • Gravdahl, Arne R.
  • Adaramola, Muyiwa S.

Abstract

Measurements from a wind farm in northern Norway have been used in an attempt to validate three kinematic wake models, which are often preferred due to their efficiency in terms of calculation time. Assisted by the commercial CFD-based WindSim software, the accuracy of the Jensen-, Larsen- and Ishihara model are tested in eight single-wake cases with regard to several key aspects. Due to the complex terrain at the site, a range of issues complicated the validation procedure. The Larsen model correlated well with the measured data regarding the normalized power deficit, while both the Jensen- and Ishihara model clearly overestimated the power deficit. At the wake centerline, the Larsen model was by far the most accurate, with a mean absolute error of 7%. The Jensen- and Ishihara model had a mean absolute error of 21% and 34% respectively. Both the Jensen- and Ishihara model agreed well with the observed wake width. The Larsen model widely overestimated the wake width in all cases, but with an almost constant offset. For the energy loss in the wake, the Larsen model performed best for the three investigated wake cases with a mean absolute error of 29%, although all the three wake models showed a varying performance with a tendency to underestimate the energy loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Seim, Fredrik & Gravdahl, Arne R. & Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2017. "Validation of kinematic wind turbine wake models in complex terrain using actual windfarm production data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 742-753.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:123:y:2017:i:c:p:742-753
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217301470
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adaramola, M.S. & Krogstad, P.-Å., 2011. "Experimental investigation of wake effects on wind turbine performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2078-2086.
    2. Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2012. "Estimating global solar radiation using common meteorological data in Akure, Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 38-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonini, Enrico G.A. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2020. "Optimal design of wind farms in complex terrains using computational fluid dynamics and adjoint methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    2. Yuan Li & Zengjin Xu & Zuoxia Xing & Bowen Zhou & Haoqian Cui & Bowen Liu & Bo Hu, 2020. "A Modified Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes-Based Wind Turbine Wake Model Considering Correction Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Liang, Xiaoling & Fu, Shifeng & Cai, Fulin & Han, Xingxing & Zhu, Weijun & Yang, Hua & Shen, Wenzhong, 2023. "Experimental investigation on wake characteristics of wind turbine and a new two-dimensional wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 373-381.
    4. Famoso, Fabio & Brusca, Sebastian & D'Urso, Diego & Galvagno, Antonio & Chiacchio, Ferdinando, 2020. "A novel hybrid model for the estimation of energy conversion in a wind farm combining wake effects and stochastic dependability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Syed Ahmed Kabir, Ijaz Fazil & Safiyullah, Ferozkhan & Ng, E.Y.K. & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2020. "New analytical wake models based on artificial intelligence and rivalling the benchmark full-rotor CFD predictions under both uniform and ABL inflows," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Dai, Juchuan & Yang, Xin & Hu, Wei & Wen, Li & Tan, Yayi, 2018. "Effect investigation of yaw on wind turbine performance based on SCADA data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 684-696.
    7. Pacheco de Sá Sarmiento, Franciene Izis & Goes Oliveira, Jorge Luiz & Passos, Júlio César, 2022. "Impact of atmospheric stability, wake effect and topography on power production at complex-terrain wind farm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    8. Daniel Tabas & Jiannong Fang & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2019. "Wind Energy Prediction in Highly Complex Terrain by Computational Fluid Dynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Sun, Haiying & Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "A review of full-scale wind-field measurements of the wind-turbine wake effect and a measurement of the wake-interaction effect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing & Gao, Xiaoxia, 2023. "Investigation into wind turbine wake effect on complex terrain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mecibah, Mohamed Salah & Boukelia, Taqiy Eddine & Tahtah, Reda & Gairaa, Kacem, 2014. "Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (Case study: Algeria)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 194-202.
    2. Ma, Hongliang & Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Guangxing & Du, Bowen & Liu, Yongqian, 2021. "Formulas of the optimized yaw angles for cooperative control of wind farms with aligned turbines to maximize the power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    3. Rubel C. Das & Yu-Lin Shen, 2023. "Analysis of Wind Farms under Different Yaw Angles and Wind Speeds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Ghasemi Mobtaker, Hassan & Ajabshirchi, Yahya & Ranjbar, Seyed Faramarz & Matloobi, Mansour, 2016. "Solar energy conservation in greenhouse: Thermal analysis and experimental validation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 509-519.
    5. Giwa, Adewale & Alabi, Adetunji & Yusuf, Ahmed & Olukan, Tuza, 2017. "A comprehensive review on biomass and solar energy for sustainable energy generation in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 620-641.
    6. Dou, Bingzheng & Guala, Michele & Lei, Liping & Zeng, Pan, 2019. "Experimental investigation of the performance and wake effect of a small-scale wind turbine in a wind tunnel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 819-833.
    7. Hayat, Imran & Chatterjee, Tanmoy & Liu, Huiwen & Peet, Yulia T. & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2019. "Exploring wind farms with alternating two- and three-bladed wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 764-774.
    8. Li, Qing'an & Cai, Chang & Kamada, Yasunari & Maeda, Takao & Hiromori, Yuto & Zhou, Shuni & Xu, Jianzhong, 2021. "Prediction of power generation of two 30 kW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines with Gaussian model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Martin Robinius & Alexander Otto & Konstantinos Syranidis & David S. Ryberg & Philipp Heuser & Lara Welder & Thomas Grube & Peter Markewitz & Vanessa Tietze & Detlef Stolten, 2017. "Linking the Power and Transport Sectors—Part 2: Modelling a Sector Coupling Scenario for Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Khadijah Barashid & Amr Munshi & Ahmad Alhindi, 2023. "Wind Farm Power Prediction Considering Layout and Wake Effect: Case Study of Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Yao, Wanxiang & Zhang, Chunxiao & Hao, Haodong & Wang, Xiao & Li, Xianli, 2018. "A support vector machine approach to estimate global solar radiation with the influence of fog and haze," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 155-162.
    12. Guillem Armengol Barcos & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2023. "Enhancing Wind Farm Performance through Axial Induction and Tilt Control: Insights from Wind Tunnel Experiments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Deepu Dilip & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2017. "Wind Turbine Wake Mitigation through Blade Pitch Offset," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Francesco Mazzeo & Derek Micheletto & Alessandro Talamelli & Antonio Segalini, 2022. "An Experimental Study on a Wind Turbine Rotor Affected by Pitch Imbalance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Ciprian Sorandaru & Sorin Musuroi & Flaviu Mihai Frigura-Iliasa & Doru Vatau & Marian Dordescu, 2019. "Analysis of the Wind System Operation in the Optimal Energetic Area at Variable Wind Speed over Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Modali, Pranav K. & Vinod, Ashwin & Banerjee, Arindam, 2021. "Towards a better understanding of yawed turbine wake for efficient wake steering in tidal arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 482-494.
    17. Han, Chenlu & Nagamune, Ryozo, 2020. "Platform position control of floating wind turbines using aerodynamic force," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 896-907.
    18. Li, Qing'an & Maeda, Takao & Kamada, Yasunari & Hiromori, Yuto, 2018. "Investigation of wake characteristic of a 30 kW rated power Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine with wake model and field measurement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1190-1204.
    19. Wei Yang & Meng Yu & Bowen Yan & Guoqing Huang & Qingshan Yang & Senqin Zhang & Tianhao Hong & Xu Zhou & Xiaowei Deng, 2022. "Wind Tunnel Tests of Wake Characteristics for a Scaled Wind Turbine Model Based on Dynamic Similarity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Bayrakçı, Hilmi Cenk & Demircan, Cihan & Keçebaş, Ali, 2018. "The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2771-2782.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:123:y:2017:i:c:p:742-753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.