IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v39y2011i10p5939-5949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High penetration wind generation impacts on spot prices in the Australian national electricity market

Author

Listed:
  • Cutler, Nicholas J.
  • Boerema, Nicholas D.
  • MacGill, Iain F.
  • Outhred, Hugh R.

Abstract

This paper explores wind power integration issues for the South Australian (SA) region of the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM) by assessing the interaction of regional wind generation, electricity demand and spot prices over 2 recent years of market operation. SA's wind energy penetration has recently surpassed 20% and it has only a limited interconnection with other regions of the NEM. As such, it represents an interesting example of high wind penetration in a gross wholesale pool market electricity industry. Our findings suggest that while electricity demand continues to have the greatest influence on spot prices in SA, wind generation levels have become a significant secondary influence, and there is an inverse relationship between wind generation and price. No clear relationship between wind generation and demand has been identified although some periods of extremely high demand may coincide with lower wind generation. Periods of high wind output are associated with generally lower market prices, and also appear to contribute to extreme negative price events. The results highlight the importance of electricity market and renewable policy design in facilitating economically efficient high wind penetrations.

Suggested Citation

  • Cutler, Nicholas J. & Boerema, Nicholas D. & MacGill, Iain F. & Outhred, Hugh R., 2011. "High penetration wind generation impacts on spot prices in the Australian national electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 5939-5949, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:39:y:2011:i:10:p:5939-5949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151100509X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Cutler & Hugh Outhred & Iain MacGill, 2009. "The Integration of Wind Generation within the South Australian Region of the Australia National Electricity Market," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 0938, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    2. Klessmann, Corinna & Nabe, Christian & Burges, Karsten, 2008. "Pros and cons of exposing renewables to electricity market risks--A comparison of the market integration approaches in Germany, Spain, and the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3646-3661, October.
    3. Nicholas Boerema & Merlinde Kay & Iain MacGill, 2010. "Renewable energy integration into the Australian National Electricity Market: Characterising the energy value of wind and solar generation," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 1088, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    4. MacGill, Iain, 2010. "Electricity market design for facilitating the integration of wind energy: Experience and prospects with the Australian National Electricity Market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3180-3191, July.
    5. Cutler, Nicholas & MacGill, Iain & Outhred, Hugh, 2009. "The Integration of Wind Generation within the South Australian Region of the Australia National Electricity Market," Research Reports 94887, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
    6. Holttinen, H., 2005. "Optimal electricity market for wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2052-2063, November.
    7. Boerema, Nicholas & Kay, Merlinde & MacGill, Iain, 2010. "Renewable energy integration into the Australian National Electricity Market: Characterising the energy value of wind and solar generation," Research Reports 107740, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McConnell, Dylan & Hearps, Patrick & Eales, Dominic & Sandiford, Mike & Dunn, Rebecca & Wright, Matthew & Bateman, Lachlan, 2013. "Retrospective modeling of the merit-order effect on wholesale electricity prices from distributed photovoltaic generation in the Australian National Electricity Market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 17-27.
    2. Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & MacGill, Iain F., 2013. "Assessing the value of wind generation in future carbon constrained electricity industries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 400-412.
    3. Scharff, Richard & Amelin, Mikael & Söder, Lennart, 2013. "Approaching wind power forecast deviations with internal ex-ante self-balancing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 106-115.
    4. Nicholas Boerema & Iain MacGill, 2010. "The economics of transmission constraints on wind farms: some evidence from South Australia," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 1089, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    5. Bueno-Lorenzo, Miriam & Moreno, M. Ángeles & Usaola, Julio, 2013. "Analysis of the imbalance price scheme in the Spanish electricity market: A wind power test case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1010-1019.
    6. Moradi-Dalvand, M. & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. & Amjady, N. & Zareipour, H. & Mazhab-Jafari, A., 2015. "Self-scheduling of a wind producer based on Information Gap Decision Theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 588-600.
    7. Fridgen, Gilbert & Michaelis, Anne & Rinck, Maximilian & Schöpf, Michael & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2020. "The search for the perfect match: Aligning power-trading products to the energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Nicholas Boerema & Merlinde Kay & Iain MacGill, 2010. "Renewable energy integration into the Australian National Electricity Market: Characterising the energy value of wind and solar generation," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 1088, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    9. Genoese, Massimo & Slednev, Viktor & Fichtner, Wolf, 2016. "Analysis of drivers affecting the use of market premium for renewables in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 494-506.
    10. Chinmoy, Lakshmi & Iniyan, S. & Goic, Ranko, 2019. "Modeling wind power investments, policies and social benefits for deregulated electricity market – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 364-377.
    11. Pandžić, Hrvoje & Kuzle, Igor & Capuder, Tomislav, 2013. "Virtual power plant mid-term dispatch optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 134-141.
    12. Shahmohammadi, Ali & Sioshansi, Ramteen & Conejo, Antonio J. & Afsharnia, Saeed, 2018. "Market equilibria and interactions between strategic generation, wind, and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 876-892.
    13. Paul Koutstaal & Michiel Bijlsma & Gijsbert Zwart & X. van Tilburg, 2009. "Market performance and distributional effects on renewable energy markets," CPB Document 190.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    14. Simshauser, P., 2019. "On the impact of government-initiated CfD’s in Australia’s National Electricity Market," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1901, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    15. Jun Maekawa & Koji Shimada, 2019. "A Speculative Trading Model for the Electricity Market: Based on Japan Electric Power Exchange," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Hiroux, C. & Saguan, M., 2010. "Large-scale wind power in European electricity markets: Time for revisiting support schemes and market designs?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3135-3145, July.
    17. Jean-Luc Gaffard & Mauro Napoletano, 2012. "Agent-based models and economic policy," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/53r60a8s3ku, Sciences Po.
    18. Goodarzi, Shadi & Perera, H. Niles & Bunn, Derek, 2019. "The impact of renewable energy forecast errors on imbalance volumes and electricity spot prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Würzburg, Klaas & Labandeira, Xavier & Linares, Pedro, 2013. "Renewable generation and electricity prices: Taking stock and new evidence for Germany and Austria," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(S1), pages 159-171.
    20. Moreno, Blanca & López, Ana J. & García-Álvarez, María Teresa, 2012. "The electricity prices in the European Union. The role of renewable energies and regulatory electric market reforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 307-313.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:39:y:2011:i:10:p:5939-5949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.