IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v210y2026ics0301421525005403.html

Heterogeneity in policy preferences for energy renovation: Evidence from a mixed-effects ordinal model

Author

Listed:
  • Beringhs, Antonin
  • Wagner, Joël
  • Wanzenried, Gabrielle

Abstract

Energy renovations are a key pillar for reducing CO2 emissions and lowering energy demand in the residential sector. This work makes a central contribution by linking the determinants of renovation decisions among owner-occupiers with the impact they assign to a wide range of existing and prospective policy instruments, thereby providing robust empirical evidence for guiding the evolution of the energy renovation policy mix. The analyses rely on data from a custom-designed survey administered in 2024 to 1 400 Swiss owner-occupiers. We employ a two-step methodology, combining a descriptive analysis of the determinants and the importance assigned to the instruments with the estimation of cumulative link mixed models (CLMMs) that characterise the heterogeneity factors shaping the importance assigned to prospective instruments. The descriptive analyses show that technical and financial considerations primarily drive renovation decisions, while the procedural complexity is a major barrier. Financial instruments clearly dominate renovation incentives, with information, cooperative or regulatory measures perceived as weak motivators. Homeowners also express strong support for strengthening existing financial instruments and introducing risk-management tools, while new regulatory measures garner little support. The importance assigned to these instruments is influenced by behavioural traits and varies systematically with socio-demographic and technical characteristics. Although based on Swiss data, the similarity of building stock characteristics across Europe and the standard typology of the policy instruments examined make these conclusions relevant beyond the Swiss context.

Suggested Citation

  • Beringhs, Antonin & Wagner, Joël & Wanzenried, Gabrielle, 2026. "Heterogeneity in policy preferences for energy renovation: Evidence from a mixed-effects ordinal model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0301421525005403
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.115033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525005403
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.115033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Galimshina & Maliki Moustapha & Alexander Hollberg & Sébastien Lasvaux & Bruno Sudret & Guillaume Habert, 2024. "Strategies for robust renovation of residential buildings in Switzerland," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Evan Mills, 2007. "Synergisms between climate change mitigation and adaptation: an insurance perspective," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 809-842, June.
    3. Baltuttis, Dennik & Töppel, Jannick & Tränkler, Timm & Wiethe, Christian, 2020. "Managing the risks of energy efficiency insurances in a portfolio context: An actuarial diversification approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Novikova, Aleksandra & Amecke, Hermann & Neuhoff, Karsten & Stelmakh, Kateryna & Kiss, Bernadett & Rohde, Clemens & Dunkelberg, Elisa & Weiß, Julia & Matschoss, Kaisa & Darby, Sarah, 2011. "Information tools for energy demand reduction in existing residential buildings," EconStor Research Reports 65873, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    5. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    6. Paolo Bertoldi & Marina Economidou & Valentina Palermo & Benigna Boza‐Kiss & Valeria Todeschi, 2021. "How to finance energy renovation of residential buildings: Review of current and emerging financing instruments in the EU," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), January.
    7. Schleich, Joachim & Gassmann, Xavier & Meissner, Thomas & Faure, Corinne, 2019. "A large-scale test of the effects of time discounting, risk aversion, loss aversion, and present bias on household adoption of energy-efficient technologies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 377-393.
    8. Akhatova, A. & Derkenbaeva, E. & van Leeuwen, E. & Kranzl, L. & Halleck Vega, S. & Hofstede, G.J., 2024. "Who invests in energy retrofits? Mining Dutch homeowners’ data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Rogge, Karoline S. & Reichardt, Kristin, 2016. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1620-1635.
    10. Mills, Evan, 2003. "Risk transfer via energy-savings insurance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 273-281, February.
    11. Massimo Filippini & Nilkanth Kumar, 2024. "Determinants to the adoption of energy-efficient retrofits and the role of policy measures," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(10), pages 885-892, June.
    12. Hondeborg, Dianne & Probst, Benedict & Petkov, Ivalin & Knoeri, Christof, 2023. "The effectiveness of building retrofits under a subsidy scheme: Empirical evidence from Switzerland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Tobias Wekhof & Sébastien Houde, 2023. "Using narratives to infer preferences in understanding the energy efficiency gap," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(9), pages 965-977, September.
    14. Ebrahimigharehbaghi, Shima & Qian, Queena K. & Meijer, Frits M. & Visscher, Henk J., 2019. "Unravelling Dutch homeowners' behaviour towards energy efficiency renovations: What drives and hinders their decision-making?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 546-561.
    15. Häckel, Björn & Pfosser, Stefan & Tränkler, Timm, 2017. "Explaining the energy efficiency gap - Expected Utility Theory versus Cumulative Prospect Theory," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 414-426.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Töppel, Jannick & Tränkler, Timm, 2019. "Modeling energy efficiency insurances and energy performance contracts for a quantitative comparison of risk mitigation potential," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 842-859.
    2. Wiethe, Christian & Wenninger, Simon, 2023. "The influence of building energy performance prediction accuracy on retrofit rates," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Rockstuhl, Sebastian & Wenninger, Simon & Wiethe, Christian & Ahlrichs, Jakob, 2022. "The influence of risk perception on energy efficiency investments: Evidence from a German survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Marko Å ostar & Ines Å koko, 2024. "Unpacking the Complexities of Energy Renovation Programs for Family Houses: Case Study of Croatia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 12-25, July.
    5. Rockstuhl, Sebastian & Wenninger, Simon & Wiethe, Christian & Häckel, Björn, 2021. "Understanding the risk perception of energy efficiency investments: Investment perspective vs. energy bill perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Belaïd, Fateh & Flambard, Véronique, 2024. "Ecological-behavioral economics: Impact of information on energy-renovation decision through third-party investing," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Ahlrichs, Jakob & Rockstuhl, Sebastian & Tränkler, Timm & Wenninger, Simon, 2020. "The impact of political instruments on building energy retrofits: A risk-integrated thermal Energy Hub approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Baltuttis, Dennik & Töppel, Jannick & Tränkler, Timm & Wiethe, Christian, 2020. "Managing the risks of energy efficiency insurances in a portfolio context: An actuarial diversification approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Hwang, In Chang & Yi, Yoonhye & Lee, Hyun-jung & Baek, Jong-rak, 2025. "Implementing Seoul's greenhouse gas management in buildings: Insights from the SICE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Maia, Iná E.N. & Harringer, Daniel & Kranzl, Lukas, 2024. "Household budget restrictions as reason for staged retrofits: A case study in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Negrini, Marcello & Riedl, Arno & Wibral, Matthias, 2022. "Sunk cost in investment decisions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1105-1135.
    12. Jadidi, Hossein & MacDonald, Adriane & Soliz, Aryana & Eicker, Ursula, 2026. "Assessing the effectiveness of municipal climate actions: A scoring system for residential energy retrofit initiatives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    13. Cheng, Minghui & Frangopol, Dan M., 2022. "Life-cycle optimization of structural systems based on cumulative prospect theory: Effects of the reference point and risk attitudes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    14. Hondeborg, Dianne & Probst, Benedict & Petkov, Ivalin & Knoeri, Christof, 2023. "The effectiveness of building retrofits under a subsidy scheme: Empirical evidence from Switzerland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Peñasco, Cristina, 2024. "From policy to practice: The role of national policy instruments and social barriers in UK energy efficiency adoption in households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    16. Gabriela Barbosa & Manuela Almeida, 2025. "Strategies for Implementing and Scaling Renovation Passports: A Systematic Review of EU Energy Renovation Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Luc Meunier & Sima Ohadi, 2023. "When are two portfolios better than one? A prospect theory approach," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 503-538, April.
    18. Liu, Guo & Li, Xiaohu & Tan, Yongtao & Zhang, Guomin, 2020. "Building green retrofit in China: Policies, barriers and recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Marmolejo-Duarte, Carlos & Fullaondo-Elordui-Zapaterietxe, Arkaitz & Encinas-Pino, Felipe & Aguirre-Núñez, Carlos & Espinoza-Zambrano, Paúl, 2026. "Households’ perceptions of the efficacy of retrofit policies to boost efficient homes in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. Serge Nyawa & Christian Gnekpe & Dieudonné Tchuente, 2025. "Transparent machine learning models for predicting decisions to undertake energy retrofits in residential buildings," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 354(1), pages 459-487, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0301421525005403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.