IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v202y2025ics0301421525001120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Support mechanisms for low-carbon hydrogen: The risks of segmenting a commodity market

Author

Listed:
  • Mastropietro, Paolo
  • Rodilla, Pablo

Abstract

Although the actual scope of the hydrogen sector is subject to great uncertainty, a global wave of support mechanisms for low-carbon hydrogen is being registered. In many cases, these schemes aim to bridge the gap between the current cost of producing clean hydrogen and the price that existing and potential end users are willing to pay for it. In doing so, they tend to introduce a regulatory segmentation into the hydrogen market, preventing supported hydrogen from being supplied to certain end uses, or providing support to production/end use pairs. This approach would require a burdensome monitoring, which is prone to fraud, and could lead to inefficient outcomes from a system-wide perspective. In contrast to these approaches, we argue for centralised hydrogen support mechanisms that bring together producers and end users in the same bidding process. This approach, whose high-level design is discussed in the article, would allow the most competitive production projects to be selected and this initial low-carbon hydrogen generation to be secured by those end uses that are willing to pay the highest price for it and could therefore be more efficiently decarbonised with hydrogen.

Suggested Citation

  • Mastropietro, Paolo & Rodilla, Pablo, 2025. "Support mechanisms for low-carbon hydrogen: The risks of segmenting a commodity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001120
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.