IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v302y2022i3p1079-1096.html

A dynamic “predict, then optimize” preventive maintenance approach using operational intervention data

Author

Listed:
  • van Staden, Heletjé E.
  • Deprez, Laurens
  • Boute, Robert N.

Abstract

We investigate whether historical machine failures and maintenance records may be used to derive future machine failure estimates and, in turn, prescribe advancements of scheduled preventive maintenance interventions. We model the problem using a sequential predict, then optimize approach. In our prescriptive optimization model, we use a finite horizon Markov decision process with a variable order Markov chain, in which the chain length varies depending on the time since the last preventive maintenance action was performed. The model therefore captures the dependency of a machine’s failures on both recent failures as well as preventive maintenance actions, via our prediction model. We validate our model using an original equipment manufacturer data set and obtain policies that prescribe when to deviate from the planned periodic maintenance schedule. To improve our predictions for machine failure behavior with limited to no past data, we pool our data set over different machine classes by means of a Poisson generalized linear model. We find that our policies can supplement and improve on those currently applied by 5%, on average.

Suggested Citation

  • van Staden, Heletjé E. & Deprez, Laurens & Boute, Robert N., 2022. "A dynamic “predict, then optimize” preventive maintenance approach using operational intervention data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1079-1096.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:302:y:2022:i:3:p:1079-1096
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722000765
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Sgarbossa & Ilenia Zennaro & Eleonora Florian & Martina Calzavara, 2020. "Age replacement policy in the case of no data: the effect of Weibull parameter estimation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(19), pages 5851-5869, October.
    2. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    3. Velibor V. Miv{s}i'c & Georgia Perakis, 2019. "Data Analytics in Operations Management: A Review," Papers 1905.00556, arXiv.org.
    4. Michael Jong Kim & Viliam Makis, 2013. "Joint Optimization of Sampling and Control of Partially Observable Failing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 777-790, June.
    5. Poppe, Joeri & Boute, Robert N. & Lambrecht, Marc R., 2018. "A hybrid condition-based maintenance policy for continuously monitored components with two degradation thresholds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 515-532.
    6. C. Drent & S. Kapodistria & J. A. C. Resing, 2019. "Condition-based maintenance policies under imperfect maintenance at scheduled and unscheduled opportunities," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 269-308, December.
    7. Lopez, Olivier, 2019. "A censored copula model for micro-level claim reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-14.
    8. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    9. Richard Barlow & Larry Hunter, 1960. "Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 90-100, February.
    10. van Staden, Heletjé E. & Boute, Robert N., 2021. "The effect of multi-sensor data on condition-based maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 585-600.
    11. Regattieri, A. & Manzini, R. & Battini, D., 2010. "Estimating reliability characteristics in the presence of censored data: A case study in a light commercial vehicle manufacturing system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1093-1102.
    12. van Oosterom, C.D. & Elwany, A.H. & Çelebi, D. & van Houtum, G.J., 2014. "Optimal policies for a delay time model with postponed replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 186-197.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Mixin & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2024. "Maintenance modeling of serial-parallel multi-station manufacturing system with failure-induced damage and assembly parts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Wu, Shaomin & Asadi, Majid, 2024. "A preventive maintenance policy and a method to approximate the failure process for multi-component systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 825-835.
    3. Dwight, Richard & Li, Wenxu & van Rooij, Frits & Scarf, Phil, 2026. "Maintenance planning using a digital twin: principles and case studies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
    4. Zheng, Meimei & Lin, Jie & Xia, Tangbin & Liu, Yu & Pan, Ershun, 2023. "Joint condition-based maintenance and spare provisioning policy for a K-out-of-N system with failures during inspection intervals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1220-1232.
    5. Sachini Weerasekara & Zhenyuan Lu & Burcu Ozek & Jacqueline Isaacs & Sagar Kamarthi, 2022. "Trends in Adopting Industry 4.0 for Asset Life Cycle Management for Sustainability: A Keyword Co-Occurrence Network Review and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Dursun, İpek & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2022. "Data pooling for multiple single-component systems under population heterogeneity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arts, Joachim & Boute, Robert N. & Loeys, Stijn & van Staden, Heletjé E., 2025. "Fifty years of maintenance optimization: Reflections and perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(3), pages 725-739.
    2. Eggertsson, Ragnar & Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Basten, Rob & Maillart, Lisa M., 2025. "Maintenance optimization for multi-component systems with a single sensor," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 559-569.
    3. Kampitsis, Dimitris & Panagiotidou, Sofia, 2022. "A Bayesian condition-based maintenance and monitoring policy with variable sampling intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    4. Akcay, Alp, 2022. "An alert-assisted inspection policy for a production process with imperfect condition signals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 510-525.
    5. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Collin Drent & Melvin Drent & Joachim Arts & Stella Kapodistria, 2023. "Real-Time Integrated Learning and Decision Making for Cumulative Shock Degradation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 235-253, January.
    7. Collin Drent & Melvin Drent & Joachim Arts, 2024. "Condition-Based Production for Stochastically Deteriorating Systems: Optimal Policies and Learning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 1137-1156, May.
    8. van Staden, Heletjé E. & Boute, Robert N., 2021. "The effect of multi-sensor data on condition-based maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 585-600.
    9. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2021. "Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 530-545.
    10. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    11. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2025. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 179-207, March.
    12. Fiona Sloothaak & Alp Akçay & Geert-Jan van Houtum & Matthieu van der Heijden, 2023. "After-Sales Services During an Asset’s Lifetime: Collaborative Planning of System Upgrades," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 212-232, September.
    13. Kivanç, İpek & Fecarotti, Claudia & Raassens, Néomie & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2024. "A scalable multi-objective maintenance optimization model for systems with multiple heterogeneous components and a finite lifespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 567-579.
    14. Hu, Jiawen & Sun, Qiuzhuang, 2026. "A dynamic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to degradation and periodic shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 266(PB).
    15. Ma, Xiaobing & Han, Ruoran & Chen, Yi & Qiu, Qingan & Yan, Rui & Yang, Li, 2024. "Intelligent spare ordering and replacement optimisation leveraging adaptive prediction information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    16. Kıvanç, İpek & Fecarotti, Claudia & Raassens, Néomie & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2025. "Condition-based maintenance for multi-component systems: A scalable optimization model with two thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    17. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    18. da Costa, Paulo & Verleijsdonk, Peter & Voorberg, Simon & Akcay, Alp & Kapodistria, Stella & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Zhang, Yingqian, 2023. "Policies for the dynamic traveling maintainer problem with alerts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1141-1152.
    19. Lucía Bautista & Inma T Castro & Luis Landesa, 2022. "Maintenance cost assessment for heterogeneous multi-component systems incorporating perfect inspections and waiting time to maintenance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(5), pages 797-815, October.
    20. Castro, Inma T. & Basten, Rob J.I. & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2020. "Maintenance cost evaluation for heterogeneous complex systems under continuous monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:302:y:2022:i:3:p:1079-1096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.