Estimation of the number of failures in the Weibull model using the ordinary differential equation
In estimating the number of failures using right truncated grouped data, we often encounter cases that the estimate is smaller than the true one when we use the likelihood principle to conditional probability. In infectious disease spread predictions, the SIR model described by simultaneous ordinary differential equations is commonly used, and it can predict reasonably well the number of infected patients even when the size of observed data is small. We have investigated whether the ordinary differential equation model can estimate the number of failures more accurately than does the likelihood principle under the condition of right truncated grouped data. The positive results are obtained in the Weibull model, similarly to the cases of the SARS, A(H1N1), and FMD.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Ghitany, M. E. & Maller, R. A. & Zhou, S., 1994. "Exponential Mixture Models with Long-Term Survivors and Covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 218-241, May.
- Pham, Hoang & Zhang, Xuemei, 2003. "NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 443-454, March.
- Hirose, Hideo, 2007. "The mixed trunsored model with applications to SARS," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 74(6), pages 443-453.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:223:y:2012:i:3:p:722-731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.