IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v197y2009i2p675-684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Satisfying optimization method based on goal programming for fuzzy multiple objective optimization problem

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Shaoyuan
  • Hu, Chaofang

Abstract

This paper proposes a satisfying optimization method based on goal programming for fuzzy multiple objective optimization problem. The aim of this presented approach is to make the more important objective achieving the higher desirable satisfying degree. For different fuzzy relations and fuzzy importance, the reformulated optimization models based on goal programming is proposed. Not only the satisfying results of all the objectives can be acquired, but also the fuzzy importance requirement can be simultaneously actualized. The balance between optimization and relative importance is realized. We demonstrate the efficiency, flexibility and sensitivity of the proposed method by numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Shaoyuan & Hu, Chaofang, 2009. "Satisfying optimization method based on goal programming for fuzzy multiple objective optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 675-684, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:197:y:2009:i:2:p:675-684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(08)00511-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Akoz, Onur & Petrovic, Dobrila, 2007. "A fuzzy goal programming method with imprecise goal hierarchy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1427-1433, September.
    3. Chaofang Hu & Shaoyuan Li, 2006. "Enhanced Interactive Satisfying Optimization Approach To Multiple Objective Optimization With Preemptive Priorities," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(01), pages 47-63.
    4. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Tsai, Feng-Chou, 2001. "Fuzzy goal programming with different importance and priorities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(3), pages 548-556, September.
    5. Pal, Bijay Baran & Nath Moitra, Bhola, 2003. "A goal programming procedure for solving problems with multiple fuzzy goals using dynamic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 480-491, February.
    6. Yang, Jian-Bo & Sen, Pratyush, 1996. "Preference modelling by estimating local utility functions for multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 115-138, November.
    7. Yang, Jian-Bo, 2000. "Minimax reference point approach and its application for multiobjective optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 541-556, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    2. Liu, Xiao & Li, Mo & Guo, Ping & Zhang, Zhongxue, 2019. "Optimization of water and fertilizer coupling system based on rice grain quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 34-46.
    3. Firoz Ahmad, 2022. "Interactive neutrosophic optimization technique for multiobjective programming problems: an application to pharmaceutical supply chain management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 551-585, April.
    4. Hung-Wen Cheng, 2013. "A satisficing method for fuzzy goal programming problems with different importance and priorities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 485-498, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lotfi, M.M. & Torabi, S.A., 2011. "A fuzzy goal programming approach for mid-term assortment planning in supermarkets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 430-441, September.
    2. Hocine, Amin & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Li, Der-Chiang, 2020. "Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 642-654.
    3. Nurullah Umarusman, 2018. "Fuzzy Goal Programming Problem Based on Minmax Approach for Optimal System Design," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 6(1), pages 177-192, June.
    4. Hung-Wen Cheng, 2013. "A satisficing method for fuzzy goal programming problems with different importance and priorities," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 485-498, January.
    5. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    6. Wee, Hui-Ming & Lo, Chien-Chung & Hsu, Ping-Hui, 2009. "A multi-objective joint replenishment inventory model of deteriorated items in a fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 620-631, September.
    7. Liang-chuan Wu & I-chan Tsai, 2014. "Three fuzzy goal programming models for index portfolios," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(8), pages 1155-1169, August.
    8. Kongar, Elif & Gupta, Surendra M., 2006. "Disassembly to order system under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 550-561, December.
    9. Aouni, Belaid & Colapinto, Cinzia & La Torre, Davide, 2014. "Financial portfolio management through the goal programming model: Current state-of-the-art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 536-545.
    10. Houshang Taghizadeh & Ardeshir Bazrkar & Mohammad Abedzadeh, 2015. "Optimization Production Planning Using Fuzzy Goal Programming Techniques," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(9), pages 1-68, September.
    11. Arora, S.R. & Gupta, Ritu, 2009. "Interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for bilevel programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 368-376, April.
    12. Akoz, Onur & Petrovic, Dobrila, 2007. "A fuzzy goal programming method with imprecise goal hierarchy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1427-1433, September.
    13. Hu, Chao-Fang & Teng, Chang-Jun & Li, Shao-Yuan, 2007. "A fuzzy goal programming approach to multi-objective optimization problem with priorities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1319-1333, February.
    14. Yaghoobi, M.A. & Tamiz, M., 2007. "A method for solving fuzzy goal programming problems based on MINMAX approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1580-1590, March.
    15. Guo, Peijun & Li, Yonggang, 2014. "Approaches to multistage one-shot decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 612-623.
    16. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    17. Jinyi Hu, 2023. "Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    19. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    20. de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge, 2007. "Claim reserving with fuzzy regression and Taylor's geometric separation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 145-163, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:197:y:2009:i:2:p:675-684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.