IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v503y2025ics0304380025000432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling system dynamics as a socio-ecological perspective to support human-beaver interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Treves, Anna
  • Zenezini, Giovanni
  • Comino, Elena

Abstract

Beavers are semi-aquatic mammals that significantly impact on freshwater ecosystems, creating benefits and challenges, particularly in areas with close human interaction. Managing human-beaver interactions is a multifaceted issue due to the many variables involved, but the complexity of these interactions can be analysed effectively using system dynamics models. These models are used in many contexts, including wildlife management, to simulate a variety of management policies and assess their effects. The present study addressed gaps in the literature by developing a system dynamics model that examined both the benefits and conflicts that arise from human-beaver interactions. The model, implemented using Vensim PLE software, synthesised qualitative and quantitative data to simulate four simulation scenarios: ecological, social, economic, and policy making. The study examined the dynamics of beaver populations, ecosystem service provision, social perceptions, and management strategies in a case study of the Ivrea lakes area in the Piedmont region (Italy). Model predictions highlights that beaver populations stabilized logistically, influencing ecosystem services and residual capital, while social acceptance stongly reduced management costs and social pressure. Optimal budget allocation and combined strategies emerged as key to sustainable management and conflict mitigation. Overall, predictions suggest that an integrated approach that prioritises prevention and actively engages local communities can improve both ecological outcomes and social acceptance of beavers. The model is a useful decision and discussion tool for assessing management strategies and facilitating stakeholder involvement. Future studies should expand on these results by exploring additional beaver-related conflicts and benefits in diverse contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Treves, Anna & Zenezini, Giovanni & Comino, Elena, 2025. "Modelling system dynamics as a socio-ecological perspective to support human-beaver interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 503(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:503:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025000432
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025000432
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lopes, Rita & Videira, Nuno, 2017. "Modelling feedback processes underpinning management of ecosystem services: The role of participatory systems mapping," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 28-42.
    2. Roger Edward Auster & Stewart Barr & Richard Brazier, 2021. "Alternative perspectives of the angling community on Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) reintroduction in the River Otter Beaver Trial," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(7), pages 1252-1270, June.
    3. Weller, Florian & Sherley, Richard B. & Waller, Lauren J. & Ludynia, Katrin & Geldenhuys, Deon & Shannon, Lynne J. & Jarre, Astrid, 2016. "System dynamics modelling of the Endangered African penguin populations on Dyer and Robben islands, South Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 327(C), pages 44-56.
    4. Turner, Benjamin L., 2020. "Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    5. Illisriyani Ismail & Pierre Failler & Antaya March & Andy Thorpe, 2022. "A System Dynamics Approach for Improved Management of the Indian Mackerel Fishery in Peninsular Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Bald, J. & Sinquin, A. & Borja, A. & Caill-Milly, N. & Duclercq, B. & Dang, C. & de Montaudouin, X., 2009. "A system dynamics model for the management of the Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum (Adams and Reeve, 1850) in the Bay of Arcachon (France)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 2828-2837.
    7. Mohammad Reza Davahli & Waldemar Karwowski & Redha Taiar, 2020. "A System Dynamics Simulation Applied to Healthcare: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Homer, J.B. & Hirsch, G.B., 2006. "System dynamics modeling for public health: Background and opportunities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 452-458.
    9. Beall, Allyson & Zeoli, Len, 2008. "Participatory modeling of endangered wildlife systems: Simulating the sage-grouse and land use in Central Washington," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 24-33, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiapeng Qu & Zelin Liu & Zhenggang Guo & Yikang Li & Huakun Zhou, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Assessing the Efficacy of Lethal Control for Sustainable Management of Ochotona curzoniae on Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Daniel Rojas-Díaz & María Eugenia Puerta-Yepes & Daniel Medina-Gaspar & Jesús Alonso Botero & Anwar Rodríguez & Norberto Rojas, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling for the Assessment of Public Policies in the Cancer Health-Care System Implemented for the Colombian Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-36, September.
    3. Priyanka Das & Santosh Shukla & Ashwin Bhagwat & Saurabh Purohit & Sanjay Dhir & Sushil & Harkabir Singh Jandu & Meenal Kukreja & Nitin Kothari & Saurabh Sharma & Shyamashree Das & Gunjan Taneja & Raj, 2023. "Modeling a COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign in the State of Madhya Pradesh, India," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 143-161, March.
    4. Chang, Pao-Long & Ho, Shu-Ping & Hsu, Chiung-Wen, 2013. "Dynamic simulation of government subsidy policy effects on solar water heaters installation in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 385-396.
    5. Meimei Wang & Steffen Flessa, 2020. "Modelling Covid-19 under uncertainty: what can we expect?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(5), pages 665-668, July.
    6. Karen Minyard & Tina A. Smith & Richard Turner & Bobby Milstein & Lori Solomon, 2018. "Community and programmatic factors influencing effective use of system dynamic models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 154-171, January.
    7. Bianca Cezara Archip & Ioan Banatean-Dunea & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2023. "Determinants of Food Waste in Cluj-Napoca (Romania): A Community-Based System Dynamics Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    9. Erika Palmer, 2018. "The Heavy Cost of Care: Systemic Challenges in Norwegian Work Absenteeism," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Sanjib Saha & Jonas Nordstrom & Ulf-G Gerdtham & Irene Mattisson & Peter M Nilsson & Peter Scarborough, 2019. "Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer Mortality by Achieving Healthy Dietary Goals for the Swedish Population: A Macro-Simulation Modelling Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-11, March.
    11. Kenter, Jasper O., 2016. "Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 291-307.
    12. Douglas J. Crookes & James N. Blignaut, 2015. "Debunking the Myth that a Legal Trade will Solve the Rhino Horn Crisis: A System Dynamics Model for Market Demand," Working Papers 201533, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    13. Fatemeh Mohammadyari & Ardavan Zarandian & Mir Mehrdad Mirsanjari & Jurate Suziedelyte Visockiene & Egle Tumeliene, 2023. "Modelling Impact of Urban Expansion on Ecosystem Services: A Scenario-Based Approach in a Mixed Natural/Urbanised Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Montira J. Pongsiri & Andrea M. Bassi, 2021. "A Systems Understanding Underpins Actions at the Climate and Health Nexus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Maryam Yazdanparast & Mehdi Ghorbani & Ali Salajegheh & Reza Kerachian, 2023. "Development of a Water Security Conceptual Model by Combining Human-Environmental System (HES) and System Dynamic Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(4), pages 1695-1709, March.
    16. Simon K Chiu & Louise Freebairn & Louise A Baur & L. Kurt Kreuger & Adam Skinner & Jo‐An Occhipinti, 2023. "Modeling distribution parameters in system dynamics: an application in childhood obesity," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 103-124, April.
    17. Langarudi, Saeed P. & Maxwell, Connie M. & Bai, Yining & Hanson, Austin & Fernald, Alexander, 2019. "Does Socioeconomic Feedback Matter for Water Models?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 35-45.
    18. Jericó-Daminello, C. & Schröter, B. & Mancilla Garcia, M. & Albert, C., 2021. "Exploring perceptions of stakeholder roles in ecosystem services coproduction," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    19. Mert Edali, 2022. "Pattern‐oriented analysis of system dynamics models via random forests," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 135-166, April.
    20. Xinyu Ouyang & Xiangyu Luo, 2022. "Models for Assessing Urban Ecosystem Services: Status and Outlooks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:503:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025000432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.