IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v413y2019ics0304380019303357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local management in a regional context: Simulations with process-based species distribution models

Author

Listed:
  • Szewczyk, Tim M.
  • Lee, Tom
  • Ducey, Mark J.
  • Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E.
  • Bibaud, Hayley
  • Allen, Jenica M.

Abstract

Ecological models often strive to inform conservation and management decisions. Occurrence-based distribution models may aid regional management strategies, though many management decisions require information beyond the likely presence of a species provided by such models. Process-based distribution models predict geographic distributions using environmental relationships with biological processes, providing more detailed predictions and a key opportunity for data-driven management. Here, we develop and characterize a novel demography-based regional distribution model and illustrate its use by comparing four management strategies for glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus), a bird-dispersed shrub invasive throughout the northeastern United States. On a gridded landscape in southern New Hampshire and Maine, this population-level simulation includes fruiting, seed dispersal, seed bank dynamics, germination and establishment, and annual survival, with land cover as the dominant environmental driver. We parameterize the model with field and lab studies, supplementing with published data, expert knowledge, and pattern-oriented parameterization with historical records. In a comprehensive sensitivity analysis, we found that the age at which individuals are capable of reproduction and the frequency of long distance dispersal had the strongest influence on the distribution. In our management simulations, we found that immigration prevents total eradication within any property regardless of management frequency or coordination, though management impacts are detectable in nearby un-managed cells via reduced seed deposition. The flexible model structure combines multiple disparate data sources similar to those available for many species into a synthetic framework of local and regional biological processes, allows the incorporation of specific management actions targeting particular processes and life stages into the regional context of a process-based species distribution model, and provides a robust method for evaluating potential management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Szewczyk, Tim M. & Lee, Tom & Ducey, Mark J. & Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E. & Bibaud, Hayley & Allen, Jenica M., 2019. "Local management in a regional context: Simulations with process-based species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:413:y:2019:i:c:s0304380019303357
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380019303357
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mestre, Frederico & Risk, Benjamin B. & Mira, António & Beja, Pedro & Pita, Ricardo, 2017. "A metapopulation approach to predict species range shifts under different climate change and landscape connectivity scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 406-414.
    2. Rebecca S. Epanchin-Niell & James E. Wilen, 2015. "Individual and Cooperative Management of Invasive Species in Human-mediated Landscapes," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(1), pages 180-198.
    3. Sims, Charles & Aadland, David & Finnoff, David, 2010. "A dynamic bioeconomic analysis of mountain pine beetle epidemics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2407-2419, December.
    4. Menezes, Jorge F.S. & Kotler, Burt P., 2019. "The generalized ideal free distribution model: Merging current ideal free distribution models into a central framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 47-54.
    5. Daniel Adelman & Adam J. Mersereau, 2008. "Relaxations of Weakly Coupled Stochastic Dynamic Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 712-727, June.
    6. Fern, Rachel R. & Morrison, Michael L. & Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Grant, William E. & Campbell, Tyler A., 2019. "Incorporating biotic relationships improves species distribution models: Modeling the temporal influence of competition in conspecific nesting birds," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Loehle, Craig & Weatherford, Philip, 2017. "Detecting population trends with historical data: Contributions of volatility, low detectability, and metapopulation turnover to potential sampling bias," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 362(C), pages 13-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leins, Johannes A. & Banitz, Thomas & Grimm, Volker & Drechsler, Martin, 2021. "High-resolution PVA along large environmental gradients to model the combined effects of climate change and land use timing: lessons from the large marsh grasshopper," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atallah, Shadi S. & Huang, Ju-Chin & Leahy, Jessica & Bennett, Karen, 2020. "Preference Heterogeneity and Neighborhood Effect in Invasive Species Control: The Case of Glossy Buckthorn in New Hampshire and Maine Forests," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304623, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Shady S. Atallah & Miguel I. Gómez & Jon M. Conrad, 2017. "Specification of Spatial-Dynamic Externalities and Implications for Strategic Behavior in Disease Control," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 93(2), pages 209-229.
    3. Kelly M. Cobourn & Gregory S. Amacher & Robert G. Haight, 2019. "Cooperative Management of Invasive Species: A Dynamic Nash Bargaining Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(4), pages 1041-1068, April.
    4. Santiago R. Balseiro & David B. Brown & Chen Chen, 2021. "Dynamic Pricing of Relocating Resources in Large Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4075-4094, July.
    5. Thomas W. M. Vossen & Dan Zhang, 2015. "Reductions of Approximate Linear Programs for Network Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1352-1371, December.
    6. Kovacs, Kent F. & Haight, Robert G. & Mercader, Rodrigo J. & McCullough, Deborah G., 2014. "A bioeconomic analysis of an emerald ash borer invasion of an urban forest with multiple jurisdictions," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 270-289.
    7. Deligiannis, Michalis & Liberopoulos, George, 2023. "Dynamic ordering and buyer selection policies when service affects future demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Mercedes Esteban-Bravo & Jose M. Vidal-Sanz & Gökhan Yildirim, 2014. "Valuing Customer Portfolios with Endogenous Mass and Direct Marketing Interventions Using a Stochastic Dynamic Programming Decomposition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 621-640, September.
    9. Matthew S. Maxwell & Mateo Restrepo & Shane G. Henderson & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2010. "Approximate Dynamic Programming for Ambulance Redeployment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 266-281, May.
    10. Eli Fenichel & Timothy Richards & David Shanafelt, 2014. "The Control of Invasive Species on Private Property with Neighbor-to-Neighbor Spillovers," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(2), pages 231-255, October.
    11. Habtamu Tilahun Kassahun & Bo Jellesmark Thorsen & Joffre Swait & Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, 2020. "Social Cooperation in the Context of Integrated Private and Common Land Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(1), pages 105-136, January.
    12. Sauré, Antoine & Patrick, Jonathan & Tyldesley, Scott & Puterman, Martin L., 2012. "Dynamic multi-appointment patient scheduling for radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 573-584.
    13. Turgay Ayer & Can Zhang & Anthony Bonifonte & Anne C. Spaulding & Jagpreet Chhatwal, 2019. "Prioritizing Hepatitis C Treatment in U.S. Prisons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 853-873, May.
    14. David B. Brown & James E. Smith, 2013. "Optimal Sequential Exploration: Bandits, Clairvoyants, and Wildcats," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 644-665, June.
    15. Dragos Florin Ciocan & Velibor V. Mišić, 2022. "Interpretable Optimal Stopping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1616-1638, March.
    16. Morag F. Macpherson & Adam Kleczkowski & John R. Healey & Chris Quine & Nick Hanley, 2016. "The Effects of Invasive Pests and Diseases on Strategies for Forest Diversification," Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2016-11, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development.
    17. Kim Meyer Hall & Heidi J. Albers & Majid Alkaee Taleghan & Thomas G. Dietterich, 2018. "Optimal Spatial-Dynamic Management of Stochastic Species Invasions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 403-427, June.
    18. Mila Nambiar & David Simchi‐Levi & He Wang, 2021. "Dynamic Inventory Allocation with Demand Learning for Seasonal Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 750-765, March.
    19. Jones, Benjamin A., 2019. "Tree Shade, Temperature, and Human Health: Evidence from Invasive Species-induced Deforestation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 12-23.
    20. İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın & Robert G. Haight, 2018. "A review of operations research models in invasive species management: state of the art, challenges, and future directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 357-403, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:413:y:2019:i:c:s0304380019303357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.