Author
Listed:
- Chen, Feiyu
- Zhang, Tong
- Cai, Honghui
- Zhu, Zhexin
Abstract
The upward intergenerational transmission of green concepts from children to parents can help promote the transition to green consumption behavior. This process can alter consumer perceptions and behavioral orientation. However, its effectiveness largely depends on parents' pre-existing attitudes toward power distance. It is thus of practical significance to explore the pathways through which environmental education initiated by children affects their parents' consumption behavior, and to analyze how cultural values shape the process by which children receive environmental education that ultimately encourages their parents to adopt green consumption practices. This study introduced the concept of transgenerational education and constructed a model to examine its impact on green consumption behavior under the pervasive moderating effect of power distance orientation. Through two phases of field experiments, we found that child-initiated transgenerational education not only directly influenced their parents' green consumption behavior but also promoted such behavior through two mechanisms: moral persuasion and normative regulation. Furthermore, the power distance orientation had a semi-permeable moderating effect on these pathways. On the one hand, transgenerational education fostered green consumption behavior by enhancing the perception of green parental responsibility, and power distance orientation moderated the relationship between responsibility attribution and green consumption behavior. On the other hand, transgenerational education shaped group norms within families. It exerts normative pressure on behavioral choices and is influenced by the family's level of power distance orientation.
Suggested Citation
Chen, Feiyu & Zhang, Tong & Cai, Honghui & Zhu, Zhexin, 2026.
"Moral persuasion and normative regulation: How transgenerational education influences green consumption behavior with varying power distance orientation,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:248:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001552
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109070
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:248:y:2026:i:c:s0921800926001552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.