IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v235y2025ics0921800925001326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic assessment of increasing tree cover in Kenya: The cost of maintaining forest contiguity

Author

Listed:
  • Bostyn, Paul
  • Brunelle, Thierry

Abstract

As strategies to increase forest cover become more widespread as part of countries' environmental commitments, assessing the trade-offs between economic and environmental aspects of forestry activities is an increasingly pressing issue. This article addresses this question by assessing the cost-effectiveness of increasing forest cover under different land use management strategies that differ in their environmental and economic focus. Our analysis is conducted at the national level in Kenya, a country known for its ambitious environmental policies. Our findings show that prioritizing forest contiguity has a higher economic impact than targeting areas with the lowest opportunity costs, and significantly reduces the cost-effective mitigation potential when applied strictly. In addition, our results suggest that land use strategies affect the shape of the land opportunity cost and marginal abatement cost curves, which may exhibit decreasing and non-convex shapes. Overall, this paper argues that careful consideration of land management systems for increasing forest cover is essential to achieve an optimal balance between environmental benefits and economic costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bostyn, Paul & Brunelle, Thierry, 2025. "Economic assessment of increasing tree cover in Kenya: The cost of maintaining forest contiguity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:235:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925001326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001326
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:235:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925001326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.