IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v213y2023ics0921800923002306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of production structure changes on global CH4 emissions: Evidences from income-based accounting and decomposition analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Xuelei
  • Wu, Xudong
  • Guan, Chenghe
  • Sun, Xudong
  • Zhang, Bo

Abstract

Globalization drives anthropogenic methane (CH4) emissions from upstream to downstream agents through global supply chains. However, previous studies have overlooked the indirect CH4 emissions enabled by primary suppliers. In this study, we use the Ghosh Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) model and Structural Decomposition Analysis (SDA) to explore the temporal changes in global income-based CH4 emissions and decompose the socioeconomic drivers. Our results show that global income-based CH4 emissions increased by 17.21% from 2001 to 2014, with per capita primary inputs and technology being the two key drivers. Specifically, in China and India, income-based CH4 emissions were mainly from agriculture, and input structure was responsible for restraining the growth in CH4 emissions from their agricultural activities. On the other hand, service activities dominated the United States and the European Union, and production output structure was accountable for their emission growth related to service activities. To achieve global CH4 emission mitigation, key sectors of major economies with high income-based CH4 emissions should optimize their primary input structures, production output structure, and production technologies from the supply-side. It is crucial to reduce enabled CH4 emissions in emerging economies, particularly in Asia, through the adjustment of primary input activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Xuelei & Wu, Xudong & Guan, Chenghe & Sun, Xudong & Zhang, Bo, 2023. "Impacts of production structure changes on global CH4 emissions: Evidences from income-based accounting and decomposition analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:213:y:2023:i:c:s0921800923002306
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800923002306
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107967?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2020. "The methane footprint of nations: Stylized facts from a global panel dataset," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Li, Jia Shuo & Zhou, H.W. & Meng, Jing & Yang, Q. & Chen, B. & Zhang, Y.Y., 2018. "Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: A case analysis for Beijing city," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1076-1086.
    3. Duarte, Rosa & Miranda-Buetas, Sara & Sarasa, Cristina, 2021. "Household consumption patterns and income inequality in EU countries: Scenario analysis for a fair transition towards low-carbon economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 1998. "Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 307-324.
    5. Zhang, Zengkai & Zhang, ZhongXiang & Zhu, Kunfu, 2020. "Allocating carbon responsibility: The role of spatial production fragmentation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Zhao, Jun & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Hongdian, 2022. "How does industrial structure adjustment reduce CO2 emissions? Spatial and mediation effects analysis for China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Muhammad Jawad Sajid & Zhang Yu & Syed Abdul Rehman, 2022. "The Coal, Petroleum, and Gas Embedded in the Sectoral Demand-and-Supply Chain: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Yongyou Nie & Yunhuan Gao & He He, 2022. "Modelling Structural Effect and Linkage on Carbon Emissions in China: An Environmentally Extended Semi-Closed Ghosh Input–Output Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Sun, Xudong & Cheng, Xuelei & Guan, Chenghe & Wu, Xiaofang & Zhang, Bo, 2022. "Economic drivers of global and regional CH4 emission growth from the consumption perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Hongguang Liu & Xiaomei Fan, 2017. "Value-Added-Based Accounting of CO 2 Emissions: A Multi-Regional Input-Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Chen, Weiming & Lei, Yalin & Feng, Kuishuang & Wu, Sanmang & Li, Li, 2019. "Provincial emission accounting for CO2 mitigation in China: Insights from production, consumption and income perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    12. Antonin Pottier & Gaëlle Le Treut, 2023. "Quantifying GHG emissions enabled by capital and labor: Economic and gender inequalities in France," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 624-636, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Xudong & Cheng, Xuelei & Guan, Chenghe & Wu, Xiaofang & Zhang, Bo, 2022. "Economic drivers of global and regional CH4 emission growth from the consumption perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Chunli Jin & Qiaoqiao Zhu & Hui Sun, 2023. "Temporal and Spatial Divergence of Embodied Carbon Emissions Transfer and the Drivers—Evidence from China’s Domestic Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Xie, Jun & Zhou, Shaojie & Teng, Fei & Gu, Alun, 2023. "The characteristics and driving factors of household CO2 and non-CO2 emissions in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Zhang, Danyang & Wang, Hui & Löschel, Andreas & Zhou, Peng, 2021. "The changing role of global value chains in CO2 emission intensity in 2000–2014," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Meng, Jing & Zhang, Zengkai & Mi, Zhifu & Anadon, Laura Diaz & Zheng, Heran & Zhang, Bo & Shan, Yuli & Guan, Dabo, 2018. "The role of intermediate trade in the change of carbon flows within China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 303-312.
    6. Zhang, Pengfei & Cai, Wenqiu & Yao, Mingtao & Wang, Zhiyou & Yang, Luzhen & Wei, Wendong, 2020. "Urban carbon emissions associated with electricity consumption in Beijing and the driving factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Yongyou Nie & Yunhuan Gao & He He, 2022. "Modelling Structural Effect and Linkage on Carbon Emissions in China: An Environmentally Extended Semi-Closed Ghosh Input–Output Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Wu, Sanmang & Li, Shantong & Lei, Yalin & Li, Li, 2020. "Temporal changes in China's production and consumption-based CO2 emissions and the factors contributing to changes," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Yue, Wencong & Li, Yangqing & Su, Meirong & Chen, Qionghong & Rong, Qiangqiang, 2023. "Carbon emissions accounting and prediction in urban agglomerations from multiple perspectives of production, consumption and income," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    10. Nishijima, Daisuke, 2017. "The role of technology, product lifetime, and energy efficiency in climate mitigation: A case study of air conditioners in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 340-347.
    11. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Jesper Stage, 2002. "Structural Shifts In Namibian Energy Use: An Input‐Output Approach," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 70(6), pages 1103-1125, September.
    13. Xie, Rui & Wang, Fangfang & Chevallier, Julien & Zhu, Bangzhu & Zhao, Guomei, 2018. "Supply-side structural effects of air pollutant emissions in China: A comparative analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 89-95.
    14. Li, Yilin & Chen, Bin & Li, Chaohui & Li, Zhi & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "Energy perspective of Sino-US trade imbalance in global supply chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Erik Dietzenbacher & Jesper Stage, 2006. "Mixing oil and water? Using hybrid input-output tables in a Structural decomposition analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 85-95.
    16. Lanre Ibrahim, Ridwan & Bello Ajide, Kazeem & Usman, Muhammad & Kousar, Rakhshanda, 2022. "Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 244-256.
    17. Ling Yang & Michael L. Lahr, 2019. "The Drivers of China’s Regional Carbon Emission Change—A Structural Decomposition Analysis from 1997 to 2007," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Rosa Duarte & Vicente Pinilla & Ana Serrano, 2015. "Global water in a global world a long term study on agricultural virtual water flows in the world," Documentos de Trabajo dt2015-03, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Zaragoza.
    19. Mohlin, Kristina & Camuzeaux, Jonathan R. & Muller, Adrian & Schneider, Marius & Wagner, Gernot, 2018. "Factoring in the forgotten role of renewables in CO2 emission trends using decomposition analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 290-296.
    20. Arne J. Nagengast & Robert Stehrer, 2016. "Accounting for the Differences Between Gross and Value Added Trade Balances," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(9), pages 1276-1306, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:213:y:2023:i:c:s0921800923002306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.