Author
Listed:
- Zhou, Yufei
- Li, Shuqin
- Li, Hao
- Wang, Minglan
- Haneklaus, Nils
- Li, Binlin
Abstract
The rapid growth of digital inclusive finance (DIF) has emerged as a pivotal driver of China’s Rural Revitalization Strategy, extending the outcomes of poverty alleviation toward building more resilient and sustainable rural livelihoods. This study investigates the impact mechanisms through which DIF influences farmers’ livelihood resilience (FLR) in China, using panel data from the China Family Panel Survey (CFPS) between 2014 and 2022. A composite index of FLR is constructed using an entropy-based method, while DIF is disaggregated into three dimensions: Coverage Breadth (CB), Usage Depth (UD), and Digitization Level (DL). To assess both causal effects and feature importance, this work employs a two-way fixed-effects regression model in conjunction with XGBoost-SHAP machine learning technique. The findings reveal a steady improvement in FLR over the study period, although regional disparities in resilience are inversely related to the extent of DF penetration. Among the DIF dimensions, CB has the most substantial and consistent positive impact on FLR, whereas UD and DL show more limited effects. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the resilience-enhancing effects of DIF are more significant for self-employed farmers and those who rely on cultivated land. Spatially, DIF has a more significant impact in disaster-prone areas, particularly in eastern China, compared to mountainous regions. These results highlight the importance of expanding targeted DIF initiatives to address spatial and structural inequalities, offering valuable insights for policymakers aiming to strengthen FLR within the broader context of China’s Rural Revitalization Strategy.
Suggested Citation
Zhou, Yufei & Li, Shuqin & Li, Hao & Wang, Minglan & Haneklaus, Nils & Li, Binlin, 2025.
"Digital inclusive finance and resilient livelihoods: Lessons from China’s Rural Revitalization Strategy,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 971-991.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:88:y:2025:i:c:p:971-991
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.031
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:88:y:2025:i:c:p:971-991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.