IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v56y2012i3p664-679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample distribution function based goodness-of-fit test for complex surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jianqiang C.

Abstract

Testing the parametric distribution of a random variable is a fundamental problem in exploratory and inferential statistics. Classical empirical distribution function based goodness-of-fit tests typically require the data to be an independent and identically distributed realization of a certain probability model, and thus would fail when complex sampling designs introduce dependency and selection bias to the realized sample. In this paper, we propose goodness-of-fit procedures for a survey variable. To this end, we introduce several divergence measures between the design weighted estimator of distribution function and the hypothesized distribution, and propose goodness-of-fit tests based on these divergence measures. The test procedures are substantiated by theoretical results on the convergence of the estimated distribution function to the superpopulation distribution function on a metric space. We also provide computational details on how to calculate test p-values, and demonstrate the performance of the proposed test through simulation experiments. Finally, we illustrate the utility of the proposed test through the analysis of US 2004 presidential election data.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jianqiang C., 2012. "Sample distribution function based goodness-of-fit test for complex surveys," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 664-679.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:3:p:664-679
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.09.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947311003343
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2011.09.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lumley, Thomas, 2004. "Analysis of Complex Survey Samples," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i08).
    2. C. Goga & J.-C. Deville & A. Ruiz-Gazen, 2009. "Use of functionals in linearization and composite estimation with application to two-sample survey data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 691-709.
    3. Hervé Cardot & Etienne Josserand, 2011. "Horvitz--Thompson estimators for functional data: asymptotic confidence bands and optimal allocation for stratified sampling," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(1), pages 107-118.
    4. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504, September.
    5. Jiang, Jiming & Lahiri, P., 2006. "Estimation of Finite Population Domain Means: A Model-Assisted Empirical Best Prediction Approach," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 301-311, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. D. Jiménez-Gamero & J. L. Moreno-Rebollo & J. A. Mayor-Gallego, 2018. "On the estimation of the characteristic function in finite populations with applications," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 95-121, March.
    2. Patrice Bertail & Emilie Chautru & Stephan Clémençon, 2017. "Empirical Processes in Survey Sampling with (Conditional) Poisson Designs," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 97-111, March.
    3. Rami V. Tabri & Mathew J. Elias, 2024. "Testing for Restricted Stochastic Dominance under Survey Nonresponse with Panel Data: Theory and an Evaluation of Poverty in Australia," Papers 2406.15702, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Herman Cherniaiev & Robert Pater, 2021. "Estimating the number of entities with vacancies using administrative and online data," Papers 2106.03263, arXiv.org.
    2. Kasy, Maximilian, 2011. "A nonparametric test for path dependence in discrete panel data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 172-175.
    3. Atı̇la Abdulkadı̇roğlu & Joshua D. Angrist & Yusuke Narita & Parag Pathak, 2022. "Breaking Ties: Regression Discontinuity Design Meets Market Design," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 117-151, January.
    4. Ashesh Rambachan & Jonathan Roth, 2020. "Design-Based Uncertainty for Quasi-Experiments," Papers 2008.00602, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    5. Debashis Ghosh, 2004. "Semiparametric methods for the binormal model with multiple biomarkers," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1046, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    6. Brian D. Williamson & Peter B. Gilbert & Marco Carone & Noah Simon, 2021. "Nonparametric variable importance assessment using machine learning techniques," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 9-22, March.
    7. Arie Beresteanu & Francesca Molinari, 2008. "Asymptotic Properties for a Class of Partially Identified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 763-814, July.
    8. Laurent Davezies & Xavier D'Haultfoeuille & Yannick Guyonvarch, 2018. "Asymptotic results under multiway clustering," Papers 1807.07925, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    9. Dominic Edelmann & Tobias Terzer & Donald Richards, 2021. "A Basic Treatment of the Distance Covariance," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 12-25, May.
    10. A Stefano Caria & Grant Gordon & Maximilian Kasy & Simon Quinn & Soha Osman Shami & Alexander Teytelboym, 2024. "An Adaptive Targeted Field Experiment: Job Search Assistance for Refugees in Jordan," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 781-836.
    11. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultfœuille, 2020. "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2964-2996, September.
    12. Abe, Toshihiro & Miyata, Yoichi & Shiohama, Takayuki, 2023. "Bayesian estimation for mode and anti-mode preserving circular distributions," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 136-160.
    13. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity," CeMMAP working papers 08/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    14. Benoumechiara Nazih & Bousquet Nicolas & Michel Bertrand & Saint-Pierre Philippe, 2020. "Detecting and modeling critical dependence structures between random inputs of computer models," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 263-297, January.
    15. Jonathan Wakefield & Taylor Okonek & Jon Pedersen, 2020. "Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 398-418, August.
    16. Zhang, Feipeng & Xu, Yixiong & Fan, Caiyun, 2023. "Nonparametric inference of expectile-based value-at-risk for financial time series with application to risk assessment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Fenton, Alex, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58053, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Marisa Bottiroli Civardi & Renata Targetti Lenti, 2008. "Multiplier Decomposition, Inequality and Poverty in a SAM Framework," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 10(1), pages 31-57, October.
    19. Arun G. Chandrasekhar & Victor Chernozhukov & Francesca Molinari & Paul Schrimpf, 2019. "Best Linear Approximations to Set Identified Functions: With an Application to the Gender Wage Gap," NBER Working Papers 25593, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. repec:cep:sticas:/173 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Yuan Liao & Anna Simoni, 2012. "Semi-parametric Bayesian Partially Identified Models based on Support Function," Papers 1212.3267, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2013.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:3:p:664-679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.