IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0295523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price tag of glaucoma care is minor compared with the total direct and indirect costs of glaucoma: Results from nationwide survey and register data

Author

Listed:
  • Petri K M Purola
  • Joonas Taipale
  • Saku Väätäinen
  • Mika Harju
  • Seppo V P Koskinen
  • Hannu M T Uusitalo

Abstract

Background: The estimations of the economic burden of glaucoma have focused on comparing different treatment modalities; hence, the total direct and indirect costs of glaucoma at population level are not well known. Objective: To estimate the direct and indirect costs of glaucoma and its treatment in Finland. Methods: Economic and glaucoma data were collected from the cross-sectional nationwide Health 2000 health examination survey linked to multiple national registers, which allowed a 13-year follow-up between 1999–2011 among survey participants. Direct costs covered eye- and non-eye-related hospitalizations and outpatient visits, outpatient health care services, and travel costs among participants aged 30 years or older, adjusted for age and sex. Indirect costs covered premature retirement and productivity losses among participants aged 30–64 years. Glaucoma patients (n = 192) were compared with non-glaucomatous population (n = 6,952). Results: The annual additional total direct costs were EUR 2,660/glaucoma patient, EUR 1,769/glaucoma patient with medication, and EUR 3,979/operated glaucoma patient compared with persons without glaucoma. The respective additional total indirect costs were EUR 4,288, EUR 3,246, and EUR 12,902 per year. In total, the additional annual direct and indirect expenditures associated with glaucoma in Finland were EUR 202 million (0.86% of total expenditures of health care) and EUR 71 million (0.03% of the Finnish gross domestic product) arising mainly from non-eye-related hospitalizations and productivity losses, respectively. Conclusion: Glaucoma is associated with an increased health care consumption mainly due to non-eye-related health care, which can be explained by the vision loss as well as increased number of co-morbidities among glaucoma patients. Therefore, glaucoma constitutes a major economic burden for the health care system and society, highlighting the importance of early glaucoma interventions. The difference in direct and indirect costs between glaucoma treatment groups is explained by the uneven distribution of co-morbidities.

Suggested Citation

  • Petri K M Purola & Joonas Taipale & Saku Väätäinen & Mika Harju & Seppo V P Koskinen & Hannu M T Uusitalo, 2023. "Price tag of glaucoma care is minor compared with the total direct and indirect costs of glaucoma: Results from nationwide survey and register data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295523
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295523
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295523&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0295523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lumley, Thomas, 2004. "Analysis of Complex Survey Samples," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i08).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Herman Cherniaiev & Robert Pater, 2021. "Estimating the number of entities with vacancies using administrative and online data," Papers 2106.03263, arXiv.org.
    2. J. Michael Brick & Michael E. Jones, 2008. "Propensity to respond and nonresponse bias," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 51-73.
    3. Jacques Muthusi & Samuel Mwalili & Peter Young, 2019. "%svy_logistic_regression: A generic SAS macro for simple and multiple logistic regression and creating quality publication-ready tables using survey or non-survey data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Urdinola, Piedad & Bejarano, Valeria & Espinosa, Oscar & Do Nascimento Silva, Pedro Luis, 2024. "Estudio de caracterización socioeconómica y demográficade los afiliados al régimen subsidiado de salud, Colombia 2019-2020," Ensayos de Economía 21227, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    5. Zachary P Neal & Brian Brutzman, 2023. "The role of personality in neighborhood satisfaction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Jonathan Wakefield & Taylor Okonek & Jon Pedersen, 2020. "Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 398-418, August.
    7. Fenton, Alex, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58053, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. repec:cep:sticas:/173 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0077941 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Mei‐Chih Meg Tseng & Yi‐Ping Lin & Fu‐Chang Hu & Tsun‐Jen Cheng, 2013. "Risks Perception of Electromagnetic Fields in Taiwan: The Influence of Psychopathology and the Degree of Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 2002-2012, November.
    11. Raphael Nishimura & James Wagner & Michael Elliott, 2016. "Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Non-response Bias: A Simulation Study," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 43-62, April.
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0214057 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:plo:pone00:0140881 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Camelia Herman & Colleen M. Leonard & Perpetua Uhomoibhi & Mark Maire & Delynn Moss & Uwem Inyang & Ado Abubakar & Abiodun Ogunniyi & Nwando Mba & Stacie M. Greby & McPaul I. Okoye & Nnaemeka C. Iriem, 2023. "Non-falciparum malaria infection and IgG seroprevalence among children under 15 years in Nigeria, 2018," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Elijah O. Onsomu & DaKysha Moore & Benta A. Abuya & Peggy Valentine & Vanessa Duren-Winfield, 2013. "Importance of the Media in Scaling-Up HIV Testing in Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
    16. Vinas-Forcade, Jennifer & Seijas, María Noé, 2021. "To teach or not to teach: Negative selection into the teaching profession in Uruguay," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Zhongqi Fan & Amy M. Yang & Marcus Lehr & Ana B. Ronan & Ryan B. Simpson & Kimberly H. Nguyen & Elena N. Naumova & Naglaa H. El-Abbadi, 2024. "Food Insecurity across Age Groups in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Lenis, David & Ackerman, Benjamin & Stuart, Elizabeth A., 2018. "Measuring model misspecification: Application to propensity score methods with complex survey data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 48-57.
    19. Sofia Gil-Clavel & Emilio Zagheni & Valeria Bordone, 2022. "Close Social Networks Among Older Adults: The Online and Offline Perspectives," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 1111-1135, June.
    20. Matthew R. Williams & Terrance D. Savitsky, 2021. "Uncertainty Estimation for Pseudo‐Bayesian Inference Under Complex Sampling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 72-107, April.
    21. repec:plo:pone00:0241259 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Wang, Jianqiang C., 2012. "Sample distribution function based goodness-of-fit test for complex surveys," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 664-679.
    23. Liu, Chia & Olamijuwon, Emmanuel, 2024. "The link between intimate partner violence and spousal resource inequality in lower- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    24. Alejandro Aybar-Flores & Alvaro Talavera & Elizabeth Espinoza-Portilla, 2023. "Predicting the HIV/AIDS Knowledge among the Adolescent and Young Adult Population in Peru: Application of Quasi-Binomial Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-29, March.
    25. Joseph R Starnes & Chiara Di Gravio & Rebecca Irlmeier & Ryan Moore & Vincent Okoth & Ash Rogers & Daniele J Ressler & Troy D Moon, 2021. "Characterizing multidimensional poverty in Migori County, Kenya and its association with depression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.