Frequentist Model Averaging with missing observations
Model averaging or combining is often considered as an alternative to model selection. Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA) is considered extensively and strategies for the application of FMA methods in the presence of missing data based on two distinct approaches are presented. The first approach combines estimates from a set of appropriate models which are weighted by scores of a missing data adjusted criterion developed in the recent literature of model selection. The second approach averages over the estimates of a set of models with weights based on conventional model selection criteria but with the missing data replaced by imputed values prior to estimating the models. For this purpose three easy-to-use imputation methods that have been programmed in currently available statistical software are considered, and a simple recursive algorithm is further adapted to implement a generalized regression imputation in a way such that the missing values are predicted successively. The latter algorithm is found to be quite useful when one is confronted with two or more missing values simultaneously in a given row of observations. Focusing on a binary logistic regression model, the properties of the FMA estimators resulting from these strategies are explored by means of a Monte Carlo study. The results show that in many situations, averaging after imputation is preferred to averaging using weights that adjust for the missing data, and model average estimators often provide better estimates than those resulting from any single model. As an illustration, the proposed methods are applied to a dataset from a study of Duchenne muscular dystrophy detection.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- repec:jss:jstsof:45:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
- Leeb, Hannes & P tscher, Benedikt M., 2005. "Model Selection And Inference: Facts And Fiction," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(01), pages 21-59, February.
- Hannes Leeb & Benedikt M. Potscher, 2003.
"Can One Estimate the Conditional Distribution of Post-Model-Selection Estimators?,"
Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers
1444, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Leeb, Hannes & P tscher, Benedikt M., 2008. "Can One Estimate The Unconditional Distribution Of Post-Model-Selection Estimators?," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(02), pages 338-376, April.
- Leeb, Hannes & Pötscher, Benedikt M., 2005. "Can One Estimate the Unconditional Distribution of Post-Model-Selection Estimators ?," MPRA Paper 72, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Yuan, Zheng & Yang, Yuhong, 2005. "Combining Linear Regression Models: When and How?," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1202-1214, December.
- Yang Y., 2001. "Adaptive Regression by Mixing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 574-588, June.
- Leeb, Hannes & P tscher, Benedikt M., 2003.
"The Finite-Sample Distribution Of Post-Model-Selection Estimators And Uniform Versus Nonuniform Approximations,"
Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(01), pages 100-142, February.
- Hannes Leeb & Benedikt M. Poetscher, 2000. "The Finite-Sample Distribution of Post-Model-Selection Estimators, and Uniform Versus Non-Uniform Approximations," Econometrics 0004001, EconWPA.
- Claeskens, Gerda & Hjort, Nils Lid, 2008. "Minimizing Average Risk In Regression Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(02), pages 493-527, April.
- Bruce E. Hansen, 2007. "Least Squares Model Averaging," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 1175-1189, 07.
- Agostinelli, Claudio, 2002. "Robust model selection in regression via weighted likelihood methodology," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 289-300, February.
- repec:jss:jstsof:21:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
- Nikolay Nenovsky & S. Statev, 2006. "Introduction," Post-Print halshs-00260898, HAL.
- Hansen, Bruce E., 2008. "Least-squares forecast averaging," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 342-350, October.
- Hjort N.L. & Claeskens G., 2003. "Frequentist Model Average Estimators," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 879-899, January.
- Zhou, Yong & Wan, Alan T. K & Wang, Xiaojing, 2008. "Estimating Equations Inference With Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 1187-1199.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:12:p:3336-3347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.