IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v122y2018icp33-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model selection for time series of count data

Author

Listed:
  • Alzahrani, Naif
  • Neal, Peter
  • Spencer, Simon E.F.
  • McKinley, Trevelyan J.
  • Touloupou, Panayiota

Abstract

Selecting between competing statistical models is a challenging problem especially when the competing models are non-nested. An effective algorithm is developed in a Bayesian framework for selecting between a parameter-driven autoregressive Poisson regression model and an observation-driven integer valued autoregressive model when modelling time series count data. In order to achieve this a particle MCMC algorithm for the autoregressive Poisson regression model is introduced. The particle filter underpinning the particle MCMC algorithm plays a key role in estimating the marginal likelihood of the autoregressive Poisson regression model via importance sampling and is also utilised to estimate the DIC. The performance of the model selection algorithms are assessed via a simulation study. Two real-life data sets, monthly US polio cases (1970–1983) and monthly benefit claims from the logging industry to the British Columbia Workers Compensation Board (1985–1994) are successfully analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Alzahrani, Naif & Neal, Peter & Spencer, Simon E.F. & McKinley, Trevelyan J. & Touloupou, Panayiota, 2018. "Model selection for time series of count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 33-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:122:y:2018:i:c:p:33-44
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.01.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947318300033
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2018.01.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Durbin & S. J. Koopman, 2000. "Time series analysis of non‐Gaussian observations based on state space models from both classical and Bayesian perspectives," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(1), pages 3-56.
    2. S. P. Brooks & P. Giudici & G. O. Roberts, 2003. "Efficient construction of reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo proposal distributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 3-39, January.
    3. Víctor Enciso‐Mora & Peter Neal & T. Subba Rao, 2009. "Efficient order selection algorithms for integer‐valued ARMA processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Richard A. Davis, 2003. "Observation-driven models for Poisson counts," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(4), pages 777-790, December.
    5. N. Friel & A. N. Pettitt, 2008. "Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 589-607, July.
    6. Peter Neal & T. Subba Rao, 2007. "MCMC for Integer‐Valued ARMA processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 92-110, January.
    7. Christophe Andrieu & Arnaud Doucet & Roman Holenstein, 2010. "Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 269-342, June.
    8. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    9. Chib S. & Jeliazkov I., 2001. "Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis-Hastings Output," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 270-281, March.
    10. Rong Zhu & Harry Joe, 2006. "Modelling Count Data Time Series with Markov Processes Based on Binomial Thinning," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 725-738, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Randal Douc & François Roueff & Tepmony Sim, 2021. "Necessary and sufficient conditions for the identifiability of observation‐driven models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 140-160, March.
    2. Pinto, Jeronymo Marcondes & Marçal, Emerson Fernandes, 2019. "Cross-validation based forecasting method: a machine learning approach," Textos para discussão 498, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    3. Kai Yang & Han Li & Dehui Wang & Chenhui Zhang, 2021. "Random coefficients integer-valued threshold autoregressive processes driven by logistic regression," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(4), pages 533-557, December.
    4. Juan Carlos Upegui Mejía, 2020. "Transparencia estatal y datos personales : el problema de la publicidad de la información personal en poder del Estado : estudio comparado México-Colombia," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1177, October.
    5. Kai Yang & Yao Kang & Dehui Wang & Han Li & Yajing Diao, 2019. "Modeling overdispersed or underdispersed count data with generalized Poisson integer-valued autoregressive processes," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(7), pages 863-889, October.
    6. Wagner Barreto‐Souza & Hernando Ombao, 2022. "The negative binomial process: A tractable model with composite likelihood‐based inference," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(2), pages 568-592, June.
    7. Schatz, Michael & Wheatley, Spencer & Sornette, Didier, 2022. "The ARMA Point Process and its Estimation," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 164-182.
    8. Maia, Gisele de Oliveira & Barreto-Souza, Wagner & Bastos, Fernando de Souza & Ombao, Hernando, 2021. "Semiparametric time series models driven by latent factor," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1463-1479.
    9. Christian H. Weiß & Martin H.-J. M. Feld & Naushad Mamode Khan & Yuvraj Sunecher, 2019. "INARMA Modeling of Count Time Series," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-37, June.
    10. Rudra, Souman & Tesfagaber, Yohannes Kifle, 2019. "Future district heating plant integrated with municipal solid waste (MSW) gasification for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 881-892.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Víctor Enciso‐Mora & Peter Neal & T. Subba Rao, 2009. "Efficient order selection algorithms for integer‐valued ARMA processes," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Kobayashi, Genya, 2014. "A transdimensional approximate Bayesian computation using the pseudo-marginal approach for model choice," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 167-183.
    3. Ruiz-Cárdenas, Ramiro & Krainski, Elias T. & Rue, Håvard, 2012. "Direct fitting of dynamic models using integrated nested Laplace approximations — INLA," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1808-1828.
    4. N. Friel & A. N. Pettitt, 2008. "Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 589-607, July.
    5. Chan, Joshua C.C. & Grant, Angelia L., 2016. "Fast computation of the deviance information criterion for latent variable models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 847-859.
    6. Hubin, Aliaksandr & Storvik, Geir, 2018. "Mode jumping MCMC for Bayesian variable selection in GLMM," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 281-297.
    7. Liu, Xiaobin & Li, Yong & Yu, Jun & Zeng, Tao, 2022. "Posterior-based Wald-type statistics for hypothesis testing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 83-113.
    8. Ralph D. Snyder & Gael M. Martin & Phillip Gould & Paul D. Feigin, 2007. "An Assessment of Alternative State Space Models for Count Time Series," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 4/07, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    9. Yao Rao & David Harris & Brendan McCabe, 2022. "A semi‐parametric integer‐valued autoregressive model with covariates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 495-516, June.
    10. Ioannis Papageorgiou & Ioannis Kontoyiannis, 2023. "The Bayesian Context Trees State Space Model for time series modelling and forecasting," Papers 2308.00913, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    11. Xing Ju Lee & Christopher C. Drovandi & Anthony N. Pettitt, 2015. "Model choice problems using approximate Bayesian computation with applications to pathogen transmission data sets," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 198-207, March.
    12. Joshua Chan & Arnaud Doucet & Roberto León-González & Rodney W. Strachan, 2018. "Multivariate Stochastic Volatility with Co-Heteroscedasticity," Working Paper series 18-38, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    13. Will Penny & Biswa Sengupta, 2016. "Annealed Importance Sampling for Neural Mass Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Vitoratou, Silia & Ntzoufras, Ioannis & Moustaki, Irini, 2016. "Explaining the behavior of joint and marginal Monte Carlo estimators in latent variable models with independence assumptions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57685, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Harvey,Andrew C., 2013. "Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107034723.
    16. Olivier Parent & James P. LeSage, 2008. "Using the variance structure of the conditional autoregressive spatial specification to model knowledge spillovers," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 235-256.
    17. Vidal, Ignacio & Iglesias, Pilar, 2008. "Comparison between a measurement error model and a linear model without measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 92-102, September.
    18. Roberto León-González, 2019. "Efficient Bayesian inference in generalized inverse gamma processes for stochastic volatility," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 899-920, September.
    19. Jung, Robert C. & Kukuk, Martin & Liesenfeld, Roman, 2006. "Time series of count data: modeling, estimation and diagnostics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 2350-2364, December.
    20. Elaine A. Ferguson & Jason Matthiopoulos & Robert H. Insall & Dirk Husmeier, 2017. "Statistical inference of the mechanisms driving collective cell movement," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 869-890, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:122:y:2018:i:c:p:33-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.