IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v201y2025ip1s0960077925010616.html

Ideological polarization in static networks: A multidimensional approach for opinion alignment

Author

Listed:
  • Di Ciocco, Favio
  • Pérez-Martínez, Hugo
  • Gómez-Gardeñes, Jesús
  • Soriano-Paños, David
  • Balenzuela, Pablo

Abstract

Polarization – characterized by the formation of sharply divided groups holding opposing and often extreme views – has become an increasingly prominent feature of contemporary societies. While numerous studies have examined this phenomenon through the lens of single-issue dynamics, such as public opinion on abortion or immigration, this approach overlooks a critical aspect of real-world discourse: political and social attitudes rarely develop in isolation. Instead, many of these issues are deeply interconnected, shaped by overarching ideological frameworks that guide individuals’ interpretations and position-taking across multiple topics. These frameworks give rise to coherent, yet polarized, worldviews that define and reinforce group boundaries. In this work we propose and study a multi-topic opinion dynamics model that captures these complex inter-dependencies. Each issue is represented as a separate dimension in a shared opinion space, allowing us to model not just attitudes toward individual topics, but also the structure of ideological alignment across them. A key feature of the model is the inclusion of topic correlation, which enables us to explore how ideologically polarized states emerge when opinions on one issue influence attitudes on others. Additionally, the model incorporates homophily—a well-documented social mechanism whereby individuals are more likely to engage with and be influenced by others who are similar to themselves. We analyze the model’s asymptotic behavior by identifying and characterizing its most relevant fixed points, supported by both theoretical insights and numerical simulations. We then investigate how the multi-dimensional structure of opinion space shapes the emergence and stability of polarized states. Finally, we apply the model to empirical data from the American National Election Studies (ANES), interpreting observed opinion patterns through the lens of our framework and situating them within its parameter space.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Ciocco, Favio & Pérez-Martínez, Hugo & Gómez-Gardeñes, Jesús & Soriano-Paños, David & Balenzuela, Pablo, 2025. "Ideological polarization in static networks: A multidimensional approach for opinion alignment," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p1:s0960077925010616
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925010616
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:9216-9221 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Edward L. Glaeser & Bryce A. Ward, 2006. "Myths and Realities of American Political Geography," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 119-144, Spring.
    3. Erik Bran Marino & Jesus M. Benitez-Baleato & Ana Sofia Ribeiro, 2024. "The Polarization Loop: How Emotions Drive Propagation of Disinformation in Online Media—The Case of Conspiracy Theories and Extreme Right Movements in Southern Europe," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Pramukh Nanjundaswamy Vasist & Debashis Chatterjee & Satish Krishnan, 2024. "The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate Speech: A Cross-country Configural Narrative," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 663-688, April.
    5. Guillaume Deffuant & David Neau & Frederic Amblard & Gérard Weisbuch, 2000. "Mixing beliefs among interacting agents," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01n04), pages 87-98.
    6. Sven Banisch & Eckehard Olbrich, 2021. "An Argument Communication Model of Polarization and Ideological Alignment," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 24(1), pages 1-1.
    7. Pérez-Martínez, H. & Bauzá Mingueza, F. & Soriano-Paños, D. & Gómez-Gardeñes, J. & Floría, L.M., 2023. "Polarized opinion states in static networks driven by limited information horizons," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0074516 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen & Bjarke Mørch Mønsted & Philipp Hövel & Sune Lehmann, 2019. "Accelerating dynamics of collective attention," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Simon Schweighofer & Frank Schweitzer & David Garcia, 2020. "A Weighted Balance Model of Opinion Hyperpolarization," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 23(3), pages 1-5.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pranesh, Samana & Gupta, Sayan, 2025. "Exploring cognitive inertia in opinion dynamics using an activity-driven model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Patrick Mellacher, 2021. "Opinion Dynamics with Conflicting Interests," Papers 2111.09408, arXiv.org.
    3. Qi, Yimeng & Zhuang, Songlin & Yu, Xinghu & Zhao, Zhihong & Sun, Weichao & Li, Zhan & Qiu, Jianbin & Shi, Yang & Liu, Fangzhou & del Genio, Charo I. & Boccaletti, Stefano, 2025. "Multi-dimensional multi-option opinion dynamics leads to the emergence of clusters in social networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Huang, Changwei & Bian, Huanyu & Han, Wenchen, 2024. "Breaking the symmetry neutralizes the extremization under the repulsion and higher order interactions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Sven Banisch & Eckehard Olbrich, 2021. "An Argument Communication Model of Polarization and Ideological Alignment," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 24(1), pages 1-1.
    6. Meylahn, Benedikt V. & De Turck, Koen & Mandjes, Michel, 2025. "Trust in society: A stochastic compartmental model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 668(C).
    7. Shang, Lihui & Zhao, Mingming & Ai, Jun & Su, Zhan, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the Sznajd model on interdependent chains," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    8. Felix Kopecky, 2022. "Arguments as Drivers of Issue Polarisation in Debates Among Artificial Agents," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 25(1), pages 1-4.
    9. Floriana Gargiulo & José J Ramasco, 2012. "Influence of Opinion Dynamics on the Evolution of Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    10. Lu, Xi & Mo, Hongming & Deng, Yong, 2015. "An evidential opinion dynamics model based on heterogeneous social influential power," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 98-107.
    11. Brian L. Goff & Michelle W. Trawick, 2017. "Preaching and politics: disentangling religiosity and political choice," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 41(3), pages 595-609, July.
    12. Shan, Yaping, 2025. "Disinformation in group chat social media network," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Walter Bossert & Andrew E. Clark & Conchita d'Ambrosio & Anthony Lepinteur, 2019. "Economic Insecurity and the Rise of the Right," PSE Working Papers halshs-02325984, HAL.
    14. George Butler & Juliette Rouchier & Gabriella Pigozzi, 2021. "Corrigendum to “Mixing Dyadic and Deliberative Opinion Dynamics in an Agent-Based Model of Group Decision-Makingâ€," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-1, February.
    15. Serge Galam, 2016. "The invisible hand and the rational agent are behind bubbles and crashes," Papers 1601.02990, arXiv.org.
    16. Gani Aldashev & Timoteo Carletti & Simone Righi, 2010. "Adaptive Expectations, Confirmatory Bias, and Informational Efficiency," Papers 1009.5075, arXiv.org.
    17. Leonie Geyer & Patrick Mellacher, 2024. "Simulating Party Competition in Dynamic Voter Distributions," Graz Economics Papers 2024-19, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    18. Huang, Changwei & Hou, Yongzhao & Han, Wenchen, 2023. "Coevolution of consensus and cooperation in evolutionary Hegselmann–Krause dilemma with the cooperation cost," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Chen, Jianing & Bao, Peng, 2026. "Nonlinear polarization modeling via dual-threshold diffusion–evolution dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. María Cecilia Gimenez & Luis Reinaudi & Ana Pamela Paz-García & Paulo Marcelo Centres & Antonio José Ramirez-Pastor, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the presence of constant propaganda: homogeneous and localized cases," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(1), pages 1-11, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p1:s0960077925010616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.