IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v192y2025ics0960077924015340.html

The effect of heterogeneous perceptions with environmental feedback on spatial social dilemmas

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Jian
  • Zhang, Ran
  • An, Tianbo
  • Zhang, Huizhen
  • Tong, Daqun
  • Luo, Xun
  • An, Jinjin
  • Wang, Jingrui

Abstract

Heterogeneity as an effective factor influencing cooperation typically stems from the differences between individuals’ subjective characteristics and external objective conditions. However, the interplay between subjective and objective heterogeneity is often overlooked in the evolutionary game. Therefore, we study the evolution of cooperative behavior in populations when external objective environments influence subjective perceptions. Considering that individuals may have different perceptions when facing the same social dilemma and individuals’ perceptions are influenced by the environment, we use the prisoner’s dilemma game and the snowdrift game to build a multigame model in which players’ payoffs are affected by the local environment, i.e., the number of players’ cooperative neighbors. The experimental results suggest that higher levels of perceived heterogeneity and stronger environmental feedback are more conducive to enhancing cooperation levels, but full cooperation still cannot be achieved. Through the analysis of state transition probabilities, we further explain the limitations of environmental feedback on enhancing cooperation. Additionally, we find that the subpopulation playing the snowdrift game is more sensitive to environmental changes. We also perform sensitivity analysis and verify the robustness of our mechanism. Our explorations may help to understand how heterogeneity may affect the survival and maintenance of cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Jian & Zhang, Ran & An, Tianbo & Zhang, Huizhen & Tong, Daqun & Luo, Xun & An, Jinjin & Wang, Jingrui, 2025. "The effect of heterogeneous perceptions with environmental feedback on spatial social dilemmas," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0960077924015340
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924015340
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jingrui & Zhang, Huizhen & An, Tianbo & Jin, Xing & Wang, Chao & Zhao, Jian & Wang, Zhen, 2024. "Effect of vaccine efficacy on vaccination behavior with adaptive perception," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    2. Fernando P. Santos & Francisco C. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2018. "Social norm complexity and past reputations in the evolution of cooperation," Nature, Nature, vol. 555(7695), pages 242-245, March.
    3. Li, Zhibin & Jia, Danyang & Guo, Hao & Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Wang, Zhen & Li, Xuelong, 2019. "The effect of multigame on cooperation in spatial network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 162-167.
    4. Huang, Keke & Liu, Yishun & Zhang, Yichi & Yang, Chunhua & Wang, Zhen, 2018. "Understanding cooperative behavior of agents with heterogeneous perceptions in dynamic networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 234-240.
    5. Wang, Jingrui & Zhang, Huizhen & Jin, Xing & Ma, Leyu & Chen, Yueren & Wang, Chao & Zhao, Jian & An, Tianbo, 2023. "Subsidy policy with punishment mechanism can promote voluntary vaccination behaviors in structured populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Erez Lieberman & Christoph Hauert & Martin A. Nowak, 2005. "Evolutionary dynamics on graphs," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7023), pages 312-316, January.
    7. Guo, Tian & Guo, Mi & Zhang, Yan & Liang, Shuanglu, 2019. "The effect of aspiration on the evolution of cooperation in spatial multigame," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 27-32.
    8. Hu, Kaipeng & Guo, Hao & Geng, Yini & Shi, Lei, 2019. "The effect of conformity on the evolution of cooperation in multigame," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 267-272.
    9. Blume Lawrence E., 1993. "The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 387-424, July.
    10. Guo, Yujie & Zhang, Liming & Li, Haihong & Dai, Qionglin & Yang, Junzhong, 2023. "Network adaption based on environment feedback promotes cooperation in co-evolutionary games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 617(C).
    11. Andrew R. Tilman & Joshua B. Plotkin & Erol Akçay, 2020. "Evolutionary games with environmental feedbacks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999. "A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868.
    13. Ding, Fei & Liu, Yun & Shen, Bo & Si, Xia-Meng, 2010. "An evolutionary game theory model of binary opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(8), pages 1745-1752.
    14. David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene & Martin A. Nowak, 2012. "Spontaneous giving and calculated greed," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7416), pages 427-430, September.
    15. Zhang, Huizhen & An, Tianbo & Yan, Pingping & Hu, Kaipeng & An, Jinjin & Shi, Lijuan & Zhao, Jian & Wang, Jingrui, 2024. "Exploring cooperative evolution with tunable payoff’s loners using reinforcement learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    16. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    17. Paul B. Rainey & Katrina Rainey, 2003. "Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6953), pages 72-74, September.
    18. Lu, Shounan & Zhu, Ge & Zhang, Lianzhong, 2023. "Antisocial behavior-based environmental feedback in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. He, Jialu & Cui, Lei, 2024. "The persistence-based game transition resolves the social dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    20. Arnon Lotem & Michael A. Fishman & Lewi Stone, 1999. "Evolution of cooperation between individuals," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6741), pages 226-227, July.
    21. Chen Shen & Zhixue He & Hao Guo & Shuyue Hu & Jun Tanimoto & Lei Shi & Petter Holme, 2024. "Beyond a binary theorizing of prosociality," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121(49), pages 2412195121-, December.
    22. Ma, Yongjuan & Lu, Jun & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Diversity of neighborhoods promotes cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 212-218.
    23. Wang, Qun & Wang, Hanchen & Zhang, Zhuxi & Li, Yumeng & Liu, Yu & Perc, Matjaž, 2018. "Heterogeneous investments promote cooperation in evolutionary public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 570-575.
    24. Bin, Liu & Yue, Wu, 2023. "Co-evolution of reputation-based preference selection and resource allocation with multigame on interdependent networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    25. Ádám Kun & Ulf Dieckmann, 2013. "Resource heterogeneity can facilitate cooperation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, December.
    26. Chu, Chen & Cui, Simin & Yuan, Zheng & Yu, Chunbin, 2022. "A win-stay-lose-learn mechanism based on aspiration can promote cooperation in a multigame," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    27. Ernst Fehr & Simon Gächter, 2002. "Altruistic punishment in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6868), pages 137-140, January.
    28. Li, Minlan & Liu, Yan-Ping & Han, Yanyan & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2022. "Environmental heterogeneity unifies the effect of spatial structure on the altruistic cooperation in game-theory paradigms," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    29. Liu, Yujie & Li, Zemin & Jin, Xing & Tao, Yuchen & Ding, Hong & Wang, Zhen, 2022. "The effect of perceptions competition and learning costs on cooperation in spatial evolutionary multigames," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    30. Li, Jiaqi & Zhang, Jianlei & Chen, Zengqiang & Liu, Qun, 2023. "Aspiration drives adaptive switching between two different payoff matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    31. Shu, Feng & Liu, Yaojun & Liu, Xingwen & Zhou, Xiaobing, 2019. "Memory-based conformity enhances cooperation in social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 480-490.
    32. Sun, Chengbin & Wang, Chaoqian & Xia, Haoxiang, 2024. "Co-evolution of cooperation and extortion with resource allocation in spatial multigame," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Chengbin & de Miguel-Arribas, Alfonso & Wang, Chaoqian & Xia, Haoxiang & Moreno, Yamir, 2025. "Co-evolution of cooperation and resource allocation in the advantageous environment-based spatial multi-game using adaptive control," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P1).
    2. Li, Jiaqi & Zhang, Jianlei & Liu, Qun, 2024. "Spatial game with multiple interaction patterns in constrained interaction environment: A computational method based on opponent’s ability," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Yang, Yujin & Zhao, Dawei & Wang, Juan, 2025. "Evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games driven by reinforcement learning and environmental feedback," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P1).
    5. Li, Minlan & Liu, Yan-Ping & Han, Yanyan & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2022. "Environmental heterogeneity unifies the effect of spatial structure on the altruistic cooperation in game-theory paradigms," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Shu, Feng, 2020. "A win-switch-lose-stay strategy promotes cooperation in the evolutionary games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 555(C).
    7. Yao Meng & Sean P. Cornelius & Yang-Yu Liu & Aming Li, 2024. "Dynamics of collective cooperation under personalised strategy updates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Christian Hilbe & Moshe Hoffman & Martin A. Nowak, 2015. "Cooperate without Looking in a Non-Repeated Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Simon Gächter & Lucas Molleman & Daniele Nosenzo, 2025. "Why people follow rules," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 1342-1354, July.
    10. Wang, Xinghua & Navarro-Martinez, Daniel, 2023. "Increasing the external validity of social preference games by reducing measurement error," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 261-285.
    11. Xiang Wei & Peng Xu & Shuiting Du & Guanghui Yan & Huayan Pei, 2021. "Reputational preference-based payoff punishment promotes cooperation in spatial social dilemmas," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(10), pages 1-7, October.
    12. Zha, Jiajing & Li, Cong & Fan, Suohai, 2022. "The effect of stability-based strategy updating on cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    13. Yu, Fengyuan & Wang, Jianwei & He, Jialu, 2022. "Inequal dependence on members stabilizes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    14. Rebekka Kesberg & Stefan Pfattheicher, 2019. "Democracy matters: a psychological perspective on the beneficial impact of democratic punishment systems in social dilemmas," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Liu, Xuesong & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng & Liu, Aizhi, 2019. "Promotion of cooperation in evolutionary game dynamics under asymmetric information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 258-266.
    16. Li, Jiaqi & Zhang, Jianlei & Chen, Zengqiang & Liu, Qun, 2023. "Aspiration drives adaptive switching between two different payoff matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    17. Shirsendu Podder & Simone Righi, 2023. "Complexity of Behavioural Strategies and Cooperation in the Optional Public Goods Game," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1219-1235, December.
    18. Liu, Jiaqi & Zhang, Qianwei, 2025. "Evolutionary dynamics of a probabilistic punishment mechanism with environmental feedback in regular networked Prisoner's Dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Deng, Kuiying & Li, Zhuozheng & Kurokawa, Shun & Chu, Tianguang, 2012. "Rare but severe concerted punishment that favors cooperation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(4), pages 284-291.
    20. Li, Yipeng & Hu, Xiangyue & Jin, Xing & Zhang, Huizhen & Yang, Jiajia & Wang, Zhen, 2025. "Environmental information perception enhances cooperation in stochastic public goods games via Q-learning," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 504(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0960077924015340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.