IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v69y2026i1p43-53.html

Pay transparency: How much disclosure do employees want?

Author

Listed:
  • Heisler, William

Abstract

Pay transparency remains an important issue today in compensation practices within business organizations. Much of the discussion surrounding pay transparency, however, treats it as a unidimensional concept and does not explore employee preferences regarding the type and level of disclosure. This study provides insight into how much and what kind of data about pay employees truly seek from employers. Using the Prolific data-collection platform for academic research, a survey was administered to 600 participants from a pool of nearly 2,500 full-time US employees of companies listed on a US stock exchange. The survey results indicate that a majority of employees want to know more about how compensation is determined and prefer that pay grades/ranges be disclosed for all jobs in an organization. But considerable differences in preferences exist between generations concerning the disclosure of individual pay data. Disclosure preferences were also compared with perceptions regarding the existence of gender and racial pay gaps. Employees who perceive that significant gender and racial pay disparities exist within organizations prefer higher levels of pay disclosure. The findings from this survey may assist organizations in developing policies and practices related to the disclosure of pay data.

Suggested Citation

  • Heisler, William, 2026. "Pay transparency: How much disclosure do employees want?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 43-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:69:y:2026:i:1:p:43-53
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2024.11.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324001629
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.11.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:69:y:2026:i:1:p:43-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.