IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v68y2025i4p491-500.html

Storytelling through social media: How organizations and leaders can support peacebuilding efforts

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Gordon B.
  • Simha, Aditya

Abstract

In this article, we discuss how business for peace (B4P) organizations can help peacebuilding efforts by using storytelling principles and by harnessing social media. Storytelling can help stakeholders and the public to understand peace initiatives and to develop support for them. Social media offers a medium for sharing stories and even for engaging in cocreation with stakeholders related to messages of peace. We discuss the role of leaders of B4P organizations in peacebuilding, and we describe the various forms of narratives that can be utilized in social media storytelling. We next discuss four types of challenges and opportunities B4P organizations will face in using storytelling on social media to achieve peace. We conclude by discussing how best to meet those challenges and opportunities for successful peacebuilding on social media.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Gordon B. & Simha, Aditya, 2025. "Storytelling through social media: How organizations and leaders can support peacebuilding efforts," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 491-500.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:4:p:491-500
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2025.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681325000746
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard J. Jansen & Mimi Zhang & Kate Sobel & Abdur Chowdury, 2009. "Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2169-2188, November.
    2. Rettberg, Angelika, 2016. "Need, creed, and greed: Understanding why business leaders focus on issues of peace," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 481-492.
    3. Eero Vaara & Scott Sonenshein & David Boje, 2016. "Narratives as Sources of Stability and Change in Organizations : Approaches and Directions for Future Research," Post-Print hal-02313402, HAL.
    4. Banks, Hamish, 2016. "The business of peace: Coca-Cola's contribution to stability, growth, and optimism," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 455-461.
    5. Eero Vaara & Scott Sonenshein & David Boje, 2016. "Narratives as Sources of Stability and Change in Organizations : Approaches and Directions for Future Research," Post-Print hal-02276673, HAL.
    6. Gregory D. Saxton & Charlotte Ren & Chao Guo, 2021. "Responding to Diffused Stakeholders on Social Media: Connective Power and Firm Reactions to CSR-Related Twitter Messages," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 229-252, August.
    7. Andrew P. Owsiak & Paul F. Diehl & Gary Goertz, 2017. "Border settlement and the movement toward and from negative peace," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(2), pages 176-193, March.
    8. Maria Besiou & Mark Hunter & Luk Wassenhove, 2013. "A Web of Watchdogs: Stakeholder Media Networks and Agenda-Setting in Response to Corporate Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 709-729, December.
    9. Tilman Brück & Wim Naudé & Philip Verwimp, 2011. "Small Business, Entrepreneurship and Violent Conflict in Developing Countries," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/280152, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Melin, Molly M., 2016. "Business, peace, and world politics: The role of third parties in conflict resolution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 493-501.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Forrer, John J. & Fort, Timothy L., 2016. "The PACO index," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 533-538.
    2. John E. Katsos & Yass AlKafaji, 2019. "Business in War Zones: How Companies Promote Peace in Iraq," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 41-56, March.
    3. Rory McDonald & Cheng Gao, 2019. "Pivoting Isn’t Enough? Managing Strategic Reorientation in New Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1289-1318, November.
    4. Yuliia Kyrdoda & Marco Balzano & Donata Vianelli, 2025. "The formation of a sustainable organizational identity: Insights from Brazilian coffee producers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Tarba, Shlomo, 2021. "Knowledge hiding and knowledge sharing in small family farms: A stewardship view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 279-292.
    6. Hoelscher, Kristian & Ainembabazi, Triphine & Mbabazi, Judith & Mukwaya, Paul & Rolandsen, Øystein H., 2025. "“Peace is when we are working”: Insecurity and small business survival in Kampala," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 525-539.
    7. Nicolas B. Verger & Raffi Duymedjian & Vlad P Glăveanu, 2025. "The meritocracy of preservation: Reimagining merit beyond production [La méritocratie de la préservation : repenser le mérite au-delà de la production]," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-05422094, HAL.
    8. Jeffrey S. Bednar & Benjamin M. Galvin & Blake E. Ashforth & Ella Hafermalz, 2020. "Putting Identification in Motion: A Dynamic View of Organizational Identification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 200-222, January.
    9. J. Laine, Lauri & Kibler, Ewald, 2018. "Towards a mythic process philosophy of entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 81-86.
    10. Nicolas B. Verger & Raffi Duymedjian & Vlad P Glăveanu, 2025. "The meritocracy of preservation: Reimagining merit beyond production [La méritocratie de la préservation : repenser le mérite au-delà de la production]," Post-Print hal-05422094, HAL.
    11. Alperen Manisaligil & Ummugulsum Aysan, 2022. "Sustainability Narratives: A Social Constructivist Perspective on Interorganizational Projects," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 72(72-2), pages 1001-1024, December.
    12. Mukta Kulkarni, 2024. "Narrating a Prototypical Disabled Employee," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(4), pages 781-796, February.
    13. João Cotter Salvado & Donal Crilly, 2025. "Analyst Reaction to War-Related Language: Source Domains and the Role of Market Structure and Market Share," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1690-1725, September.
    14. Chernyi, Alex & Uotila, Juha, 2024. "Prioritization of organizational stakeholders: A managerial decision-making perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    15. Natalya Sergeeva & Johan Ninan, 2023. "Comparisons as a discursive tool: shaping megaproject narratives in the United Kingdom," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(2), pages 197-211.
    16. Ilkka Tuomi, 2019. "Chronotopes of foresight: Models of time‐space in probabilistic, possibilistic and constructivist futures," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), June.
    17. Tomas Casas-Klett & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative as a narrative: Implications for institutional change and international firm strategy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 857-873, September.
    18. Teea Palo, 2023. "The Emergence of Concerned Partnerships in the Ethical Marketization of Place: A Narrative Lens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 835-854, May.
    19. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Schuler, Benedikt Alexander & Orr, Kevin & Hughes, Jeffrey, 2023. "My colleagues (do not) think the same: Middle managers’ shared and separate realities in strategy implementation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:4:p:491-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.