IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v64y2021i4p553-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Businesspeople: Academics need your help to make business research relevant

Author

Listed:
  • Huffman, Brian
  • Benson, Joy

Abstract

In the last two decades, industry-university collaborations (IUCs) in research and development in the hard sciences have become increasingly more successful and common. In contrast, successful IUCs in softer social sciences, such as business, remain relatively uncommon. But business research requires an even higher degree of collaboration than research in the hard sciences if its results are to be relevant to businesspeople. Fortunately, business academics are becoming more and more interested in collaborating with businesspeople. The purpose of this article is to motivate businesspeople to collaborate as well. We do this by showing the businessperson the historical origins of business research’s irrelevance, by describing the benefits the business world could receive from collaborative research, by showing why collaboration is especially needed in social sciences such as business, and by showing why academics cannot do relevant business research without practitioners’ help. Specifically, we will show that the businessperson’s help is needed to ensure that their priorities are met, to formulate the right research questions, to provide relevant data, and to contribute their problem-solving inventiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Huffman, Brian & Benson, Joy, 2021. "Businesspeople: Academics need your help to make business research relevant," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 553-562.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:64:y:2021:i:4:p:553-562
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681321000203
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel Bothello & Thomas J. Roulet, 2019. "The Imposter Syndrome, or the Mis‐Representation of Self in Academic Life," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 854-861, June.
    2. Robert Rybnicek & Roland Königsgruber, 2019. "What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 221-250, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu Yu & Shuangshuang Zhang & Takaya Yuizono, 2021. "Exploring the Influences of Innovation Climate and Resource Endowments through Two Types of University–Industry Collaborative Activities on Regional Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Lianne Foti & Lance Warwick & Eric Lyons & Sonia Dhaliwal & Michael Alcorn, 2023. "Knowledge Transfer and Innovation: Universities as Catalysts for Sustainable Decision Making in Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Chung, Jaemin & Ko, Namuk & Yoon, Janghyeok, 2021. "Inventor group identification approach for selecting university-industry collaboration partners," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. József Tóth & Giuseppina Rizzo, 2020. "Search Strategies in Innovation Networks: The Case of the Hungarian Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Christopher Wickert & Corinne Post & Jonathan P. Doh & John E. Prescott & Andrea Prencipe, 2021. "Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 297-320, March.
    6. Leonie Koch & Martin Simmler, 2020. "How Important are Local Knowledge Spillovers of Public R&D and What Drives Them?," EconPol Working Paper 42, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    7. Robertson, Jeandri & Caruana, Albert & Ferreira, Caitlin, 2023. "Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    8. Aydemir, Nisa Yazici & Huang, Wan-Ling & Welch, Eric W., 2022. "Late-stage academic entrepreneurship: Explaining why academic scientists collaborate with industry to commercialize their patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Noack, Anika, 2022. "Knowledge and Technology Transfer under Digital Conditions: Transfer Intermediaries in Eastern Germany and the Role of Digital Means, Trust and Face-to-Face Interactions," fast track to transfer – Working Paper Series 004, Technical University of Wildau and the Brandenburg Technical University of Cottbus-Senftenberg, Innovation Hub 13 - fast track to transfer.
    10. Myrzakhmet, Marat & Myrzakhmet, Zhanat & Myrzakhmet, Bolat, 2021. "Активность И Кооперация Университета, Бизнеса И Государства В Акмолинской Области Республики Казахстан [Activity and cooperation of the university, business, and government in the Akmola region of ," MPRA Paper 106143, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Bojan Ćudić & Peter Alešnik & David Hazemali, 2022. "Factors impacting university–industry collaboration in European countries," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Noman Arshed & Waqas Ahmad & Uzma Hanif, 2022. "A Spatial Temporal Exploration of Factors Motivating Academia-Industry Collaboration," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 521-540, March.
    13. Katarina Rojko & Brankica Bratić & Borut Lužar, 2020. "The Bologna reform’s impacts on the scientific publication performance of Ph.D. graduates—the case of Slovenia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 329-356, July.
    14. Teng, Sin Yong & Touš, Michal & Leong, Wei Dong & How, Bing Shen & Lam, Hon Loong & Máša, Vítězslav, 2021. "Recent advances on industrial data-driven energy savings: Digital twins and infrastructures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    15. Karl-Heinz Leitner & Sabine Bergner & Robert Rybnicek, 2021. "The role of heads of departments in the commercialization of university research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 353-378, April.
    16. Rosivalda Pereira & Mário Franco, 2023. "University-Firm Cooperation and Regional Development: Proposal of a Model of Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 676-690, June.
    17. Huimin Xu & Yi Bu & Meijun Liu & Chenwei Zhang & Mengyi Sun & Yi Zhang & Eric Meyer & Eduardo Salas & Ying Ding, 2022. "Team power dynamics and team impact: New perspectives on scientific collaboration using career age as a proxy for team power," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(10), pages 1489-1505, October.
    18. Stanley Murairwa, 2021. "A Sustainable Zimbabwe University – Industry Collaboration Framework," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(6), pages 160-168, June.
    19. Karine Revet & Isabel Maria Bodas-Freitas & Barthélemy Chollet & Pablo D’Este, 2023. "Exploring resource seeking in a scientific collaboration network and its effect on scientists' knowledge creation," Working Papers of BETA 2023-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    20. Poulis, Konstantinos & Kastanakis, Minas, 2020. "On theorizing and methodological fetishism," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 676-683.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:64:y:2021:i:4:p:553-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.