IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v365y2024ics0306261924005749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-Energetical analysis of circular economy and community-based virtual power plants (CE-cVPP): A systems engineering-engaged life cycle assessment (SE-LCA) method for sustainable renewable energy development

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Haonan
  • Goh, Hui Hwang
  • Zhang, Dongdong
  • Sun, Hui
  • Dai, Wei
  • Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono
  • Dennis Wong, M.L.
  • Teo, Kenneth Tze Kin
  • Goh, Kai Chen

Abstract

Amidst the escalating complexity of energy demands and climate concerns, natural calamities, and the Black Swan phenomenon have all presented formidable obstacles to the advancement and implementation of renewable energy sources. In light of the present backlog of studies in energy technology, the three primary issues identified and resolved in this study are inadequate analysis of the actual situation, absence of evidence of sustainable development, and flawed systematic methodology. This study proposes a novel renewable energy development initiative known as the circular economy and community-based virtual power plant (CE-cVPP). By integrating community participation and circular economy principles, this initiative aims to foster sustainable development and facilitate resilient progress. The principal focuses of the model are community renewable energy supply, energy demand, and community participation management. The sustainable framework is constructed upon the principles of circular economy theory. The systems engineering-based life cycle assessment (SE-LCA) method is proposed as an innovative approach to whole life cycle assessment that is grounded in systems engineering. Its purpose is to facilitate a systematic implementation and empirical evaluation of the sustainability of energy, the environment, and the economy. On the basis of disparities in renewable energy sources and a variety of spatiotemporal dimensions, CE-cVPP is categorised into four representative groups. We present a business community model for energy and environmental analysis that is based on a hospital in Harbin. The results suggest that the overall lifecycle primary energy conservation rate is 67.21%, which is an exceptional outcome that significantly promotes sustainable development in comparison to conventional methods. This improves environmental and human health protection as the full lifecycle emission reduction ratios for atmospheric pollutants are 53.50% (SO2-eq.), 51.69% (PM2.5-eq.), and 74.85% (CO2-eq.). Consideration is given to raw materials, equipment construction, equipment operation, tariffs on six pollutants, and material recycling when calculating the total cost. The annual total cost savings ratio for the full lifecycle is 54.21% when compared to the traditional system. This research possesses methodological and theoretical applicability to the energy and power sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Haonan & Goh, Hui Hwang & Zhang, Dongdong & Sun, Hui & Dai, Wei & Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono & Dennis Wong, M.L. & Teo, Kenneth Tze Kin & Goh, Kai Chen, 2024. "Eco-Energetical analysis of circular economy and community-based virtual power plants (CE-cVPP): A systems engineering-engaged life cycle assessment (SE-LCA) method for sustainable renewable energy de," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:365:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924005749
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924005749
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:365:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924005749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.