IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v356y2024ics0306261923017671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of social welfare and mitigating privacy risks in P2P energy trading: Differential privacy for secure data reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed, Syed Adrees
  • Huang, Qi
  • Zhang, Zhenyuan
  • Li, Jian
  • Amin, Waqas
  • Afzal, Muhammad
  • Hussain, Jawad
  • Hussain, Fazal

Abstract

With the growing demand for energy and the integration of distributed energy resources (DERs), Peer-to-Peer (P2P) energy trading has emerged as a promising approach that enables participants in the energy market to coordinate and trade energy. However, due to the intermittent generation from DERs and irregular load patterns, energy shortages can occur in the P2P market. To address this issue, an effective demand response-based energy allocation policy is proposed with usage-based billing in the P2P market that differentiates cooperative and non-cooperative buyers based on the supply-to-demand ratio. In general, monitoring buyers' demand and sellers' generation data is performed to formulate contracts, posing risks to participants' privacy. The utility grid requires this data for timely decision-making regarding load forecasting and demand response programs. However, real-time reporting of this data in the P2P market can inadvertently reveal participants' lifestyles, potentially leading to privacy breaches. To mitigate this issue, Differential Privacy (DP) is integrated to preserve participants' privacy. Extensive simulations are performed over the one-year dataset, demonstrating the proposed method's effectiveness that maximizes social welfare, ensures data privacy, and enhances participant satisfaction. The results indicate an average reduction in energy costs, ranging from 9.83% to 27.86% for all buyers, and an average increase in revenues, ranging from 5.42% to 10.69% for all sellers, compared to the previously proposed study and the grid, respectively. This research contributes to the advancement of P2P energy trading by providing an innovative approach that simultaneously addresses available energy, privacy concerns, satisfaction level, and economic benefits for participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed, Syed Adrees & Huang, Qi & Zhang, Zhenyuan & Li, Jian & Amin, Waqas & Afzal, Muhammad & Hussain, Jawad & Hussain, Fazal, 2024. "Optimization of social welfare and mitigating privacy risks in P2P energy trading: Differential privacy for secure data reporting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:356:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923017671
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923017671
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juho Hamari & Mimmi Sjöklint & Antti Ukkonen, 2016. "The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(9), pages 2047-2059, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    2. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    3. Joan Torrent-Sellens & Cristian Salazar-Concha & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Francesc Saigí-Rubió, 2021. "Using Digital Platforms to Promote Blood Donation: Motivational and Preliminary Evidence from Latin America and Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Bruno Bruna & Faggini Marisa, 2020. "Sharing Competition: An Agent-Based Model for the Short-Term Accommodations Market," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Lucia Rotaris, 2021. "Carsharing Services in Italy: Trends and Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Daisy Bertrand & Pierre-Yves Léo & Jean Philippe, 2019. "The New Go-Between Services: Peer-To-Peer Sharing Platforms In Hospitality Services," Post-Print hal-02299130, HAL.
    7. Vincenzo Vignieri, 2021. "Crowdsourcing as a mode of open innovation: Exploring drivers of success of a multisided platform through system dynamics modelling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 108-124, January.
    8. Puiu Andreea-Ionela, 2020. "Motivations of Young Consumers to Participate to Collaborative Consumption," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 43-55, December.
    9. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Sandström, Christian, 2020. "Digital Disruption beyond Uber and Airbnb—Tracking the long tail of the sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Ubaid Ullah Khan & Yousaf Ali & Mónika Garai-Fodor & Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir, 2023. "Application of Project Management Techniques for Timeline and Budgeting Estimates of Startups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Kromidha, Endrit & Li, Matthew C., 2019. "Determinants of leadership in online social trading: A signaling theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 184-197.
    12. Duch-Brown, Néstor & Rossetti, Fiammetta, 2020. "Digital platforms across the European regional energy markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Yuanyuan Guo & Yanqing Wang & Chaoyou Wang, 2019. "Exploring the Salient Attributes of Short-Term Rental Experience: An Analysis of Online Reviews from Chinese Guests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Wang, Yingjia & Fan, Di & Fung, Yi-Ning & Luo, Suyuan, 2022. "Consumer-to-consumer product exchanges for original fashion brands in the sharing economy: Good or bad for fashion knockoffs?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    15. Lindblom, Arto & Lindblom, Taru & Wechtler, Heidi, 2018. "Collaborative consumption as C2C trading: Analyzing the effects of materialism and price consciousness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 244-252.
    16. Correa, Juan C. & Garzón, Wilmer & Brooker, Phillip & Sakarkar, Gopal & Carranza, Steven A. & Yunado, Leidy & Rincón, Alejandro, 2019. "Evaluation of collaborative consumption of food delivery services through web mining techniques," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 45-50.
    17. Northey, Gavin & Brodie, Rod, 2020. "Leveraging the power of the sharing economy," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 1-3.
    18. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Evgeny Popov & Anna Veretennikova & Alisa Safronova, 2020. "Mathematical Support for Financing Social Innovations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Lauren Kim, Naeun & Ellie Jin, Byoungho, 2023. "Does beauty encourage sharing? Exploring the role of physical attractiveness and racial similarity in collaborative fashion consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:356:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923017671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.