IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v353y2024ipas0306261923014502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of LCOH of conventional technology, energy storage coupled solar PV electrolysis, and HTGR in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang, Pianpian
  • Jiang, Kejun
  • Wang, Jiachen
  • He, Chenmin
  • Chen, Sha
  • Jiang, Weiyi

Abstract

Hydrogen by electrolysis with solar PV and nuclear are regarded as the most promising zero‑carbon hydrogen production technologies to replace conventional fossil-fuel-based hydrogen production technologies. This study evaluates the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of conventional technologies with and without carbon price, solar and nuclear electricity-based technology, and the nuclear high temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) in China, and analyzes the effects of energy storage on the LCOH of solar electricity-to‑hydrogen in different photovoltaic resource regions. The results show that when considering carbon price, the LCOH of conventional technologies will rise to 1938–2564 $/tH2 in 2050. The LCOH of HTGR will be 1149 $/tH2 in 2050, much lower than that of coal gasification, which is widely used in China today. In the photovoltaic resource-rich region, solar PV electrolysis shows strong competitiveness, particularly for PEM_PV, whose LCOH could reduce to 1154 $/tH2 in 2050. While energy storage only serves solar PV electrolysis, it fails to increase the cost competitiveness of solar PEM. Therefore, zero carbon hydrogen could have cost advantage by 2040 in rich photovoltaic resource area and by HTGR.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang, Pianpian & Jiang, Kejun & Wang, Jiachen & He, Chenmin & Chen, Sha & Jiang, Weiyi, 2024. "Evaluation of LCOH of conventional technology, energy storage coupled solar PV electrolysis, and HTGR in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:353:y:2024:i:pa:s0306261923014502
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923014502
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rothwell, Geoffrey, 2022. "Projected electricity costs in international nuclear power markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Gunther Glenk & Stefan Reichelstein, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 347-347, April.
    3. Gunther Glenk & Stefan Reichelstein, 2019. "Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 216-222, March.
    4. Bhandari, Ramchandra & Shah, Ronak Rakesh, 2021. "Hydrogen as energy carrier: Techno-economic assessment of decentralized hydrogen production in Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 915-931.
    5. Kendall Mongird & Vilayanur Viswanathan & Patrick Balducci & Jan Alam & Vanshika Fotedar & Vladimir Koritarov & Boualem Hadjerioua, 2020. "An Evaluation of Energy Storage Cost and Performance Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-53, June.
    6. Tu, Qiang & Mo, Jianlei & Betz, Regina & Cui, Lianbiao & Fan, Ying & Liu, Yu, 2020. "Achieving grid parity of solar PV power in China- The role of Tradable Green Certificate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Zhang, You & Yuan, Zengwei & Margni, Manuele & Bulle, Cécile & Hua, Hui & Jiang, Songyan & Liu, Xuewei, 2019. "Intensive carbon dioxide emission of coal chemical industry in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 540-550.
    8. Khatiwada, Dilip & Vasudevan, Rohan Adithya & Santos, Bruno Henrique, 2022. "Decarbonization of natural gas systems in the EU – Costs, barriers, and constraints of hydrogen production with a case study in Portugal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Dolf Gielen & Deger Saygin & Emanuele Taibi & Jean‐Pierre Birat, 2020. "Renewables‐based decarbonization and relocation of iron and steel making: A case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1113-1125, October.
    10. Yan Xu & Junjie Kang & Jiahai Yuan, 2018. "The Prospective of Nuclear Power in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miao, Huiying & Yu, Yadong & Wan, Yanming & Zhang, Yan & Ma, Tieju, 2024. "Levelized cost of long-distance large-scale transportation of hydrogen in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    2. Fang, Juan & Yang, Miaomiao & Sui, Junpeng & Luo, Tengqi & Yu, Yinsheng & Ao, Yunjin & Dou, Ruifeng & Zhou, Wenning & Li, Wei & Liu, Xunliang & Zhao, Kai, 2024. "Enhancing solar-powered hydrogen production efficiency by spectral beam splitting and integrated chemical energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    3. Chen, Yan & Zhang, Ruiqian & Lyu, Jiayi & Hou, Yuqi, 2024. "AI and Nuclear: A perfect intersection of danger and potential?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Mantas Svazas & Valentinas Navickas, 2025. "The Synergy Potential of Energy and Agriculture—The Main Directions of Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-24, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Xiaojun & Li, Xingyi & Yuan, Jiahai & Jin, Yu, 2022. "A hydrogen-based zero-carbon microgrid demonstration in renewable-rich remote areas: System design and economic feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    2. Matthias Maldet & Daniel Schwabeneder & Georg Lettner & Christoph Loschan & Carlo Corinaldesi & Hans Auer, 2022. "Beyond Traditional Energy Sector Coupling: Conserving and Efficient Use of Local Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-36, June.
    3. Carlson, Ewa Lazarczyk & Pickford, Kit & Nyga-Łukaszewska, Honorata, 2023. "Green hydrogen and an evolving concept of energy security: Challenges and comparisons," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    4. Moradpoor, Iraj & Syri, Sanna & Santasalo-Aarnio, Annukka, 2023. "Green hydrogen production for oil refining – Finnish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Abadie, Luis Mª & Chamorro, José M., 2023. "Investment in wind-based hydrogen production under economic and physical uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    6. Jafri, Yawer & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Mesfun, Sennai & Rådberg, Henrik & Mossberg, Johanna & Hulteberg, Christian & Furusjö, Erik, 2020. "Combining expansion in pulp capacity with production of sustainable biofuels – Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emissions assessment of drop-in fuels from black liquor part-streams," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Shaojie Song & Haiyang Lin & Peter Sherman & Xi Yang & Chris P. Nielsen & Xinyu Chen & Michael B. McElroy, 2021. "Production of hydrogen from offshore wind in China and cost-competitive supply to Japan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Nybø, Astrid, 2020. "Transitioning remote Arctic settlements to renewable energy systems – A modelling study of Longyearbyen, Svalbard," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    9. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    10. Xu, Chuanbo & Wu, Yunna & Dai, Shuyu, 2020. "What are the critical barriers to the development of hydrogen refueling stations in China? A modified fuzzy DEMATEL approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Speckmann, Friedrich-W. & Keiner, Dominik & Birke, Kai Peter, 2020. "Influence of rectifiers on the techno-economic performance of alkaline electrolysis in a smart grid environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 107-116.
    12. Pan, Guangsheng & Gu, Wei & Chen, Sheng & Lu, Yuping & Zhou, Suyang & Wei, Zhinong, 2021. "Investment equilibrium of an integrated multi–stakeholder electricity–gas–hydrogen system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Lucas Bretschger & Karen Pittel, 2020. "Twenty Key Challenges in Environmental and Resource Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(4), pages 725-750, December.
    14. Rosa, Lorenzo & Mazzotti, Marco, 2022. "Potential for hydrogen production from sustainable biomass with carbon capture and storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, 2021. "LCOE: A Useful and Valid Indicator—Replica to James Loewen and Adam Szymanski," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-8, January.
    16. Lüth, Alexandra & Seifert, Paul E. & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Weibezahn, Jens, 2023. "How to connect energy islands: Trade-offs between hydrogen and electricity infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    17. Nyangon, Joseph & Darekar, Ayesha, 2024. "Advancements in hydrogen energy systems: A review of levelized costs, financial incentives and technological innovations," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    18. Stöckl, Fabian & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2021. "Optimal supply chains and power sector benefits of green hydrogen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11.
    19. Shamoushaki, Moein & Koh, S.C. Lenny, 2024. "Net-zero life cycle supply chain assessment of heat pump technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    20. Robert Grabarczyk & Krzysztof Urbaniec & Jacek Wernik & Marian Trafczynski, 2019. "Evaluation of the Two-Stage Fermentative Hydrogen Production from Sugar Beet Molasses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:353:y:2024:i:pa:s0306261923014502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.