IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v290y2021ics0306261921002257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reversible solid-oxide cell stack based power-to-x-to-power systems: Economic potential evaluated via plant capital-cost target

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yumeng
  • Wang, Ningling
  • Tong, Xiaofeng
  • Duan, Liqiang
  • Lin, Tzu-En
  • Maréchal, François
  • Van herle, Jan
  • Wang, Ligang
  • Yang, Yongping

Abstract

Electrical energy storage systems are indispensable for the electrical grid with high penetration renewables. Reversible solid-oxide cell stack based power-to-x-to-power systems, which can switch between power generation and power storage, can achieve a high round-trip efficiency and are technology neutral for, e.g., hydrogen, methane, methanol, ammonia and syngas. This paper evaluates, with a systematically decomposition-based optimization method, the economic feasibility of such dual-direction plants to assist wind farms for reliable electricity supply, under various scenarios with 150%/200%/250% wind electricity penetration and strong/weak interactions with chemical markets. The economic feasibility is represented by Plant CAPEX Target (€/ref-stack), defined as maximum affordable total plant investment costs divided by the equivalent number of reference stacks (5120 cm2 active cell area). The results show that, with strong interaction with chemical markets, hydrogen pathway is the most economically potential, especially under high wind electricity penetration (200, 250%). Plant CAPEX target of hydrogen pathway reaches 2300 €/ref-stack, followed by syngas (1900 €/ref-stack), while the methane, methanol and ammonia ones are less economically-feasible with targets around 1000 €/ref-stack. Economic feasibility of hydrogen pathway is less sensitive (above 2000 €/ref-stack) to hydrogen price when it is below 4 €/kg. Deploying multiple plants with operation-coordination freedom allows for the reduction of lost wind rate and the enhancement of profit. Plant designs with either high round-trip efficiency or good match with imbalance characteristics are preferred. When the chemicals produced are not sold to markets, syngas and methane pathways are more economically-feasible, with plant CAPEX target within 500–1000 €/ref-stack due to affordable onsite fuel storage and high round-trip efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yumeng & Wang, Ningling & Tong, Xiaofeng & Duan, Liqiang & Lin, Tzu-En & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan & Wang, Ligang & Yang, Yongping, 2021. "Reversible solid-oxide cell stack based power-to-x-to-power systems: Economic potential evaluated via plant capital-cost target," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:290:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921002257
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921002257
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116700?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reznicek, Evan P. & Braun, Robert J., 2020. "Reversible solid oxide cell systems for integration with natural gas pipeline and carbon capture infrastructure for grid energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Giap, Van-Tien & Kang, Sanggyu & Ahn, Kook Young, 2019. "HIGH-EFFICIENT reversible solid oxide fuel cell coupled with waste steam for distributed electrical energy storage system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 129-138.
    3. Chen, Bin & Hajimolana, Yashar S. & Venkataraman, Vikrant & Ni, Meng & Aravind, P.V., 2019. "Integration of reversible solid oxide cells with methane synthesis (ReSOC-MS) in grid stabilization: A dynamic investigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 558-567.
    4. Díaz-González, Francisco & Sumper, Andreas & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Villafáfila-Robles, Roberto, 2012. "A review of energy storage technologies for wind power applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2154-2171.
    5. Wang, Yifei & Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Xuan, Jin & Wang, Huizhi, 2017. "A review on unitized regenerative fuel cell technologies, part B: Unitized regenerative alkaline fuel cell, solid oxide fuel cell, and microfluidic fuel cell," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 775-795.
    6. Schimpe, Michael & Naumann, Maik & Truong, Nam & Hesse, Holger C. & Santhanagopalan, Shriram & Saxon, Aron & Jossen, Andreas, 2018. "Energy efficiency evaluation of a stationary lithium-ion battery container storage system via electro-thermal modeling and detailed component analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 211-229.
    7. Wang, Ligang & Zhang, Yumeng & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Aubin, Philippe & Lin, Tzu-En & Yang, Yongping & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan, 2020. "Reversible solid-oxide cell stack based power-to-x-to-power systems: Comparison of thermodynamic performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Wang, Yifei & Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Xuan, Jin & Wang, Huizhi, 2016. "A review on unitized regenerative fuel cell technologies, part-A: Unitized regenerative proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 961-977.
    9. Wendel, Christopher H. & Braun, Robert J., 2016. "Design and techno-economic analysis of high efficiency reversible solid oxide cell systems for distributed energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 118-131.
    10. Butera, Giacomo & Jensen, Søren Højgaard & Clausen, Lasse Røngaard, 2019. "A novel system for large-scale storage of electricity as synthetic natural gas using reversible pressurized solid oxide cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 738-754.
    11. Schnitkey, Gary, 2017. "Fertilizer Costs in 2017 and 2018," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 7, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qi, Meng & Kim, Minsu & Dat Vo, Nguyen & Yin, Liang & Liu, Yi & Park, Jinwoo & Moon, Il, 2022. "Proposal and surrogate-based cost-optimal design of an innovative green ammonia and electricity co-production system via liquid air energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Ghappani, Seyyed Aliasghar & Karimi, Ali, 2023. "Optimal operation framework of an energy hub with combined heat, hydrogen, and power (CHHP) system based on ammonia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Chao & Jing, Xiuhui & Miao, He & Xu, Jingxiang & Lin, Peijian & Li, Ping & Liang, Chaoyu & Wu, Yu & Yuan, Jinliang, 2021. "The physical properties and effects of sintering conditions on rSOFC fuel electrodes evaluated by molecular dynamics simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Saheli Biswas & Shambhu Singh Rathore & Aniruddha Pramod Kulkarni & Sarbjit Giddey & Sankar Bhattacharya, 2021. "A Theoretical Study on Reversible Solid Oxide Cells as Key Enablers of Cyclic Conversion between Electrical Energy and Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Zhong, Like & Yao, Erren & Zou, Hansen & Xi, Guang, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a directly solar-driven power-to-methane system by detailed distributed parameter method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    4. Giap, Van-Tien & Lee, Young Duk & Kim, Young Sang & Ahn, Kook Young, 2020. "A novel electrical energy storage system based on a reversible solid oxide fuel cell coupled with metal hydrides and waste steam," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Pu, Zonghua & Zhang, Gaixia & Hassanpour, Amir & Zheng, Dewen & Wang, Shanyu & Liao, Shijun & Chen, Zhangxin & Sun, Shuhui, 2021. "Regenerative fuel cells: Recent progress, challenges, perspectives and their applications for space energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    6. Reznicek, Evan P. & Braun, Robert J., 2020. "Reversible solid oxide cell systems for integration with natural gas pipeline and carbon capture infrastructure for grid energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Fiammetta Rita Bianchi & Barbara Bosio, 2021. "Operating Principles, Performance and Technology Readiness Level of Reversible Solid Oxide Cells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Han, Gwangwoo & Kwon, YongKeun & Kim, Joong Bae & Lee, Sanghun & Bae, Joongmyeon & Cho, EunAe & Lee, Bong Jae & Cho, Sungbaek & Park, Jinwoo, 2020. "Development of a high-energy-density portable/mobile hydrogen energy storage system incorporating an electrolyzer, a metal hydride and a fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Xia, Zhiping & Zhao, Dongqi & Li, Yuanzheng & Deng, Zhonghua & Kupecki, Jakub & Fu, Xiaowei & Li, Xi, 2023. "Control-oriented dynamic process optimization of solid oxide electrolysis cell system with the gas characteristic regarding oxygen electrode delamination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    10. Yang, Chao & Jing, Xiuhui & Miao, He & Wu, Yu & Shu, Chen & Wang, Jiatang & Zhang, Houcheng & Yu, Guojun & Yuan, Jinliang, 2020. "Analysis of effects of meso-scale reactions on multiphysics transport processes in rSOFC fueled with syngas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Wang, Ligang & Zhang, Yumeng & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Aubin, Philippe & Lin, Tzu-En & Yang, Yongping & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan, 2020. "Reversible solid-oxide cell stack based power-to-x-to-power systems: Comparison of thermodynamic performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Seda Canbulat & Kutlu Balci & Onder Canbulat & I. Safak Bayram, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of On-Site Energy Storage Units to Mitigate Wind Energy Curtailment: A Case Study in Scotland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Wang, Ligang & Zhang, Yumeng & Li, Chengzhou & Pérez-Fortes, Mar & Lin, Tzu-En & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan & Yang, Yongping, 2020. "Triple-mode grid-balancing plants via biomass gasification and reversible solid-oxide cell stack: Concept and thermodynamic performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    14. Jalili, Mohammad & Ghazanfari Holagh, Shahriyar & Chitsaz, Ata & Song, Jian & Markides, Christos N., 2023. "Electrolyzer cell-methanation/Sabatier reactors integration for power-to-gas energy storage: Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    15. Muhammad Tanveer & Kwang-Yong Kim, 2021. "Flow Configurations of Membraneless Microfluidic Fuel Cells: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-33, June.
    16. Wilberforce, Tabbi & Ijaodola, O. & Ogungbemi, Emmanuel & Khatib, F.N. & Leslie, T. & El-Hassan, Zaki & Thomposon, J. & Olabi, A.G., 2019. "Technical evaluation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell performance – A review of the effects of bipolar plates coating," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Guandalini, Giulio & Campanari, Stefano & Romano, Matteo C., 2015. "Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: Energy and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-130.
    18. Enevoldsen, Peter & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2016. "Integrating power systems for remote island energy supply: Lessons from Mykines, Faroe Islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 642-648.
    19. Rocha, A. & Ferreira, R.B. & Falcão, D.S. & Pinto, A.M.F.R., 2023. "Experimental study on a unitized regenerative fuel cell operated in constant electrode mode: Effect of cell design and operating conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. Cabrera-Tobar, Ana & Bullich-Massagué, Eduard & Aragüés-Peñalba, Mònica & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol, 2016. "Review of advanced grid requirements for the integration of large scale photovoltaic power plants in the transmission system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 971-987.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:290:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921002257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.