IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v262y2020ics0306261920300465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust bioenergy technologies for the German heat transition: A novel approach combining optimization modeling with Sobol’ sensitivity analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jordan, Matthias
  • Millinger, Markus
  • Thrän, Daniela

Abstract

Uncertainties are one of the major challenges of energy system optimization models (ESOM), yet little use is made of systematic uncertainty assessments in ESOM-based analyses. In this paper, an ESOM is combined with the global sensitivity analysis of Sobol’ to identify robust, competitive bioenergy technologies to fulfill the climate targets in the German heat sector under uncertain developments. Through the outlined method, only three out of 32 investigated parameters were identified to have uncertainties with significant impacts on the future competitiveness of bioenergy technologies: the power price, gas price and the defined climate target. Based on these findings, a solution space is quantified showing which bioenergy technologies are robust, competitive options under the uncertainty of the three influencing parameters. The use of biomass in the form of wood chips in (high temperature) industry applications is found to be the most robust choice in all cases, while hybrid combined heat and power wood pellet systems are an additional robust option when future power prices are increasing. Both technologies have the potential to close gaps in a sustainable energy system and should be considered for the future use of biomass in the German heat sector, when designing policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordan, Matthias & Millinger, Markus & Thrän, Daniela, 2020. "Robust bioenergy technologies for the German heat transition: A novel approach combining optimization modeling with Sobol’ sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:262:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920300465
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920300465
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Ravn, Hans & Münster, Marie, 2019. "Uncertainties towards a fossil-free system with high integration of wind energy in long-term planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    2. DeCarolis, Joseph & Daly, Hannah & Dodds, Paul & Keppo, Ilkka & Li, Francis & McDowall, Will & Pye, Steve & Strachan, Neil & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Usher, Will & Winning, Matthew & Yeh, Sonia & Zeyring, 2017. "Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 184-198.
    3. Bosetti, Valentina & Marangoni, Giacomo & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Diaz Anadon, Laura & Barron, Robert & McJeon, Haewon C. & Politis, Savvas & Friley, Paul, 2015. "Sensitivity to energy technology costs: A multi-model comparison analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 244-263.
    4. Matthias Jordan & Volker Lenz & Markus Millinger & Katja Oehmichen & Daniela Thran, 2019. "Future competitive bioenergy technologies in the German heat sector: Findings from an economic optimization approach," Papers 1908.10065, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2019.
    5. Usher, Will & Strachan, Neil, 2012. "Critical mid-term uncertainties in long-term decarbonisation pathways," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 433-444.
    6. Witzel, Carl-Philipp & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 681-696.
    7. Jordan, Matthias & Lenz, Volker & Millinger, Markus & Oehmichen, Katja & Thrän, Daniela, 2019. "Future competitive bioenergy technologies in the German heat sector: Findings from an economic optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Jian Chen & Chenghu Ma, 2016. "Option Pricing Based on Alternative Jump Size Distributions," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 11(3), pages 439-467, September.
    9. Silva, R. & Pérez, M. & Berenguel, M. & Valenzuela, L. & Zarza, E., 2014. "Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in the design of parabolic-trough direct steam generation plants for process heat applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 233-244.
    10. Moret, Stefano & Codina Gironès, Víctor & Bierlaire, Michel & Maréchal, François, 2017. "Characterization of input uncertainties in strategic energy planning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 597-617.
    11. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 219-238.
    12. Ritzen, Jo & Haas, Jasmina, 2016. "A Sustainable Euro Area with Exit Options," IZA Policy Papers 120, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Lythcke-Jørgensen, Christoffer & Ensinas, Adriano Viana & Münster, Marie & Haglind, Fredrik, 2016. "A methodology for designing flexible multi-generation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 34-54.
    14. Yang, Jian & Ma, Yinjie & Fu, Jianqin & Shu, Jun & Liu, Jingping, 2019. "Parametric study of gasoline properties on combustion characteristics of gasoline compression engines using reaction kinetics simulation and density-based global sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    15. Szarka, Nora & Eichhorn, Marcus & Kittler, Ronny & Bezama, Alberto & Thrän, Daniela, 2017. "Interpreting long-term energy scenarios and the role of bioenergy in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1222-1233.
    16. L. C. G. Rogers, 2015. "Bermudan options by simulation," Papers 1508.06117, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2016.
    17. Fei Su & Kung-Sik Chan, 2016. "Option Pricing with Threshold Diffusion Processes," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 133-141, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jing & Kang, Lixia & Huang, Xiankun & Liu, Yongzhong, 2021. "An analysis framework for quantitative evaluation of parametric uncertainty in a cooperated energy storage system with multiple energy carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Lauma Balode & Kristiāna Dolge & Dagnija Blumberga, 2023. "Sector-Specific Pathways to Sustainability: Unravelling the Most Promising Renewable Energy Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Millinger, M. & Reichenberg, L. & Hedenus, F. & Berndes, G. & Zeyen, E. & Brown, T., 2022. "Are biofuel mandates cost-effective? - An analysis of transport fuels and biomass usage to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    4. Ruichen Xu & Yong Pang & Zhibing Hu & Xiaoyan Hu, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Water Quality and Main Controlling Factors of Algal Blooms in Tai Lake, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Carta, José A. & Díaz, Santiago & Castañeda, Alberto, 2020. "A global sensitivity analysis method applied to wind farm power output estimation models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schyska, Bruno U. & Kies, Alexander, 2020. "How regional differences in cost of capital influence the optimal design of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Fodstad, Marte & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hellemo, Lars & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Pisciella, Paolo & Silvast, Antti & Bordin, Chiara & Schmidt, Sarah & Straus, Julian, 2022. "Next frontiers in energy system modelling: A review on challenges and the state of the art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Jåstad, Eirik Ogner & Trotter, Ian M. & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2022. "Long term power prices and renewable energy market values in Norway – A probabilistic approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Ravn, Hans & Münster, Marie, 2019. "Uncertainties towards a fossil-free system with high integration of wind energy in long-term planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Moret, Stefano & Codina Gironès, Víctor & Bierlaire, Michel & Maréchal, François, 2017. "Characterization of input uncertainties in strategic energy planning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 597-617.
    6. Jonathan Dumas & Antoine Dubois & Paolo Thiran & Pierre Jacques & Francesco Contino & Bertrand Cornélusse & Gauthier Limpens, 2022. "The Energy Return on Investment of Whole-Energy Systems: Application to Belgium," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-34, December.
    7. Àlex Alonso & Jordi de la Hoz & Helena Martín & Sergio Coronas & Pep Salas & José Matas, 2020. "A Comprehensive Model for the Design of a Microgrid under Regulatory Constraints Using Synthetical Data Generation and Stochastic Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Larisa Vazhenina & Elena Magaril & Igor Mayburov, 2022. "Resource Conservation as the Main Factor in Increasing the Resource Efficiency of Russian Gas Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Millinger, M. & Reichenberg, L. & Hedenus, F. & Berndes, G. & Zeyen, E. & Brown, T., 2022. "Are biofuel mandates cost-effective? - An analysis of transport fuels and biomass usage to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    10. Lopion, Peter & Markewitz, Peter & Robinius, Martin & Stolten, Detlef, 2018. "A review of current challenges and trends in energy systems modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 156-166.
    11. Mauleón, Ignacio, 2019. "Optimizing individual renewable energies roadmaps: Criteria, methods, and end targets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Lauma Balode & Kristiāna Dolge & Dagnija Blumberga, 2023. "Sector-Specific Pathways to Sustainability: Unravelling the Most Promising Renewable Energy Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Diederik Coppitters & Helena Martín & Jordi de la Hoz, 2023. "Economic and Regulatory Uncertainty in Renewable Energy System Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    14. Carta, José A. & Díaz, Santiago & Castañeda, Alberto, 2020. "A global sensitivity analysis method applied to wind farm power output estimation models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    15. Wang, Jing & Kang, Lixia & Huang, Xiankun & Liu, Yongzhong, 2021. "An analysis framework for quantitative evaluation of parametric uncertainty in a cooperated energy storage system with multiple energy carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Li, Hao & Zhong, Shengyuan & Wang, Yongzhen & Zhao, Jun & Li, Minxia & Wang, Fu & Zhu, Jiebei, 2020. "New understanding on information’s role in the matching of supply and demand of distributed energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Price, James & Keppo, Ilkka, 2017. "Modelling to generate alternatives: A technique to explore uncertainty in energy-environment-economy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 356-369.
    18. Daniel Scamman & Baltazar Solano-Rodríguez & Steve Pye & Lai Fong Chiu & Andrew Z. P. Smith & Tiziano Gallo Cassarino & Mark Barrett & Robert Lowe, 2020. "Heat Decarbonisation Modelling Approaches in the UK: An Energy System Architecture Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    19. Hao Li & Ying Qiao & Zongxiang Lu & Baosen Zhang, 2022. "Power System Transition with Multiple Flexibility Resources: A Data-Driven Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Xavier Rixhon & Gauthier Limpens & Diederik Coppitters & Hervé Jeanmart & Francesco Contino, 2021. "The Role of Electrofuels under Uncertainties for the Belgian Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:262:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920300465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.