IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v400y2025ics0306261925012796.html

Quantifying the benefit of load uncertainty reduction for the design of district energy systems under grid constraints using the value of information

Author

Listed:
  • Langtry, Max
  • Choudhary, Ruchi

Abstract

Load uncertainty must be accounted for during design to ensure building energy systems can meet energy demands during operation. Reducing building load uncertainty allows for improved designs with less compromise to be identified, reducing the cost of decarbonizing energy usage. However, the building monitoring required to reduce load uncertainty is costly. This study quantifies the economic benefit of practical building monitoring for supporting energy system design decisions, to determine if its benefits outweigh its cost. It uses an extension of the Value of Information analysis (VoI) framework, called ‘On-Policy’ VoI, which analyses the benefit of uncertainty reduction for complex decision making tasks where decision policies are required. This is applied to a case study district energy system design problem, where a Linear Program model is used to size solar-battery systems and grid connection capacity under uncertain building loads, modelled using historic electricity metering data. Load uncertainty is found to significantly impact both system operating costs (±30%) and the optimal system design (±20%). However, using building monitoring data to improve the design of the district reduces overall costs by less than 1.5% on average. As this is less than the cost of measurement, using monitoring is not economically worthwhile in this case. This provides the first numerical evidence to support the sufficiency of using standard building load profiles for energy system design. Further, reducing only uncertainty in mean load is found to provide most of the available decision support benefit, meaning using hourly measurement data provides little benefit for energy retrofit design.

Suggested Citation

  • Langtry, Max & Choudhary, Ruchi, 2025. "Quantifying the benefit of load uncertainty reduction for the design of district energy systems under grid constraints using the value of information," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 400(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:400:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012796
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925012796
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carpenter, Bob & Gelman, Andrew & Hoffman, Matthew D. & Lee, Daniel & Goodrich, Ben & Betancourt, Michael & Brubaker, Marcus & Guo, Jiqiang & Li, Peter & Riddell, Allen, 2017. "Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i01).
    2. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Helena Martín & Sergio Coronas & Jordi de la Hoz, 2022. "Optimization Models under Uncertainty in Distributed Generation Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-40, March.
    3. Khezri, Rahmat & Mahmoudi, Amin & Aki, Hirohisa, 2022. "Optimal planning of solar photovoltaic and battery storage systems for grid-connected residential sector: Review, challenges and new perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Eduardo Marco Modiano, 1987. "Derived Demand and Capacity Planning Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 185-197, April.
    5. Prataviera, Enrico & Vivian, Jacopo & Lombardo, Giulia & Zarrella, Angelo, 2022. "Evaluation of the impact of input uncertainty on urban building energy simulations using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Chu Donatus Iweh & Samuel Gyamfi & Emmanuel Tanyi & Eric Effah-Donyina, 2021. "Distributed Generation and Renewable Energy Integration into the Grid: Prerequisites, Push Factors, Practical Options, Issues and Merits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-34, August.
    7. Sanajaoba Singh, Sarangthem & Fernandez, Eugene, 2018. "Modeling, size optimization and sensitivity analysis of a remote hybrid renewable energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 719-731.
    8. Connolly, D. & Lund, H. & Mathiesen, B.V. & Leahy, M., 2010. "A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1059-1082, April.
    9. Niveditha, N. & Rajan Singaravel, M.M., 2022. "Optimal sizing of hybrid PV–Wind–Battery storage system for Net Zero Energy Buildings to reduce grid burden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    10. Yang, Yun & Zhang, Shijie & Xiao, Yunhan, 2015. "An MILP (mixed integer linear programming) model for optimal design of district-scale distributed energy resource systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1901-1915.
    11. Fodstad, Marte & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hellemo, Lars & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Pisciella, Paolo & Silvast, Antti & Bordin, Chiara & Schmidt, Sarah & Straus, Julian, 2022. "Next frontiers in energy system modelling: A review on challenges and the state of the art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 219-238.
    13. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    14. Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Kauko, Hanne & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Bakke, Sara Angell & Ettayebi, Amina & Haufe, Ina Renate, 2021. "Seasonal storage and demand side management in district heating systems with demand uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    15. Niu, Jide & Li, Xiaoyuan & Tian, Zhe & Yang, Hongxing, 2023. "A framework for quantifying the value of information to mitigate risk in the optimal design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    16. DeCarolis, Joseph & Daly, Hannah & Dodds, Paul & Keppo, Ilkka & Li, Francis & McDowall, Will & Pye, Steve & Strachan, Neil & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Usher, Will & Winning, Matthew & Yeh, Sonia & Zeyring, 2017. "Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 184-198.
    17. Pickering, B. & Choudhary, R., 2019. "District energy system optimisation under uncertain demand: Handling data-driven stochastic profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1138-1157.
    18. O'Shaughnessy, Eric & Cutler, Dylan & Ardani, Kristen & Margolis, Robert, 2018. "Solar plus: Optimization of distributed solar PV through battery storage and dispatchable load in residential buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 11-21.
    19. Tian, Wei & Heo, Yeonsook & de Wilde, Pieter & Li, Zhanyong & Yan, Da & Park, Cheol Soo & Feng, Xiaohang & Augenbroe, Godfried, 2018. "A review of uncertainty analysis in building energy assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 285-301.
    20. Jeffrey M. Keisler & Zachary A. Collier & Eric Chu & Nina Sinatra & Igor Linkov, 2014. "Value of information analysis: the state of application," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 3-23, March.
    21. Pfenninger, Stefan & Staffell, Iain, 2016. "Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1251-1265.
    22. Krukanont, Pongsak & Tezuka, Tetsuo, 2007. "Implications of capacity expansion under uncertainty and value of information: The near-term energy planning of Japan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1809-1824.
    23. Hans Olav Vogt Myklebust & Jo Eidsvik & Iver Bakken Sperstad & Debarun Bhattacharjya, 2020. "Value of Information Analysis for Complex Simulator Models: Application to Wind Farm Maintenance," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 134-153, June.
    24. Sharma, Pooja & Kolhe, Mohan & Sharma, Arvind, 2020. "Economic performance assessment of building integrated photovoltaic system with battery energy storage under grid constraints," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1901-1909.
    25. Adrien Deroubaix & Inga Labuhn & Marie Camredon & Benjamin Gaubert & Paul-Arthur Monerie & Max Popp & Johanna Ramarohetra & Yohan Ruprich-Robert & Levi G. Silvers & Guillaume Siour, 2021. "Large uncertainties in trends of energy demand for heating and cooling under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    26. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2016. "Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1224-1239.
    27. Novoa, Laura & Flores, Robert & Brouwer, Jack, 2019. "Optimal renewable generation and battery storage sizing and siting considering local transformer limits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petkov, Ivalin & Gabrielli, Paolo, 2020. "Power-to-hydrogen as seasonal energy storage: an uncertainty analysis for optimal design of low-carbon multi-energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Petkov, Ivalin & Mavromatidis, Georgios & Knoeri, Christof & Allan, James & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2022. "MANGOret: An optimization framework for the long-term investment planning of building multi-energy system and envelope retrofits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    3. David Huckebrink & Valentin Bertsch, 2021. "Integrating Behavioural Aspects in Energy System Modelling—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Theresa Liegl & Simon Schramm & Philipp Kuhn & Thomas Hamacher, 2023. "Considering Socio-Technical Parameters in Energy System Models—The Current Status and Next Steps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2022. "The importance of renewable gas in achieving carbon-neutrality: Insights from an energy system optimization model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Esser, Katharina & Finke, Jonas & Bertsch, Valentin & Löschel, Andreas, 2025. "Participatory modelling to generate alternatives to support decision-makers with near-optimal decarbonisation options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 395(C).
    7. Wu, You & Zhong, Lexuan, 2025. "Optimal adoption and cost-effectiveness of rooftop solar and wind turbines for community energy systems under climate change," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    8. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Nybø, Astrid, 2020. "Transitioning remote Arctic settlements to renewable energy systems – A modelling study of Longyearbyen, Svalbard," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    9. Urbano, Eva M. & Martinez-Viol, Victor & Kampouropoulos, Konstantinos & Romeral, Luis, 2022. "Risk assessment of energy investment in the industrial framework – Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for energy design and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    10. Gyanwali, Khem & Komiyama, Ryoichi & Fujii, Yasumasa, 2020. "Representing hydropower in the dynamic power sector model and assessing clean energy deployment in the power generation mix of Nepal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Jann Michael Weinand, 2020. "Reviewing Municipal Energy System Planning in a Bibliometric Analysis: Evolution of the Research Field between 1991 and 2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Wang, Jing & Ye, Kai & Kang, Lixia & Liu, Yongzhong, 2024. "Flexible design of renewable hydrogen production systems through identifying bottlenecks under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    13. Groissböck, Markus & Gusmão, Alexandre, 2020. "Impact of renewable resource quality on security of supply with high shares of renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    14. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Diederik Coppitters & Helena Martín & Jordi de la Hoz, 2023. "Economic and Regulatory Uncertainty in Renewable Energy System Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    15. Pickering, Bryn & Choudhary, Ruchi, 2021. "Quantifying resilience in energy systems with out-of-sample testing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    16. Chuat, Arthur & Terrier, Cédric & Schnidrig, Jonas & Maréchal, François, 2024. "Identification of typical district configurations: A two-step global sensitivity analysis framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    17. Wang, Jing & Kang, Lixia & Huang, Xiankun & Liu, Yongzhong, 2021. "An analysis framework for quantitative evaluation of parametric uncertainty in a cooperated energy storage system with multiple energy carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    18. Abuzayed, Anas & Hartmann, Niklas, 2022. "MyPyPSA-Ger: Introducing CO2 taxes on a multi-regional myopic roadmap of the German electricity system towards achieving the 1.5 °C target by 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    19. Lu, M.L. & Sun, Y.J. & Kokogiannakis, G. & Ma, Z.J., 2024. "Design of flexible energy systems for nearly/net zero energy buildings under uncertainty characteristics: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    20. Brisson, Joseph & Vallée, Mathieu & Piguet, Antoine & Lemaire, Pierre & Phouratsamay, Siao-Leu, 2025. "Impact of levels of modeling details in energy system sizing optimization: A case-study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:400:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.