IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v185y2017ip2p1019-1030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy logic-based predictive model for biomass pyrolysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lerkkasemsan, Nuttapol

Abstract

As pyrolysis reaction is one of an important reaction applied to lignocellulosic biomass in order to transform it to be user-friendly energy form recognized as prospective alternative energy source, the reaction has been widely investigated in order to understand the mechanisms and kinetics of the pyrolysis. However, modeling pyrolysis of biomass is full of complication. As lignocellulosic biomass is not a homogeneous chemical source, chemical compositions in biomass are also uncertain and they vary even in the same biomass. The reactions of imprecise chemical compositions in biomass affects the capability of deterministic model in modeling chemical reaction since available deterministic models are designed to model homogeneous and precise chemical compositions. With this problem, it raises the idea of using model which has ability to calculate something ambiguous. Since the fuzzy logic-based model which is adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is built to calculate uncertainty, the model should be suitable to handle uncertainty which is imprecise chemical compositions in the reaction. The proposed model is built with four input variables: the reaction time, amount of cellulose component, amount of hemicellulose component, and amount of lignin component in biomass. The model is trained with tuning datasets which are the pyrolysis datasets of lignin, cellulose and Madhuca before applying to predict the pyrolysis reactions of Pongamia pinnata and Jatropha curcas. The comparative results show that the proposed model can correctly predict 91.82% and 97.29%, respectively, of the pyrolysis reactions of P. pinnata and J. curcas. As the ANFIS model gives good prediction in modeling pyrolysis of two different biomasses, the model can be applied to predict the pyrolysis reaction of other lignocellulosic biomass products.

Suggested Citation

  • Lerkkasemsan, Nuttapol, 2017. "Fuzzy logic-based predictive model for biomass pyrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1019-1030.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p2:p:1019-1030
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916302616
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corral, Serafín & Legna-de la Nuez, David & Romero-Manrique de Lara, David, 2015. "Integrated assessment of biofuel production in arid lands: Jatropha cultivation on the island of Fuerteventura," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 41-53.
    2. Liu, Hui & Cattolica, Robert J. & Seiser, Reinhard & Liao, Chang-hsien, 2015. "Three-dimensional full-loop simulation of a dual fluidized-bed biomass gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 489-501.
    3. Skoulou, V. & Zabaniotou, A., 2007. "Investigation of agricultural and animal wastes in Greece and their allocation to potential application for energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 1698-1719, October.
    4. Sharma, Rajeev & Sheth, Pratik N. & Gujrathi, Ashish M., 2016. "Kinetic modeling and simulation: Pyrolysis of Jatropha residue de-oiled cake," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 554-562.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pomeroy, Brett & Grilc, Miha & Likozar, Blaž, 2022. "Artificial neural networks for bio-based chemical production or biorefining: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Peters, Jens F. & Banks, Scott W. & Bridgwater, Anthony V. & Dufour, Javier, 2017. "A kinetic reaction model for biomass pyrolysis processes in Aspen Plus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 595-603.
    3. Zhang, Jiyuan & Tang, Hailong & Chen, Min, 2019. "Linear substitute model-based uncertainty analysis of complicated non-linear energy system performance (case study of an adaptive cycle engine)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 87-108.
    4. Böhler, Lukas & Krail, Jürgen & Görtler, Gregor & Kozek, Martin, 2020. "Fuzzy model predictive control for small-scale biomass combustion furnaces," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Weijie & Wang, Shuai & Zhang, Kai & He, Yurong, 2020. "Numerical investigation of in situ gasification chemical looping combustion of biomass in a fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 216-225.
    2. Mosayeb Dashtpeyma & Reza Ghodsi, 2021. "Forest Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review on the Barriers and Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. David Romero Manrique de Lara & Serafin Corral & David Legna de la Nuez & Jesús Hernández Hernández, 2016. "A Socio-Institutional Approach to Brighten Complexity under Agricultural Pest Invasion Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Bujak, Janusz Wojciech, 2015. "New insights into waste management – Meat industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1174-1186.
    5. Zeng, Kuo & Soria, José & Gauthier, Daniel & Mazza, Germán & Flamant, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling of beech wood pellet pyrolysis under concentrated solar radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 721-729.
    6. Etxano, Iker & Villalba-Eguiluz, Unai, 2021. "Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Paraskevopoulou, Christina & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Bechtsis, Dimitrios & Tsolakis, Naoum, 2022. "An assessment of circular economy interventions in the peach canning industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    8. Janusz Bujak & Piotr Sitarz & Magdalena Nakielska, 2020. "Multidimensional Analysis of Meat and Bone Meal (MBM) Incineration Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-9, November.
    9. Hemant Ghai & Deepak Sakhuja & Shikha Yadav & Preeti Solanki & Chayanika Putatunda & Ravi Kant Bhatia & Arvind Kumar Bhatt & Sunita Varjani & Yung-Hun Yang & Shashi Kant Bhatia & Abhishek Walia, 2022. "An Overview on Co-Pyrolysis of Biodegradable and Non-Biodegradable Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Kong, Dali & Wang, Shuai & Luo, Kun & Hu, Chenshu & Li, Debo & Fan, Jianren, 2020. "Three-dimensional simulation of biomass gasification in a full-loop pilot-scale dual fluidized bed with complex geometric structure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 466-481.
    11. Aravani, Vasiliki P. & Sun, Hangyu & Yang, Ziyi & Liu, Guangqing & Wang, Wen & Anagnostopoulos, George & Syriopoulos, George & Charisiou, Nikolaos D. & Goula, Maria A. & Kornaros, Michael & Papadakis,, 2022. "Agricultural and livestock sector's residues in Greece & China: Comparative qualitative and quantitative characterization for assessing their potential for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Yang, Shiliang & Zhou, Tao & Wei, Yonggang & Hu, Jianhang & Wang, Hua, 2020. "Dynamical and thermal property of rising bubbles in the bubbling fluidized biomass gasifier with wide particle size distribution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Yang, Shiliang & Wan, Zhanghao & Wang, Shuai & Wang, Hua, 2020. "Computational fluid study of radial and axial segregation characteristics in a dual fluidized bed reactor system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Bhoi, P.R. & Ouedraogo, A.S. & Soloiu, V. & Quirino, R., 2020. "Recent advances on catalysts for improving hydrocarbon compounds in bio-oil of biomass catalytic pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Awudu, Iddrisu & Zhang, Jun, 2012. "Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1359-1368.
    16. Mourmouris, J.C. & Potolias, C., 2013. "A multi-criteria methodology for energy planning and developing renewable energy sources at a regional level: A case study Thassos, Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 522-530.
    17. Kang, Panxing & Zhang, Guangyi & Ge, Zefeng & Zha, Zhenting & Zhang, Huiyan, 2022. "Three-dimensional modelling and optimization of an industrial dual fluidized bed biomass gasification decoupling combustion reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    18. Corral, Serafin & de Lara, David Romero Manrique & Pereira, Angela & Cuenca, Eduardo, 2017. "Assessing the complexity of the spreading processes of agricultural pests: the case of the Guatemalan potato moth in Tenerife," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 338-348.
    19. Zhou, Tao & Yang, Shiliang & Wei, Yonggang & Hu, Jianhang & Wang, Hua, 2020. "Impact of wide particle size distribution on the gasification performance of biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 534-547.
    20. Tao, Guangcan & Lestander, Torbjörn A. & Geladi, Paul & Xiong, Shaojun, 2012. "Biomass properties in association with plant species and assortments I: A synthesis based on literature data of energy properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3481-3506.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p2:p:1019-1030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.