IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v307y2025ics0378377424005705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of water management on methane emissions and grain yield in paddy rice: A case study under subtropical conditions in Brazil using the CSM-CERES-Rice model

Author

Listed:
  • Figueiredo Moura da Silva, Evandro H.
  • Hoogenboom, Gerrit
  • Boote, Kenneth J.
  • Cuadra, Santiago Vianna
  • Porter, Cheryl H.
  • Scivittaro, Walkyria Bueno
  • Steinmetz, Silvio
  • Cerri, Carlos E. Pellegrino

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food and plays a crucial role in the food security of many countries. However, rice cultivation is associated with significant methane (CH4) emissions, contributing to overall greenhouse gas emissions and, thus, climate change. In this context, process-based crop models are useful tools for understanding and predicting the complex interactions between crop production, environmental factors, and sustainability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Cropping System Model (CSM)-CERES-Rice model and DSSAT-GHG module to predict daily methane emissions and rice grain yield for different irrigation practices in a subtropical environment. The study employed a comprehensive approach, including measurements of daily CH4 emissions, phenological stages, final aboveground biomass, and grain yield for rice cultivars BRS Pampa, BRS Pampeira, A705, and XP113 conducted over four consecutive crop seasons (2019–2023) and two irrigation systems: continuous flooding (CF) or alternate wetting and drying (AWD) in Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil. We followed a four-step methodology involving initial calibration of cultivar parameters, sensitivity analysis (soil-related parameters associated with CH4 emissions), final cultivar parameters calibration, and long-term simulation analysis. Based on the sensitivity analysis and comparison to observed emissions, modifications were made to soil-related parameters such as soil buffer regeneration after drainage events (BRAD) and the fraction of soil water-filled porosity above which methane production occurs (WFPSthresh) to enhance the accuracy of methane production. Optimal parameter combinations (WFPSthresh = 70 %, BRAD = 0.070 d−1) were selected based on a comparative analysis, enabling CH4 simulations under non-flooded conditions. The predictive capability of the CERES-Rice model exhibited an average bias for grain yield of 485 kg ha−1 under CF and 592 kg ha−1 under AWD conditions. The results showed that the GHG module of DSSAT, after BRAD and WFPSthresh parameter adjustments, was able to simulate daily CH4 emissions in paddy rice with a very good agreement (average index of agreement (D-Statistic) of 0.87 for CF and 0.70 for AWD). Following the model evaluation, long-term simulations for different irrigation practices revealed the impact on grain yield, cumulative methane emissions, and seasonal applied irrigation. The highest crop water-methane productivity (CWMP = 52 %) was observed under sprinkler irrigation at 50 % soil water depletion, identifying it as the most sustainable option in this subtropical environment. Thus, the CSM-CERES-Rice model combined with the DSSAT-GHG module proved to be a potential tool for agricultural and environmental management of rice fields under subtropical conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Figueiredo Moura da Silva, Evandro H. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit & Boote, Kenneth J. & Cuadra, Santiago Vianna & Porter, Cheryl H. & Scivittaro, Walkyria Bueno & Steinmetz, Silvio & Cerri, Carlos E. Pellegr, 2025. "Implications of water management on methane emissions and grain yield in paddy rice: A case study under subtropical conditions in Brazil using the CSM-CERES-Rice model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s0378377424005705
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424005705
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, Yujie & Qiao, Yunfa & Ma, Yinzheng & Huang, Weiliang & Komal, Khan & Miao, Shujie, 2024. "Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural systems: a comparative analysis of process models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    2. Liu, Jianliang & Huang, Xinya & Jiang, Haibo & Chen, Huai, 2021. "Sustaining yield and mitigating methane emissions from rice production with plastic film mulching technique," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    3. Jones, J. W. & Keating, B. A. & Porter, C. H., 2001. "Approaches to modular model development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 70(2-3), pages 421-443.
    4. Antolin, Luís A.S. & Heinemann, Alexandre B. & Marin, Fábio R., 2021. "Impact assessment of common bean availability in Brazil under climate change scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Ariani, Miranti & Hanudin, Eko & Haryono, Eko, 2022. "The effect of contrasting soil textures on the efficiency of alternate wetting-drying to reduce water use and global warming potential," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    6. Florian Roth & Elias Broman & Xiaole Sun & Stefano Bonaglia & Francisco Nascimento & John Prytherch & Volker Brüchert & Maysoon Lundevall Zara & Märta Brunberg & Marc C. Geibel & Christoph Humborg & A, 2023. "Methane emissions offset atmospheric carbon dioxide uptake in coastal macroalgae, mixed vegetation and sediment ecosystems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Gilhespy, Sarah L. & Anthony, Steven & Cardenas, Laura & Chadwick, David & del Prado, Agustin & Li, Changsheng & Misselbrook, Thomas & Rees, Robert M. & Salas, William & Sanz-Cobena, Alberto & Smith, , 2014. "First 20 years of DNDC (DeNitrification DeComposition): Model evolution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 292(C), pages 51-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ephrem Habyarimana & Faheem S Baloch, 2021. "Machine learning models based on remote and proximal sensing as potential methods for in-season biomass yields prediction in commercial sorghum fields," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Erika Tobiašová & Joanna Lemanowicz & Bożena Dębska & Martina Kunkelová & Juraj Sakáč, 2023. "The Effect of Reduced and Conventional Tillage Systems on Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Parameters of Different Soil Types," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Negm, L.M. & Youssef, M.A. & Skaggs, R.W. & Chescheir, G.M. & Jones, J., 2014. "DRAINMOD–DSSAT model for simulating hydrology, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and crop growth for drained crop land," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 30-45.
    4. Mack, Sarah K. & Lane, Robert R. & Deng, Jia & Morris, James T. & Bauer, Julian J., 2023. "Wetland carbon models: Applications for wetland carbon commercialization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    5. Nittaya Cha-un & Amnat Chidthaisong & Kazuyuki Yagi & Sirintornthep Towprayoon, 2021. "Simulating the Long-Term Effects of Fertilizer and Water Management on Grain Yield and Methane Emissions of Paddy Rice in Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Han, Huanhao & Gao, Rong & Cui, Yuanlai & Gu, Shixiang, 2022. "A semi-empirical semi-process model of ammonia volatilization from paddy fields under different irrigation modes and urea application regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    7. Stephen C. Hagen & Grace Delgado & Peter Ingraham & Ian Cooke & Richard Emery & Justin P. Fisk & Lindsay Melendy & Thomas Olson & Shawn Patti & Nathanael Rubin & Beth Ziniti & Haixin Chen & William Sa, 2020. "Mapping Conservation Management Practices and Outcomes in the Corn Belt Using the Operational Tillage Information System (OpTIS) and the Denitrification–Decomposition (DNDC) Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Zhao, Zheng & Cao, Linkui & Deng, Jia & Sha, Zhimin & Chu, Changbin & Zhou, Deping & Wu, Shuhang & Lv, Weiguang, 2020. "Modeling CH4 and N2O emission patterns and mitigation potential from paddy fields in Shanghai, China with the DNDC model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Patrick Smith, F. & Holzworth, Dean P. & Robertson, Michael J., 2005. "Linking icon-based models to code-based models: a case study with the agricultural production systems simulator," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 135-151, February.
    10. Beck, Howard & Morgan, Kelly & Jung, Yunchul & Grunwald, Sabine & Kwon, Ho-young & Wu, Jin, 2010. "Ontology-based simulation in agricultural systems modeling," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 463-477, September.
    11. Olukayode Oyatokun & Kolapo Oluwasemire, 2014. "Evaluating Starter N Application to Soybean With CROPGRO-Soybean Model in the Southern Guinea Savanna Agro-Ecology of Nigeria," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(8), pages 1-83, July.
    12. Kadigi, Ibrahim L. & Richardson, James W. & Mutabazi, Khamaldin D. & Philip, Damas & Mourice, Sixbert K. & Mbungu, Winfred & Bizimana, Jean-Claude & Sieber, Stefan, 2020. "The effect of nitrogen-fertilizer and optimal plant population on the profitability of maize plots in the Wami River sub-basin, Tanzania: A bio-economic simulation approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Aggarwal, P.K. & Kalra, N. & Chander, S. & Pathak, H., 2006. "InfoCrop: A dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests, and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. I. Model description," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Keating, B. A. & McCown, R. L., 2001. "Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 70(2-3), pages 555-579.
    15. Shufen Pang & Mazlinawati Abdul Majid & Hadinnapola Appuhamilage Chintha Crishanthi Perera & Mohammad Saydul Islam Sarkar & Jia Ning & Weikang Zhai & Ran Guo & Yuncheng Deng & Haiwen Zhang, 2024. "A Systematic Review and Global Trends on Blue Carbon and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Study from 2012 to 2023," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
    16. Jing, Rui & Li, Yubing & Wang, Meng & Chachuat, Benoit & Lin, Jianyi & Guo, Miao, 2021. "Coupling biogeochemical simulation and mathematical optimisation towards eco-industrial energy systems design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    17. Zhang, Feng & Zhang, Wenjuan & Li, Ming & Zhang, Yuan & Li, Fengmin & Li, Changbin, 2017. "Is crop biomass and soil carbon storage sustainable with long-term application of full plastic film mulching under future climate change?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 67-77.
    18. Xiaobo Xue Romeiko & Zhijian Guo & Yulei Pang & Eun Kyung Lee & Xuesong Zhang, 2020. "Comparing Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Spatially Explicit Life Cycle Global Warming and Eutrophication Impacts from Corn Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Aggarwal, P.K. & Banerjee, B. & Daryaei, M.G. & Bhatia, A. & Bala, A. & Rani, S. & Chander, S. & Pathak, H. & Kalra, N., 2006. "InfoCrop: A dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests, and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. II. Performance of the model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 47-67, July.
    20. Linlin Shi & Linlin Dong & Jun Zhang & Jing Huang & Yuan Shen & Yueyue Tao & Haihou Wang & Changying Lu, 2024. "Rotary Tillage Plus Mechanical Transplanting Practices Increased Rice Yields with Lower CH 4 Emission in a Single Cropping Rice System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s0378377424005705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.